Artist and tour guide Louke Spigt makes ends meet by offering tours to some of the millions of foreign visitors who pour into the Dutch capital, Amsterdam, each year seeking culture, cannabis and excitement.
Yet even she has misgivings about their return after the Dutch government started lifting most COVID-19 lockdown restrictions in April, opening the door again to mass tourism in one of the world’s most visited cities.
“The problems are the uncontrollable groups of drinking Brits, the low-budget tourists who throw all their waste on the streets,” said the blue-haired Spigt, 53. “We want other [kinds of] tourists.”
As Amsterdam emerges from heavy COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, it faces a balancing act: how to revive the tourism trade that underpins nearly one-tenth of the city’s economy, while making sure it does not dominate at the expense of residents.
To do that, the city is looking to urgently shed its “anything goes” image — based on its tolerance of cannabis and sex work in the famous Red Light District — and focus on bringing in visitors who would rather indulge in its cultural and historical offerings.
“Amsterdam is in a lucky position where it could really use the pandemic to try some new things,” said Ko Koens, a professor of new urban tourism at Inholland University of Applied Sciences.
Unlike some other holiday hotspots, the city has a wide range of industries, which means it can afford to curb damaging tourism, he said. “This is the time to experiment,” Koens added.
Amsterdam’s hotel stays nosedived by 68 percent amid the global pandemic last year, municipality data showed.
Dutch bank ABN Amro expects visitor numbers to remain comparatively low this year, with a loss in revenue of about 8 billion euros (US$9.5 billion) to the city and its businesses.
About 11 percent of Amsterdam’s workforce is employed in the tourism sector, and many are looking forward to being able to return to their jobs after 15 months of repeated lockdowns.
“It feels great. Finally, after a long period I’m back on the water. It’s my passion,” luxury canal boat skipper Joost Barendsen said.
Others living in Amsterdam’s city center are less happy.
Marlies Weyergang, 61, said she is dreading the return of rowdy tourists to the picturesque central Nieuwmarkt district, home to a growing number of holiday rentals.
“We have seen so many Airbnbs appear in our area. As residents they don’t bring us any benefits,” Weyergang said.
Amsterdam had about 20 million foreign visitors in 2019 and its center usually hosts five tourists for every permanent resident, government statistics showed.
Residents say the city is a victim of its own success, with those visitors bringing litter and noise as well as skyrocketing rents due to the boom in holiday rentals that have priced out many locals.
Last month, Amsterdam’s City Hall launched a 100,000 euro publicity campaign focused on food, museums and nature to draw culturally minded tourists over those coming on drunken stag parties or drug-fueled adventures.
“If tourists only want to smoke weed, drink too much alcohol and visit the Red Light District, please stay home,” Amsterdam Deputy Mayor Victor Everhardt said in an e-mail.
“We have not been able to steal great ideas from other cities — they are now looking at us on how we are dealing with tourism,” Everhardt wrote.
Even before the pandemic, authorities had been working to tackle antisocial behavior by visitors and make the city more liveable for permanent residents.
In the past few years, the municipality has banned new hotels and souvenir shops, and forbidden holiday rentals in certain areas.
Left-leaning Amsterdam Mayor Femke Halsema has also made proposals to ban tourists from buying weed and to move the Red Light District from the city center to a new “erotic center” on the outskirts.
The changes have drawn criticism from some quarters, such as sex workers in the Red Light United union, who have said the plans will make them “less visible” and therefore more vulnerable to human trafficking.
Some also question whether the efforts to dispel rowdy behavior are workable.
“The drunk tourists will always be here. They were already here in the 17th century when sailors were getting drunk in the same bars. It’s part of Amsterdam’s society,” said Berber Hidma, a 34-year-old tour guide.
However, the plans have been generally welcomed by residents.
“Tourists shouldn’t think that just because you can smoke a joint here you can do whatever you like,” said Willem Bosse, 55, an information technology consultant who said his home in central Amsterdam is within two minutes of 10 coffee shops — most of them selling cannabis — but no butcher or bakery.
“As residents, we always have to adapt to accommodate the tourists. There needs to be a better balance,” he said.
Businesses are also taking action to encourage more positive tourism.
For the past two years, walking tour company Tours That Matter has been offering visitors opportunities to explore Amsterdam through themes such as colonization, gentrification or sustainability.
It also takes tourists to sites outside of the city center, for example to the Bijlmer area, one of Amsterdam’s poorest and most diverse districts.
“We ... focus on positive impact to make sure the locals want to have the tourists,” Tours That Matter cofounder Anouschka Trauschke said.
“We train locals, like artists or former homeless people — some of whom don’t have other employment — to become tour guides and share their stories,” Trauschke said.
Zoku, an Amsterdam-based company offering hybrid home, office and hotel accommodation, has designed its rental lofts to allow tourists and residents to mingle in common spaces.
Locals and visitors regularly share organized dinners at long, wooden dining tables in its restaurant.
Zoku has expanded into Copenhagen and Vienna, two cities also grappling with the challenge of accommodating tourists without hurting residents.
“If you want people to behave like guests you also need to treat them like guests and not commodities,” Koens said. “We should look much more at the societal value tourism can bring than the economic profits — that’s the switch we need to make.”
As the incursions by China into Taiwan’s air defense identification zone intensify, the international community’s anxiety has risen over the question of whether the US military would become directly involved in the case of an attack on Taiwan. Washington’s long-held policy of “strategic ambiguity” does little to ease the trepidation. The rationale universally espoused on “strategic ambiguity” is that an announced commitment from Washington to directly defend Taiwan would encourage Taiwanese independence and consequently bring forth a Chinese military attack and a possible nuclear confrontation between two superpowers. However, this line of argument could soon lose steam if the subject is viewed from
Having deceived the world about its nuclear capabilities while preparing for an arms race, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is now using its increasing nuclear forces for virtual nuclear coercion. This new threat will continue until the United States, Japan, and Taiwan can restore the CCP’s sense of fear. This dynamic is a familiar one for Taiwan. As the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) capabilities have grown, its inhibitions about conducting larger and more frequent coercive military demonstrations have shrunk. The PLA now more openly practices for the destruction of Taiwan’s democracy and the murder of its citizens. In the nuclear realm,
In an unprecedented move, a group of democratic nations led by the US, UK and EU in a joint statement on Tuesday accused the Chinese Ministry of State Security of having carried out a major cyberattack earlier this year and stealing data from at least 30,000 organizations worldwide, including governments, universities and firms in key industries. Western officials were reportedly perplexed by the attack’s brazen execution and unparalleled scale. In an article on the attack, BBC security correspondent Gordon Corera wrote: “Western spies are still struggling to understand why Chinese behavior has changed.” The attack raises the fear “that they [China]
At the conclusion of the G7 Leaders’ Summit on June 13, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who participated virtually, called for the reform of multilateral institutions as the best signal of commitment to the cause of open societies. His comments are significant in light of China’s ongoing and successful efforts to control international organizations, and, in particular, to keep Taiwan out of critical health agencies amid the COVID-19 pandemic. China’s influence over the WHO is well known. It has used this control to deny Taiwan a place at the World Health Assembly (WHA), the decisionmaking body of the WHO. Taiwan’s absence