Artist and tour guide Louke Spigt makes ends meet by offering tours to some of the millions of foreign visitors who pour into the Dutch capital, Amsterdam, each year seeking culture, cannabis and excitement.
Yet even she has misgivings about their return after the Dutch government started lifting most COVID-19 lockdown restrictions in April, opening the door again to mass tourism in one of the world’s most visited cities.
“The problems are the uncontrollable groups of drinking Brits, the low-budget tourists who throw all their waste on the streets,” said the blue-haired Spigt, 53. “We want other [kinds of] tourists.”
As Amsterdam emerges from heavy COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, it faces a balancing act: how to revive the tourism trade that underpins nearly one-tenth of the city’s economy, while making sure it does not dominate at the expense of residents.
To do that, the city is looking to urgently shed its “anything goes” image — based on its tolerance of cannabis and sex work in the famous Red Light District — and focus on bringing in visitors who would rather indulge in its cultural and historical offerings.
“Amsterdam is in a lucky position where it could really use the pandemic to try some new things,” said Ko Koens, a professor of new urban tourism at Inholland University of Applied Sciences.
Unlike some other holiday hotspots, the city has a wide range of industries, which means it can afford to curb damaging tourism, he said. “This is the time to experiment,” Koens added.
Amsterdam’s hotel stays nosedived by 68 percent amid the global pandemic last year, municipality data showed.
Dutch bank ABN Amro expects visitor numbers to remain comparatively low this year, with a loss in revenue of about 8 billion euros (US$9.5 billion) to the city and its businesses.
About 11 percent of Amsterdam’s workforce is employed in the tourism sector, and many are looking forward to being able to return to their jobs after 15 months of repeated lockdowns.
“It feels great. Finally, after a long period I’m back on the water. It’s my passion,” luxury canal boat skipper Joost Barendsen said.
Others living in Amsterdam’s city center are less happy.
Marlies Weyergang, 61, said she is dreading the return of rowdy tourists to the picturesque central Nieuwmarkt district, home to a growing number of holiday rentals.
“We have seen so many Airbnbs appear in our area. As residents they don’t bring us any benefits,” Weyergang said.
‘BETTER BALANCE’
Amsterdam had about 20 million foreign visitors in 2019 and its center usually hosts five tourists for every permanent resident, government statistics showed.
Residents say the city is a victim of its own success, with those visitors bringing litter and noise as well as skyrocketing rents due to the boom in holiday rentals that have priced out many locals.
Last month, Amsterdam’s City Hall launched a 100,000 euro publicity campaign focused on food, museums and nature to draw culturally minded tourists over those coming on drunken stag parties or drug-fueled adventures.
“If tourists only want to smoke weed, drink too much alcohol and visit the Red Light District, please stay home,” Amsterdam Deputy Mayor Victor Everhardt said in an e-mail.
“We have not been able to steal great ideas from other cities — they are now looking at us on how we are dealing with tourism,” Everhardt wrote.
Even before the pandemic, authorities had been working to tackle antisocial behavior by visitors and make the city more liveable for permanent residents.
In the past few years, the municipality has banned new hotels and souvenir shops, and forbidden holiday rentals in certain areas.
Left-leaning Amsterdam Mayor Femke Halsema has also made proposals to ban tourists from buying weed and to move the Red Light District from the city center to a new “erotic center” on the outskirts.
The changes have drawn criticism from some quarters, such as sex workers in the Red Light United union, who have said the plans will make them “less visible” and therefore more vulnerable to human trafficking.
Some also question whether the efforts to dispel rowdy behavior are workable.
“The drunk tourists will always be here. They were already here in the 17th century when sailors were getting drunk in the same bars. It’s part of Amsterdam’s society,” said Berber Hidma, a 34-year-old tour guide.
However, the plans have been generally welcomed by residents.
“Tourists shouldn’t think that just because you can smoke a joint here you can do whatever you like,” said Willem Bosse, 55, an information technology consultant who said his home in central Amsterdam is within two minutes of 10 coffee shops — most of them selling cannabis — but no butcher or bakery.
“As residents, we always have to adapt to accommodate the tourists. There needs to be a better balance,” he said.
POSITIVE EFFECT
Businesses are also taking action to encourage more positive tourism.
For the past two years, walking tour company Tours That Matter has been offering visitors opportunities to explore Amsterdam through themes such as colonization, gentrification or sustainability.
It also takes tourists to sites outside of the city center, for example to the Bijlmer area, one of Amsterdam’s poorest and most diverse districts.
“We ... focus on positive impact to make sure the locals want to have the tourists,” Tours That Matter cofounder Anouschka Trauschke said.
“We train locals, like artists or former homeless people — some of whom don’t have other employment — to become tour guides and share their stories,” Trauschke said.
Zoku, an Amsterdam-based company offering hybrid home, office and hotel accommodation, has designed its rental lofts to allow tourists and residents to mingle in common spaces.
Locals and visitors regularly share organized dinners at long, wooden dining tables in its restaurant.
Zoku has expanded into Copenhagen and Vienna, two cities also grappling with the challenge of accommodating tourists without hurting residents.
“If you want people to behave like guests you also need to treat them like guests and not commodities,” Koens said. “We should look much more at the societal value tourism can bring than the economic profits — that’s the switch we need to make.”
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
We are witnessing a sea change in the government’s approach to China, from one of reasonable, low-key reluctance at rocking the boat to a collapse of pretense over and patience in Beijing’s willful intransigence. Finally, we are seeing a more common sense approach in the face of active shows of hostility from a foreign power. According to Article 2 of the 2020 Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法), a “foreign hostile force” is defined as “countries, political entities or groups that are at war with or are engaged in a military standoff with the Republic of China [ROC]. The same stipulation applies to
RSS