The conflicts between businesses and Republican leaders such as Texas Governor Greg Abbott over COVID-19 vaccine mandates highlights the Republican Party’s shift from a pro-business, anti-regulatory party to one that answers to a populist base.
Similar disputes are playing out nationally as anti-vaccine politics have run into strategies by companies to operate their businesses safely and as they see fit. Abbott’s executive order issued on Monday last week barring any entity, including an employer, from requiring a COVID-19 vaccination puts him squarely in opposition to the plans of many Texas businesses. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis on Tuesday proposed a law to shield workers from dismissal for not being vaccinated.
Abbott’s order puts companies in a bind between it and US President Joe Biden’s directive for companies with 100 or more employees to require workers be vaccinated. Abbott was once considered the champion of corporate interests, while DeSantis is leading in some Republican polls for the 2024 presidential election.
Illustration: Yusha
Business groups and the companies they represent say vaccines and other mitigation measures are crucial to beating the pandemic and spurring economic recovery, a view Biden encourages. Republican politicians responding to voters advocating populist positions championed by former US president Donald Trump have made minimizing the virus an act of personal freedom.
That approach might cost some Republican candidates the corporate support they once could rely on. Some states’ chambers of commerce, including in Ohio and Oklahoma, are considering using their political action committees to support pro-business Democrats and oppose what they consider to be “anti-business Republicans.”
“If they’re anti-business, they should be worried that we’re going to put a target on their back,” said Steve Stivers, president and chief executive of the Ohio Chamber of Commerce and a former Republican member of the US House of Representatives.
The moves to impose prohibitions on businesses come as many large companies, including Walmart, United Airlines, the Walt Disney Co and Alphabet’s Google have started to require vaccinations. Some, like McDonald’s, have mandated inoculations for office workers but not for front-line employees. United CEO Scott Kirby has said that more than 98 percent of the airline’s US-based employees have been vaccinated.
Texas-based American Airlines Group, the biggest US airline, and No. 4 Southwest Airlines said on Tuesday they would defy Abbott’s order and instead follow Biden’s requirements.
Republican officials such as Abbott and DeSantis have defended prohibitions on businesses on grounds that no one should be forced to be vaccinated or wear a mask. DeSantis also said that he would contest federal vaccine mandates for large private-sector businesses.
He has backed issuing fines to companies that require patrons to show proof of vaccination, saying at a news conference in Pensacola, Florida, last month that his job is “not to protect corporate freedom,” a position Republicans once embraced.
The governor is not concerned about losing business support because government must protect individual rights and allow people to make their own medical decisions, DeSantis spokeswoman Christina Pushaw said.
“Being pro-business does not mean enabling corporate policies that violate individual rights,” Pushaw said.
Still, executives such as Kirby and business groups such as the Greater Houston Partnership, the city’s chamber of commerce, see employer-driven mandates as the way to defeat the pandemic that has killed more than 700,000 Americans.
“Vaccinations are our path out of the pandemic, and the partnership remains focused on supporting steps that lead to improving the rate of vaccination in our community,” Bob Harvey, the partnership’s president and chief executive, said in a statement.
White House press secretary Jen Psaki on Tuesday assailed the moves by Abbott and DeSantis, saying they are “putting politics ahead of public health” and “every leader should be focused on supporting efforts to save lives and end the pandemic.”
Abbott spokeswoman Renae Eze said that some Texans are worried about losing their jobs if they refuse a vaccine mandate, and Biden’s requirement leaves employers with a choice of contravening federal regulations or losing workers.
The governor’s order “will help protect Texans from having to make that choice,” Eze said in a statement.
In Ohio, House Republicans on Wednesday paused hearings for lack of a consensus on a bill to prohibit businesses from requiring vaccines that are not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. The bill would otherwise allow mandates — with exemptions including “reasons of conscience.” It was an attempted compromise after business groups opposed an earlier bill to prohibit mandates.
The Ohio chamber still opposes it as a “kinder and gentler” way of taking authority away from business owners, Stivers said.
Stivers, who resigned from the US Congress in May to take over the Ohio chamber, is a former head of the National Republican Congressional Committee. Now, he is ramping up fundraising for the chamber’s political action committee.
In Oklahoma, the State Chamber and other business interests also might look to oppose Republican lawmakers who are championing a measure to prohibit employers from requiring vaccines when the state legislature returns in February, president and chief executive Chad Warmington said.
