The fight for democracy and media freedom in Hong Kong feels like it has “entered its endgame,” after a year of crackdowns, arrests and forced closures of outlets, the International Federation for Journalists (IFJ) said.
In a report on the ongoing threats to the media in Hong Kong, titled Lights Out, the IFJ called on governments to offer support and pathways for Hong Kong journalists seeking to flee the territory and find refuge to keep working.
It said that there was “a clear and documented exodus and closure of both local and international media outlets, journalists and media workers that once earned Hong Kong a reputation as a bastion for media excellence in the Asia region.”
About 20 media workers, executives and defenders have been arrested or detained since China imposed the National Security Law on Hong Kong in June 2020, including high-profile figures such as Apple Daily founder Jimmy Lai (黎智英).
In newly published letters from prison, the media mogul and democracy advocate said he feared the crackdown would eventually turn Hong Kong into “a cage, like Xinjiang,” where China is accused of incarcerating at least 1 million mostly Muslim minorities and other human rights abuses.
The IFJ report detailed the arrests, detentions, forced closures and other direct acts against the media, but also described more insidious efforts, including internal changes at national broadcasters, pro-Beijing media attacks and intimidation, and opacity around ever-shifting “red lines,” which the media struggle to navigate, as well as tightening restrictions on public records.
It said that fear and uncertainty now dominate life in Hong Kong, and “there is a now a palpable sense that the fight for democracy and media freedom has entered its endgame.”
“We haven’t come to this conclusion easily; it’s deeply concerning we’ve come to this point,” IFJ Asia Pacific director Jane Worthington said. “It’s changing the whole reporting map of Asia, what is happening in Hong Kong. It’s shuffling everything around.”
Since the introduction of the National Security Law, some foreign journalists have left, or been denied visas. The New York Times shifted staff to Seoul, while Initium Media decamped its headquarters to Singapore, and several journalists forced to leave China, who were unable to resettle in Hong Kong, have set up in Taiwan.
However, there are fewer options for Hong Kong journalists, Worthington said.
The IFJ said journalists who choose to move overseas would need support from foreign governments — akin to the UK’s pathways for Hongkongers — to continue their work in exile.
“We have a real argument that they are persecuted,” Worthington said. “Not all will have the economic circumstances to move themselves and their families... They need pathways.”
Of the media workers and defenders who have been detained, at least 12 have been charged with national security or other offenses, including Lai.
Arrested in August 2020, Lai has been in prison since December 2020, on remand and then serving sentences for a number of convictions, while also awaiting trial on national security charges.
In excerpts from prison letters written last year, to be published in next month’s issue of the Index on Censorship magazine, Lai railed against the government assault on freedom of the media and speech, and said he was relying on his faith as a source of strength while in jail.
Writing after Apple Daily’s closure, Lai said the “barbaric suppression” of Beijing and the Hong Kong government had worked and quieted the population.
“But the muted anger they have is not going away. Even those emigrating will have it forever,” he said.
“This Apple Daily shutdown only aggravates it, making it certain to people that the hopelessness of Hong Kong is irreversible. The more barbaric [the] treatment of Hong Kong people, [the] greater is their anger, and power of their potential resistance; [the] greater is the distrust of Beijing, of Hong Kong, [the] stricter is their rule to control,” Lai said. “The vicious circle of suppression-anger-and-distrust eventually will turn Hong Kong into a prison, a cage, like Xinjiang. World, cry for Hong Kong people.”
He also expressed some guilt over the suffering of his jailed fellow executives, in particular Apple Daily chief editor Lo Wai-kong (羅偉光).
“It would be disingenuous to say that by creating Apple Daily I have put him in this situation,” he wrote. “But I do have a guilty feeling and want to share his price of his cross, which is weighing too heavily on him.”
A few months later he wrote to staff in Canada.
“There is always a price to pay when you put truth, justice and goodness ahead of your own comfort, safety and physical well-being, or your life becomes a lie,” he said. “I choose truth instead of a lie and pay the price.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath