Since the Taroko Express No. 408 derailment on April 2, there have once again been calls for the corporatization and privatization of the Taiwan Railways Administration (TRA).
Other countries have taken two approaches to the corporatization and privatization of state-owned railroads: vertical separation, such as in the EU and South Korea, and horizontal separation, such as in Japan, although part of the Japanese process involved vertical separation.
Vertical separation splits the trains from the railways. Using this approach, Taiwan’s railways would remain state-owned and maintained by the TRA, which would be responsible for construction safety, while the transportation services would be run by another state-run company or a private firm — it might even be opened up to competition.
STRATEGIC DIVISION
For example, when South Korea’s state-owned railways were reformed in 2005, the Korea National Railway, a government agency, became responsible for the hardware, while the state-run Korea Railroad Corp (Korail) became responsible for transportation services.
Korail is the Korea National Railway’s main client, while Korail’s customers are the train passengers. Since the reforms, operating profit has increased and the accident rate has declined sharply.
In the EU, the government remains responsible for maintaining the hardware, while transportation services are open to private operation.
This approach has been adopted in Taiwan’s communications industry. While the country’s communications networks and lines remain in the hands of Chunghwa Telecom, the state-run company has turned over equipment installations and service operations to network operators.
The TRA could also continue to maintain Taiwan’s railway hardware and a company could be formed to handle the nation’s transportation services, or services could be run by private companies, as the communications sector is doing.
BUNDLED APPROACH
The Japan Railways Group is a good example of horizontal separation. It owns several private railway companies and even some local railways. Railway ownership and operations remain bundled together, but several companies run the same routes.
Horizontal separation includes separation between passengers and cargo.
If the TRA adopted this approach, it could start by opening some of its routes to private companies, and once private operations proceeded smoothly, it could apply the approach nationwide.
Because labor unions react to the introduction of rail corporatization and privatization in many countries with weaponized strikes, the government should develop relevant measures in advance.
Public opinion also puts pressure on reform, and without public support, it is likely to fall short of success.
OPPORTUNE MOMENT
The government should use public calls for reform after the Taroko derailment as an opportunity to communicate that the corporatization and privatization of the TRA are inevitable.
The TRA this year is likely to add more than NT$3 billion (US$105.4 million) in losses to its overall deficit of NT$130 billion.
This puts into question its ability to add and improve services, and to increase construction and transportation safety.
Corporatization and privatization might not be a cure-all, but they would keep the TRA traveling toward the light at the end of the tunnel.
Shen Chen-lan is a physician.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing