Since the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have been urged to follow the science. If you have been skeptical about new vaccine technologies or the need for lengthy lockdowns, you have likely had friends retort with advice from the WHO or the US Centers for Disease Control, or even quote an academic study or two.
However, there is one area where governments and societies at large have not followed the science — wearing masks outdoors.
For more than a year, scientists have continually found that SARS-CoV-2, including its Delta variant, is transmitted outdoors only in exceptionally rare circumstances. Where they did find such transmission was in crowded areas such as sporting events and concerts, which accounted for only 6 percent of cases before lockdowns occurred.
To catch COVID-19 in an everyday outdoor situation, a person would likely need to be face-to-face with a carrier who is coughing. Otherwise, the virus dissipates, blows away, drops to the ground or is neutralized by ultraviolet sunlight. It does not linger the way it does in an enclosed space.
If thousands of carriers are suspected to be roaming the streets, perhaps it is worth the abundance of caution to enforce outdoor mask rules and eliminate possibilities for chance transmissions.
However, Taiwan is not dealing with such numbers. New local infections totaled 212 in the past seven days, compared with 427 the week before. If the trend continues to halve each week, there should be fewer than 200 COVID-19 carriers left to discover before the outbreak is squelched.
The idea that any of these carriers will spread the virus while walking down the street or jogging in a park is not within reasonable scientific probability. A fluke outdoor transmission propelling the outbreak back into a crisis is even further out of realistic consideration.
What is shocking is that the Central Epidemic Command Center, in its easing of the level 3 COVID-19 alert on Thursday, kept the outdoor mask mandate in place while indicating that indoor dining is now safe. Although some jurisdictions are overriding that decision, the central government nonetheless seems to believe that the talking, coughing and sneezing that can accompany a meal — in a contained environment, often with poorly circulated air — poses no significant risk. That alone negates any argument for masking up on the street.
Wearing masks outdoors at this fading stage of the outbreak only reinforces false beliefs about how COVID-19 is transmitted, with profound results for mental and physical health.
Emotionally, the outdoor mask mandate creates paranoia regarding the air we breathe and the people we pass on the street. There is also the overlooked consequence of missing the smiles and facial cues of friends and neighbors, while having our noses blocked from the scents of our surroundings — the everyday aspects of life that provide a sense of belonging and connection.
Physically, masks reduce aerobic ability by 10 percent, which limits jogging, cycling and long walks to the healthiest individuals. Those who are less healthy or have underlying health conditions are the ones who have the most trouble being active in a mask and suffer more when they feel discouraged from going out.
The government should follow the science and let us put our masks back into our pockets when we are outside. It would make our communities healthier in a time of great anxiety.
Michael Riches is a copy editor at the Taipei Times.
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
RSS