The withdrawal of US forces from Afghanistan resulted in the Taliban romping to victory in a blitzkrieg-style campaign, knocking over the Afghan army like skittles. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) wasted no time in milking the fall of Kabul for all it was worth.
Taiwan’s KMT-supporting pan-blue media immediately began to sow discord about the Taiwan-US relationship. No matter how many times the pan-blue camp professes to be pro-US, at critical junctures, it always reveals its true colors.
Taiwanese can draw an important lesson from this episode. The total collapse of the Afghanistan government was caused by two main factors: over-reliance on US protection and extreme internal corruption.
This has happened before. Endemic levels of corruption bedeviled both the KMT party-state regime and the US-sponsored South Vietnam government; they lacked fighting spirit and lost the support of their people. US support was the chief problem.
However, without US support, Taiwan would have long ago been invaded by China. There is no point trying to pretend otherwise; China’s power and military strength simply dwarf Taiwan’s.
Due to Taiwan’s issues with national identity, spies and traitors abound, some of whom occupy important positions.
While Taiwan’s location affords it geostrategic importance, Taiwanese must make the US believe that Taiwan is worth protecting. Taiwan must believe in itself and become an indispensable economic and military ally to the US.
On the economic front, Taiwan is already an indispensable electronics and technology supplier in the US’ industrial supply chain, a fact gratifyingly affirmed by Washington.
However, from a military perspective, questions remain.
First, high-ranking Taiwanese military officers have a habit of traveling to China and pledging loyalty to the CCP after retirement. This begs the question: During service, were their pledges of allegiance to the nation made in earnest?
Second, when these retired high-ranking officers make inappropriate statements designed to incite insurrection, why do serving officers not come forward in large numbers to denounce these individuals? Is it because of personal relationships, or is there another reason?
Responding to the shenanigans by pro-KMT media, Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) hit the nail on the head, saying: “Afghanistan is today in a state of chaos because of internal chaos. Taiwan just needs to prevent internal disorder and it can resist any external force that might try to invade the nation.”
From Former KMT chairman Lien Chan’s (連戰) call to “unite with the CCP to control Taiwan” and former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) promotion of the so-called “1992 consensus,” successive KMT politicians have sought to create internal chaos and let the wolf in through the back door.
Taiwan’s internal enemies are still running amok: Chinese spies are still being given overly lenient sentences, handed trivial fines or even found not guilty by Taiwanese courts. The COVID-19 pandemic has seen the hyping up of so-called “vaccine chaos” by Taiwan’s fifth column.
Without timely assistance from the US and Japan gifting Taiwan urgently needed supplies of COVID-19 vaccines, who knows what might have occurred? How many Taiwanese would have followed the siren call to accept Chinese vaccines?
If the KMT and the CCP were to incite a riot or a military insurrection, would Taiwanese flee like Afghans or would they stand their ground and fight for their country?
Hopefully Taiwanese would not wait for the government to take a stand or the US or Japan to come to their aid, and would not be afraid to sacrifice themselves by taking up a position on the front line to protect the nation, its wealth and future generations of Taiwanese.
Everyone has seen how cheaply the CCP values the lives of its citizens. Are Taiwanese really willing to become Chinese?
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Edward Jones
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS