After the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lost the Chinese Civil War in 1949, it retreated to Taiwan to establish the Republic of China’s government-in-exile. Led by self-styled “Generalissimo” Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), the government lacked money to rebuild Taipei, which had been heavily bombed during World War II. Most new buildings were thrown up haphazardly and as cheaply as possible. Aside from the National Palace Museum and a few other notable exceptions, there was no money in the national coffers for grand architectural projects, as Chiang believed he would only be in Taiwan for a short sojourn before “retaking the mainland.”
By the time of Chiang’s death in 1975, Taiwan had achieved an economic miracle and was in a much stronger financial position, but by then it was clear that “retaking the mainland” was a lost cause. The Executive Yuan established a funeral committee to construct a lavish memorial to Chiang, selecting architect Yang Cho-cheng (楊卓成) as lead designer.
Yang’s design for Taipei’s Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall — a quadrilateral structure with plain white, high-sided walls, capped with an octagonal roof covered in blue glazed tiles — incorporates many elements of traditional Chinese architecture, seeking to mirror the Sun Yat-sen (孫中山) Mausoleum in Nanjing, China. Sun is considered by both the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party as the spiritual figurehead of their respective political ideologies.
The hall, which sits at the eastern side of the Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Park, is flanked by the National Theater and National Concert Hall. The area has become a national landmark and tourist attraction. The austere stone plaza leading up to the hall has been the stage for numerous seminal events during Taiwan’s democratization and was renamed Liberty Square by former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁).
Due to Chiang’s authoritarian rule, the nation remains deeply divided over how to represent the former president’s legacy. In the pan-green camp, most view Chiang as a tyrant with blood on his hands and are adamant that all iconography relating to him should be expunged from public spaces. Many in the pan-blue camp say that while grave mistakes were made, without the KMT’s fortification of Taiwan against a Chinese invasion, Taiwan would have long ago been annexed by Beijing.
On Wednesday, the Transitional Justice Commission announced its plan to transform the hall, which includes removing a large bronze statue of Chiang. In a report, the commission called the 6.3m bronze sculpture an “axis of worship” and recommended that the hall’s function and appearance be changed to allow for “reflection on Taiwan’s authoritarian history.”
Presidential Office spokesman Xavier Chang (張惇涵) yesterday said that debate over the hall is ongoing, adding that the government welcomes suggestions and dialogue to reach a consensus.
As former vice president Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) has previously suggested, the hall could be transformed into a space dedicated to honoring all of Taiwan’s former presidents.
The Taipei Times has long argued that transforming the hall into a Presidents’ Memorial Hall — perhaps with statues of equal height flanking the walls of the main chamber in chronological order — while not a perfect solution, would go a long way toward healing the nation. It would also provide a focal point to celebrate Taiwan’s transition to a democracy, warts and all. It is the only feasible way to put this political hot potato to bed.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath