China is accelerating plans to replace US and foreign technology, quietly empowering a secretive government-backed organization to vet and approve local suppliers in sensitive areas from cloud to semiconductors, people familiar with the matter said.
Formed in 2016 to advise Beijing’s leadership, the Chinese Information Technology Application Innovation Working Committee has been entrusted to help set industry standards and train personnel to operate trusted software. The quasi-government body is to devise and execute the so-called “IT Application Innovation” plan, better known as xinchuang (新創) in Chinese. It has been given a selection of suppliers vetted under the plan to provide technology for sensitive sectors from banking to data centers storing Chinese government information, a market that could be worth US$125 billion by 2025.
So far, 1,800 Chinese suppliers of PCs, chips, networking and software have been invited to join the committee, the people said, asking not to be identified as the information is private.
Illustration: June Hsu
The organization has certified hundreds of local companies this year as committee members, the fastest pace in years, one of the people said.
The existence of a xinchuang white-list, whose members and over-arching goals have not been previously reported, is likely to inflame tensions just as US President Joe Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) wrapped up their first face-to-face virtual summit. It gives Beijing more leverage to replace foreign tech firms in sensitive sectors, and quickens a push to help local champions achieve technology self-sufficiency and overcome sanctions first imposed by the administration of former US president Donald Trump, in fields such as networking and chips.
“China is trying to develop homegrown technologies,” Gavekal Dragonomics technology analyst Dan Wang (王丹) said. “This effort is more serious now that many more domestic firms now share that political goal, since no one can be sure that US technologies can avoid US export controls.”
The push to replace foreign suppliers is part of a broader effort by Beijing to exert control over its sprawling technology industry, including data security.
The government has forced overseas cloud providers such as Amazon Web Services and Microsoft to set up joint ventures to operate in China. Apple has also yielded its user data storage business to a government-backed operator in Guizhou Province.
The grip is set to tighten, as the Chinese Ministry of Industry and Information Technology gains more oversight of industrial and telecom data and has proposed new rules that require crucial data to be stored inside the country.
While few details have been revealed about the committee or its members, any companies that are more than 25 percent foreign-owned would be excluded from the panel, shutting out overseas suppliers including Intel and Microsoft. Chinese tech start-ups that are primarily funded by foreign investment would also face a higher bar, although Alibaba Group Holding and Tencent Holdings, the country’s two largest providers of cloud services, have circumvented the rules by applying for membership through locally incorporated subsidiaries, the people said.
“US choke-hold policies, exemplified by the Entity List, were the direct catalyst that pushed China to build the xinchuang sector,” Shanghai-based research firm iResearch said in a report in July. “The blacklisting underlined the urgency for China to invest more in technology innovation and have the key technologies made in China.”
The ministry and the China Electronics Standardization Association, which oversees the committee, did not respond to requests for comment.
Alibaba representatives did not immediately respond to a written request for comment, and a Tencent spokesperson declined to comment.
The committee had 1,160 members in July last year, said Netis, a cloud company that said it has passed the complex review process. Other prominent companies include Beijing-based CPU maker Loongson, server maker Inspur and operating systems developer Standard Software. Westone, an information security company that could potentially be tasked by Beijing to take over Didi Global’s data management, is also a member.
Membership on the panel could give local suppliers a key advantage in having their technology approved under the xinchuang plan, thus unlocking a billion-dollar market. Xinchuang-related business generated 162 billion yuan (US$25.36 billion) in sales last year and is on track to reach nearly 800 billion yuan by 2025, a report coauthored by the China Software Industry Association said.
“In every sector of the Xinchuang industry, there’s a significant imbalance between supply and demand,” it said. “Suppliers need to press the gas pedal to the floor in order to meet the demand.”
In September, the Xinhua news agency-backed Economic Information Daily listed 40 top performers of the project, which included Huawei Technologies, Alibaba’s cloud unit and network security company Qi An Xin Technology Group. In an April list of 70 model cases in the xinchuang industry, the ministry praised Alibaba’s “100 percent self-developed” cloud platform for “providing a safe, trustworthy digital infrastructure for all levels of governments.”
Chinese Communist Party entities, the government and military are to be the first to adopt xinchuang products, followed by financial and state-owned companies, iResearch Consulting Group said.
“Xinchuang can’t be built in one day. It’s a long-term strategy that helps China grow its own IT technologies,” the report said.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
Taiwan is confronting escalating threats from its behemoth neighbor. Last month, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army conducted live-fire drills in the East China Sea, practicing blockades and precision strikes on simulated targets, while its escalating cyberattacks targeting government, financial and telecommunication systems threaten to disrupt Taiwan’s digital infrastructure. The mounting geopolitical pressure underscores Taiwan’s need to strengthen its defense capabilities to deter possible aggression and improve civilian preparedness. The consequences of inadequate preparation have been made all too clear by the tragic situation in Ukraine. Taiwan can build on its successful COVID-19 response, marked by effective planning and execution, to enhance
RSS