Even as debates swirl over their capability, a series of “hypersonic missiles” recently tested by nuclear-armed North Korea sparked sudden talk of pre-emptive strikes and arms races amid worry over the vulnerability of US troops and their allies in Asia.
North Korea started the new year with three missile tests in the space of two weeks, sparking reactions from Washington not seen since Pyongyang stopped testing its longest-range missiles, which can strike the US, in 2017.
At least two of the latest tests were of what North Korea called “hypersonic missiles” while details on the third, launched on Friday, were not immediately available.
Those hypersonic missiles, which have only regional reach, are not a threat to the continental US.
However, the weapons — which can fly below defenses and change course at high speed — represent a potential major upgrade in North Korea’s striking power against its nearby adversaries, and experts say it is unclear how the US and its Asian allies could counter that.
“These sorts of offense-defense races have been taking place globally for many decades now, and what we consistently see is that offense has the advantage,” said Cameron Tracy, a researcher at Stanford University’s Center for International Security and Cooperation (CISAC) in California. “North Korea will continue to deploy more missiles and to develop faster, more maneuverable systems that will keep South Korea vulnerable to attack.”
In the past few years, the US and South Korea — hoping to restart stalled talks with Pyongyang — have played down North Korea’s increasingly capable short-range missiles as concerning and a violation of UN Security Council resolutions, but not a standout threat.
However, last week, the administration of US President Joe Biden moved to impose its first sanctions over the North’s missile program, and South Korea’s leading presidential candidates are debating whether a preemptive strike was the only way to stop the new weapons.
Although, like most ballistic missiles, they travel at hypersonic speeds — more than five times the speed of sound — their key feature is the ability to maneuver and fly on lower trajectories than traditional ballistic missiles, making them harder to track and shoot down.
“In a worst-case scenario, North Korea could launch the missile in a ballistic curve which makes it appear to be a test into the sea, but then have it maneuver below or around radar systems and even turn a corner to strike a target in South Korea or Japan with a nuclear weapon,” said Melissa Hanham, also a researcher at CISAC.
CAPABILITY UNKNOWN
Analysts caution that it is far from clear how capable North Korea’s new systems are or when they will be deployed. South Korea’s military said the missile tested this year appears to have a conical maneuverable re-entry vehicle (MaRV) for its warhead, rather than the more high-tech “glider” style seen on some missiles developed by China and other nations.
Many ballistic missile defense (BMD) systems are meant to shoot down missiles following the high, arching flight of traditional ballistic projectiles, many of which touch the edge of space before plunging back to Earth.
“If they are deployed, they will pose a stiffer challenge to BMD systems designed to handle medium-range missiles, like THAAD and Aegis, which are presently designed to guard against weapons approaching their targets on a more or less straight line,” Nonproliferation Review editor Joshua Pollack said of North Korea’s MaRV missiles.
Additionally, South Korea and the roughly 28,500 US troops based there are so close that incoming missiles could fly on even lower trajectories, with a much shorter flight time, making defense more difficult, said David Wright, a nuclear security researcher the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Wright’s research shows that flying on such a “depressed trajectory” could also allow North Korea’s latest missiles to evade defenses in more distant places such as Japan, which hosts tens of thousands of US troops.
Many South Koreans have become used to living under the threat of North Korean weapons, but governments in the US and Japan cannot ignore North Korea’s advancing programs, retired South Korean general Chun In-bum said.
“The North Korea hypersonic weapon system will undoubtedly become better,” he said. “This is bad news for everyone.”
The South Korean Ministry of Defense on Thursday said it could not only detect the new missiles, but also intercept them.
Some of the candidates for South Korea’s presidency do not seem so sure.
“Missiles that travel at speeds over Mach 5, if they are loaded with nuclear warheads, will reach the Seoul metropolitan area in less than a minute,” leading conservative presidential candidate Yoon Suk-yeol told reporters on Tuesday last week. “Interception is practically impossible.”
Yoon said diplomacy is needed to ensure a war never happens.
However, if diplomacy fails, Yoon added, pre-emptive strikes would be needed to stop an imminent launch.
North Korea hides its missiles, so there is no evidence that a pre-emptive strike would eliminate the threat, Wright said.
“If that vulnerability is a concern, which it should be, the only realistic response is to negotiate with North Korea to reduce the risk of such attacks,” he said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing