If China does take over Taiwan, it would be a disaster for all; hopefully Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) realizes that.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry is focusing on microchip wafer fabs, starting from buying raw wafers to diffusion, photolithography, implantation, etching, and physical and chemical vapor deposition, before reaching the finished wafers — the front end of the process.
Taiwan also excels in packaging and testing, commonly known as the process’ back end. The whole process takes one-and-a-half to five months, commonly known as cycle time.
Although Taiwan ranks first in process integration in the world, the equipment used comes almost entirely from foreign companies: Applied Materials, Lam Research and KLA in the US; Hitachi, Toshiba, SECO, Sumitomo and Advantest in Japan; and ASML in the Netherlands — not to mention software from the US, such as programs from Synopsis and Cadence.
The most recent success in China by reverse engineering was only achieved with equipment from Applied Materials. As long as equipment imports are blocked, the Chinese semiconductor industry would be guaranteed to lag behind, because just reverse engineering will not do.
Some experts in the field have pinpointed this as the most critical and an almost insurmountable challenge for the Chinese semiconductor industry.
If its chip industry were to take over Taiwan’s facilities without equipment imports from the US, Japan and the Netherlands, Taiwan’s industry would shut down. Ironically, a shutdown of Taiwan’s chip industry would cause worldwide panic.
To avoid a chip shortage caused by a crisis in the Taiwan Strait, paired with the uncertain situation in North and South Korea, customers would inevitably force Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) to move abroad.
It takes billions of New Taiwan dollars to build and start operating a semiconductor fab. The US has the ability to create new technologies and design software, but has lost the ability to manufacture them.
TSMC was not built in a day. The US has many geniuses, but not enough engineers. Most US students do not like science, mathematics or engineering.
Even in my doctoral program in political science, most of the students and even professors did not have the mathematical skills to compete against my old classmates in a Taiwanese law school. Deplorable and sad.
TSMC has complained that the US does not have enough engineers with the necessary skills and experience. Nearly 80 percent of TSMC employees’ compensation comes from year-end bonuses based on the company’s profit. Can a US company allow that? Because of this, no matter how many employees China recruits from TSMC, it seldom fully utilizes them.
You might ask why the Chinese government has not subsidized the industry? It did, but if the compensation, no matter how high, is not aligned with the company’s and each employee’s performance, it would never be motivating enough for high-tech people. Throwing money on it would not help.
China will not invade Taiwan this year or next. Nor in 2023 or 2024, for that matter. A better strategy for Beijing is to ratchet up its rhetoric, and try to intimidate or pressure Taiwan in other ways.
Ironically, and from the perspective of realism in international relations, what if the US becomes self-sufficient in chips so that it and South Korea might want Taiwan to be taken over? It would cut down on the competition.
This is a complicated world, indeed.
Simon Tang is an adjunct professor of political science at California State University, Fullerton.
Weeks into the craze, nobody quite knows what to make of the OpenClaw mania sweeping China, marked by viral photos of retirees lining up for installation events and users gathering in red claw hats. The queues and cosplay inspired by the “raising a lobster” trend make for irresistible China clickbait. However, the West is fixating on the least important part of the story. As a consumer craze, OpenClaw — the AI agent designed to do tasks on a user’s behalf — would likely burn out. Without some developer background, it is too glitchy and technically awkward for true mainstream adoption,
A delegation of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) officials led by Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is to travel to China tomorrow for a six-day visit to Jiangsu, Shanghai and Beijing, which might end with a meeting between Cheng and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). The trip was announced by Xinhua news agency on Monday last week, which cited China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) Director Song Tao (宋濤) as saying that Cheng has repeatedly expressed willingness to visit China, and that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee and Xi have extended an invitation. Although some people have been speculating about a potential Xi-Cheng
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
The ongoing Iran conflict is putting Taiwan’s energy fragility on full display — the island of 23 million people, home to the world’s most advanced semiconductor manufacturing, is highly dependent on imported oil and gas, especially that from the Middle East. In 2025, 69.6 percent of Taiwan’s crude oil and 38.7 percent of liquified natural gas were sourced from the Middle East. In the same year, 62 percent of crude oil and 34 percent of LNG to Taiwan went through the Strait of Hormuz. Taiwan’s state-run oil company CPC Corp’s benchmark crude oil price (70 percent Dubai, 30 percent Brent)
RSS