“It could cause them to take a strong look at the people that are supporting this and say: ‘Hey, are they really for, you know, businesses in the state? Are they really promoters of free enterprise? Do they really believe in the principles that we thought that they did?’” Warmington said.
Republican politicians have embraced opposition to vaccine and mask mandates as outrage against them grew on the right, reflecting the party’s changing voter base.
A Gallup poll released on Sept. 3 found that 56 percent of Americans favor requiring proof of vaccination to go to an office or work site. That support plunges among Republicans to only 24 percent, compared with 88 percent of Democrats and 43 percent of independents. Republicans say it should be a matter of personal choice.
Polls also show that Republicans are not as concerned about business interests as they once were.
Gallup found a sharp drop in the percentage of Republicans who are satisfied with the size and influence of major corporations, falling to a record 31 percent in January from 57 percent a year earlier. Satisfaction with big business among Democrats remained essentially unchanged at about 25 percent, the surveys found.
Although businesses are still more aligned with Republicans than Democrats on issues such as taxation, the more that US party politics is defined by the “culture wars,” the more it puts businesses — especially big business — in conflict with traditional Republican partisan allies, said David Hopkins, a Boston College political science professor who has studied and written about political polarization.
“The problem is really the replacement of the traditional business-friendly leadership of the Republican Party with a much more culturally motivated leadership,” Hopkins said.
Lydia Saad, Gallup’s director of US social research, said Republican satisfaction with corporations was higher when Trump took office in 2017 because he was associated with business.
Republican approval fell as he clashed with businesses over social issues such as the Black Lives Matter movement, accusations of “censorship” by major technology companies and the response to the coronavirus pandemic, Saad said.
Businesses oppose states telling them they cannot require employee vaccinations or other COVID-19 mitigation measures, just as they object to Biden requiring that all companies with 100 or more employees must have their workers vaccinated or tested weekly. Businesses say they should be allowed to operate as they see fit.
The threat by some state chambers to oppose Republicans carries some political risk. There was a backlash when the US Chamber of Commerce endorsed 23 freshmen House Democrats for re-election last year over Republican challengers. The chamber declined to comment.
Stivers said he has not had any complaints from his member businesses for targeting Republicans.
Instead, he said, “I’ve had a lot of people tell me that it was about time we actually went after folks who were causing problems for our Ohio businesses.”
What began on Feb. 28 as a military campaign against Iran quickly became the largest energy-supply disruption in modern times. Unlike the oil crises of the 1970s, which stemmed from producer-led embargoes, US President Donald Trump is the first leader in modern history to trigger a cascading global energy crisis through direct military action. In the process, Trump has also laid bare Taiwan’s strategic and economic fragilities, offering Beijing a real-time tutorial in how to exploit them. Repairing the damage to Persian Gulf oil and gas infrastructure could take years, suggesting that elevated energy prices are likely to persist. But the most
Taiwan should reject two flawed answers to the Eswatini controversy: that diplomatic allies no longer matter, or that they must be preserved at any cost. The sustainable answer is to maintain formal diplomatic relations while redesigning development relationships around transparency, local ownership and democratic accountability. President William Lai’s (賴清德) canceled trip to Eswatini has elicited two predictable reactions in Taiwan. One camp has argued that the episode proves Taiwan must double down on support for every remaining diplomatic ally, because Beijing is tightening the screws, and formal recognition is too scarce to risk. The other says the opposite: If maintaining
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), during an interview for the podcast Lanshuan Time (蘭萱時間) released on Monday, said that a US professor had said that she deserved to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize following her meeting earlier this month with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Cheng’s “journey of peace” has garnered attention from overseas and from within Taiwan. The latest My Formosa poll, conducted last week after the Cheng-Xi meeting, shows that Cheng’s approval rating is 31.5 percent, up 7.6 percentage points compared with the month before. The same poll showed that 44.5 percent of respondents
India’s semiconductor strategy is undergoing a quiet, but significant, recalibration. With the rollout of India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) 2.0, New Delhi is signaling a shift away from ambition-driven leaps toward a more grounded, capability-led approach rooted in industrial realities and institutional learning. Rather than attempting to enter the most advanced nodes immediately, India has chosen to prioritize mature technologies in the 28-nanometer to 65-nanometer range. That would not be a retreat, but a strategic alignment with domestic capabilities, market demand and global supply chain gaps. The shift carries the imprimatur of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, indicating that the recalibration is