The People’s Republic of China (PRC) weaponizes economic development zones to undermine Taiwan’s national sovereignty by placing Special Economic Zones (SEZs) in or near the last remaining bastions of Taiwanese support overseas to sway public opinion away from the nation.
Of the 6,500 SEZs worldwide, 2,500 are within China. What most people do not realize is that there are an additional 500 such zones outside of China.
As of this year, Nicaragua tenuously continues to diplomatically recognize the Republic of China (ROC). This is perhaps why PRC state enterprises are investing so much money into Nicaraguan economic development projects.
Chinese billionaire Wang Jing (王靖), chief executive officer of Beijing Xinwei Group, is raising US$50 billion to create a canal to compete with the Panama canal. The project’s price tag is three times higher than the entire GDP of Nicaragua — US$13 billion.
A second canal is inherently good — it would create thousands of jobs, boost Nicaragua’s economy and improve the efficiency of global trade.
However, one of the reasons behind the project should be clear — to sway Nicaragua away from the ROC and toward the PRC.
A major component of the canal would likely include the creation of dozens of SEZs along it to stimulate economic growth. The PRC often creates the zones to accompany its maritime infrastructure megaprojects, as can be seen with the Port of Colombo in Sri Lanka, the Port of Mombasa in Kenya and the Chancay Multipurpose Port Terminal in Peru. SEZs allow Chinese companies to partially exempt themselves from local laws. Chinese SEZs along the Nicaragua canal would also compete with Panama’s Colon Free Zone.
Neighboring Honduras is in a similar situation. It also recognizes the ROC, making it a target for Chinese economic development programs.
For years, Honduras faced significant problems with its power grid, despite having abundant water resources. The PRC stepped in, giving the Honduran government a US$300 million loan in 2015 on favorable terms to finance the creation of the Patuca III hydroelectric dam. Honduras then, in turn, hired Sinohydro, a Chinese state-run hydroelectric company, to build the dam. Patuca III became operational in December last year.
Honduran sources have revealed to the Adrianople Group, a US-based business intelligence firm that studies SEZs, that there are plans to construct Chinese SEZs in Honduras.
The Chinese zones would be incorporated under Honduras’ Organic Law of Employment and Economic Development Zones, or ZEDE, which allows private businesses to establish cities with nearly complete legal autonomy. ZEDE’s were created to help US businesses avoid problems associated with bureaucracy and corruption.
Chinese ZEDEs in Honduras would generate many much-needed jobs and investment. They would also sway public opinion in favor of the PRC and away from Taiwan.
Perhaps the future of Nicaragua and Honduras can be seen in El Salvador, which for decades had recognized the ROC.
However, in August 2018, El Salvador officially switched its support from the ROC to the PRC.
In the years leading up to the switch, China announced that it would invest hundreds of millions of dollars of development aid, including a US$40 million national library, a US$85 million water treatment plant and a brand new national stadium.
Only weeks after El Salvador’s official recognition of the PRC, the Chinese government announced the creation of six new SEZs — massive in scale — covering nearly 14 percent of El Salvador’s territory. Chinese state-run companies would have funneled hundreds of millions of dollars of foreign direct investment to Nicaragua through these zones.
However, the move has faced delays due to perceptions of a Chinese land grab.
Are the PRC’s zones good or bad? It entirely depends on perspective.
From the perspective of the people in the zones, they are often life-changing gifts of economic development. From the perspective of the PRC, they are cynical tools of foreign policy. From the ROC’s perspective, they are time bombs.
The PRC’s most powerful weapon is its ability to generate meaningful economic development. Chinese development projects positively impact the lives of the people in the regions where they occur — which is what makes them so threatening to the ROC.
While the PRC has significantly more money to offer than the ROC, it is far less subtle and agile.
The only way for the ROC to compete is through low-cost, high-impact investments.
Thibault Serlet is a special economic zones analyst.
Taiwan aims to elevate its strategic position in supply chains by becoming an artificial intelligence (AI) hub for Nvidia Corp, providing everything from advanced chips and components to servers, in an attempt to edge out its closest rival in the region, South Korea. Taiwan’s importance in the AI ecosystem was clearly reflected in three major announcements Nvidia made during this year’s Computex trade show in Taipei. First, the US company’s number of partners in Taiwan would surge to 122 this year, from 34 last year, according to a slide shown during CEO Jensen Huang’s (黃仁勳) keynote speech on Monday last week.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
When China passed its “Anti-Secession” Law in 2005, much of the democratic world saw it as yet another sign of Beijing’s authoritarianism, its contempt for international law and its aggressive posture toward Taiwan. Rightly so — on the surface. However, this move, often dismissed as a uniquely Chinese form of legal intimidation, echoes a legal and historical precedent rooted not in authoritarian tradition, but in US constitutional history. The Chinese “Anti-Secession” Law, a domestic statute threatening the use of force should Taiwan formally declare independence, is widely interpreted as an emblem of the Chinese Communist Party’s disregard for international norms. Critics
RSS