The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged democracies worldwide with legal and ethical dilemmas, pitting public health against other core values such as privacy and freedom of movement.
Throughout most of the pandemic, Taiwan has been uniquely successful at avoiding these tradeoffs by keeping the virus at bay with minimal restrictions, the strictest among them border controls. Yet even while the government deserves praise for its successes, it is still allowing some violations of basic rights to skirt by under the radar.
Since last year, foreign spouses have been calling for senseless spousal visa rules to be eased, but their concerns have fallen on deaf ears. There have been countless stories about people stuck in bureaucratic limbo, some of whom have been forced to separate after spouses were told they cannot apply for a dependent visa without leaving the country. In one case, a French woman on a working holiday visa was left scrambling when officials denied her application for a dependent visa under her husband’s residence permit and she was told she would have to leave the country to apply again, even though she was seven months pregnant.
When a domestic COVID-19 outbreak began in May, the government took the further step of suspending the issuance of all spousal visas. Even after the outbreak was tenuously contained, this ban has remained because of concerns about the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2. Meanwhile, education officials are allowing more than 13,000 foreign students to enter the country for the start of the fall semester, leaving foreign spouses wondering why school supersedes their right to be with their families.
Asked about the issue at a news conference on Wednesday last week, the Central Epidemic Command Center said it would keep handling cases “on an individual basis.” The problem with this strategy is that it has already proven problematic.
Exceptions are allowed for “humanitarian” reasons, such as visiting a critically ill relative or accompanying a pregnant spouse, but while intended to give immigration officials leeway to make their own judgement calls, the ill-defined rules have in some cases had the opposite effect.
According to an unnamed official interviewed by the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper), those who do not know about the exception are left waiting, while applications from more privileged petitioners who have access to support networks and can apply pressure through the media have all been accepted, many for less important reasons such as employment or because they miss their partner.
Unaware of the policy and what constitutes a “humanitarian” reason, few immigration officials are recommending this route, inadvertently separating an estimated 1,000-plus spouses and children from their families.
The vast majority of people would agree that the “humanitarian” thing to do would be to keep immediate families together, especially while weathering a global pandemic. Yet ambiguous rules — however well-intentioned — are adding undue stress to people already anxious about being separated from their partners, as well as to immigration officials who are unsure of the rules and reluctant to pass judgement on a case.
Even Australia, whose extremely strict movement restrictions in pursuit of a “COVID zero” policy have attracted heated debate, unambiguously allows immediate family members of Australians and permanent residents to enter the country.
Considering the low impact of allowing so few people into the country versus its immense significance to the individuals involved and to Taiwan’s reputation as a nation that upholds human rights, it only makes sense for the government to allow dependents into the country.
During the long Lunar New Year’s holiday, Taiwan has shown several positive developments in different aspects of society, hinting at a hopeful outlook for the Year of the Horse, but there are also significant challenges that the country must cautiously navigate with strength, wisdom and resilience. Before the holiday break, Taiwan’s stock market closed at a record 10,080.3 points and the TAIEX wrapped up at a record-high 33,605.71 points, while Taipei and Washington formally signed the Taiwan-US Agreement on Reciprocal Trade that caps US tariffs on Taiwanese goods at 15 percent and secures Taiwan preferential tariff treatment. President William Lai (賴清德) in
As red lanterns adorn street corners and social media feeds teem with zodiac divinations, the Year of the Horse has arrived. In our hyper-accelerated age, the horse is almost exclusively synonymous with the idiom ma dao cheng gong (馬到成功) — “instant success upon arrival.” It is a linguistic shot of adrenaline, fueling the thrilling illusion that once the bell tolls, our lives would screech off into a cloud of dust, leaving all troubles behind. Yet, when examining the millennia-long partnership between humans and this magnificent “biological machine,” a different truth emerges. The true essence of the horse is not merely speed;
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Deputy Chairman Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑) earlier this month led a delegation to Beijing to attend a think tank forum between the KMT and Chinese Communist Party (CCP). After returning to Taiwan, Hsiao spoke at length about “accumulating mutual trust” and letting matters “fall into place,” portraying the forum as a series of discussions focused on cooperation in tourism, renewable energy, disaster prevention, emerging industries, health and medicine, and artificial intelligence (AI). However, when the entire dialogue presupposes the so-called “1992 consensus — the idea that there is only “one China,” with each side of the Taiwan
India is getting richer every year, but its cities do not seem to be getting any more livable. Not because the country is too poor, or because leaders lack ambition, but because urban citizens are starved of funds and deprived of representation — and the government is in no hurry to fix it, even though people are dying as a result. Mumbai’s skyline is dotted with opulent glass towers, and it calls itself India’s commercial capital. The civic body, the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corp, is the country’s richest. Yet, residents have lived for years with no say in how their city was
RSS