It is high time that the ban on imports of Japanese food products from five prefectures after the March 2011 Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant disaster is lifted in its entirety, and there is little disagreement on the matter from the governments of Taiwan and Japan.
At this year’s Taiwan-Japan Economic and Trade Conference, held via videoconference on Tuesday last week, Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association Chairman Mitsuo Ohashi urged Taiwan to “soon follow in the footsteps of the United States and European Union, and to properly address the issue according to scientific evidence and international standards.”
The following day, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that the government would proceed based on international standards and scientific evidence, while applying the principle of safeguarding public health. Taiwan-Japan Relations Association Chairman Chiou I-jen (邱義仁), who led Taiwan’s delegation in the conference with Ohashi, also evoked this principle, but added that the government currently had “no timeline” to resolve the issue.
The government’s position on safeguarding public health hardly needed to be stated, except that it was important to head off the political strategy it expects from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
However, it had better have a more substantial grasp of its schedule, as it does not have much time left: Late next year, the government will have its hands full campaigning for the 2024 presidential election, and the Tsai administration should have learned from its first term that equivocating on a major policy issue is not advantageous, as the opposition is likely to exploit indecision.
The majority of the international community, including the US and the EU, is satisfied with Japan’s measures to ensure that potentially irradiated food is subject to strict testing before it can be exported.
Taiwan and Japan are also aware of the economic argument, and what the lifting of the ban would mean for Taiwan’s application to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership. They also know that the only obstacle is the political issue of how to convince the Taiwanese public to accept the idea.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) can expect no help from the KMT with this. Even though there is apparent division within the party on the matter, Broadcasting Corp of China chairman Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), who heads the “blue fighters” movement, seems to believe that opposition for opposition’s sake is some kind of sacred duty, and KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) on Saturday said that the KMT Central Standing Committee, KMT-led local governments and party think tanks would collect scientific evidence and data to “defend the people’s health.”
The government and the public must therefore prepare for cherry-picked and misleading data in the coming weeks.
However, the KMT is increasingly losing support, even among voters disinclined to vote for the DPP.
Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), chairman of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), in 2019 referred to the 2018 referendum question on lifting the ban as “feeble-minded.” He said the issue should be solved scientifically and that a convincing reason would be needed to adopt different radiation level standards from the US and EU.
Ko and TPP legislators do not always agree on issues, but he is the party chairman.
If the government is to look for political support in relieving public concern about lifting the ban, it should look to the TPP, and not expect the KMT to offer any constructive opposition.
However, it must act quickly and decisively.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing