The government should draw up new measures to boost tourism to Palau, as a “travel bubble” arrangement between Taiwan and the Pacific ally has turned out not to be fruitful.
Earlier this week, Palauan President Surangel Whipps Jr told a news conference that there would be no flights from Taipei to Koror this month due to cancelations by China Airlines. He urged Taiwan to consider whether other airlines could serve the route.
“I think China Airlines is playing with Palau market. They need to change their behavior, need to be invested and think long-term about the Palau market. What they are doing is poisoning Palau’s market, and it is irresponsible,” Palau’s Island Times quoted him as saying on Friday.
In response, China Airlines said that since the travel bubble program started on April 1, it has operated two flights per week to Palau, except for when the program was suspended from May to July due to a severe local COVID-19 outbreak in Taiwan. However, it had in the past few weeks canceled some flights, citing a drop in bookings.
Trying to ease the tension, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday lauded China Airlines for helping promote Taiwan-Palau tourism. The ministry said it would discuss with pertinent agencies and businesses how to improve flight links with Palau to ensure that the travel bubble is stable and convenient for travelers.
The inception of the program on April 1 was met with significant public attention.
Whipps and his wife arrived in Taiwan on March 28 for a five-day trip to promote it, accompanied by US Ambassador to Palau John Hennessey-Niland. They met with President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and Minister of Foreign Affairs Joseph Wu (吳釗燮). At a joint news conference with the visitors, Wu thanked the US for its help in making the travel bubble possible.
It was Whipps’ first overseas trip after taking office, after Wu from Jan. 20 to 22 visited Palau to attend his inauguration ceremony. While Taiwan and Palau only established diplomatic ties in 1999, their bonds appear to be stronger than the nation’s relations with other allies, such as those in Central America, which often appear torn between the US and China.
Palau last month also accepted visitors vaccinated with the domestically developed Medigen COVID-19 vaccine, which has so far only also been recognized by Belize, Indonesia and New Zealand.
However, Palau is not unfamiliar with Beijing’s economic clout. In May 2018, then-Palauan president Tommy Remengesau said that his country would not bow to Chinese pressure to cut off ties with Taiwan, after China in 2017 banned group tours to Palau. While he said that Palau and Taiwan share values such as freedom, he also told Nikkei Asia in an interview that “if we had a choice, we would like to recognize China and Taiwan tomorrow.”
Remengesau’s remarks reflect the struggles of Pacific island nations whose economies rely heavily on tourism, which might also be behind the pressure faced by Whipps, and why he had to reproach China Airlines publicly.
Taiwan cannot expect the travel bubble to be a cure-all for Palau’s post-COVID-19 recovery.
After all, tourism is driven by market needs, and the government cannot force people to visit another country. Most tourists value fresh experiences, and they might favor destinations other than Palau, such as Japan, once Tokyo and Taipei open their borders.
To consolidate the nation’s ties with its faithful friend Palau, the government should propose more measures to support Palau’s economy.
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
RSS