Taichung Municipal Fengyuan High School has come under fire for a live simulation staged for its Terrorism and Anti-Terrorism course, in which students were asked to divide into groups and engage in combat armed with gel blasters.
A video on the Internet forum Baoliao Commune showed the losing team standing against a wall and being “executed” by the victors.
The Liberty Times (the sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) reported that the event took place last year as part of a national defense education program.
The exercise seems excessive and questionable, even though a former student said that participation was voluntary.
What is the point of this simulation?
While the nation’s education system has often been criticized as overly focused on academia and not very practical, there are many other more useful and relevant simulations that a school could organize outside of study time — such as wilderness survival or simulations of real working environments.
While gel blasters are touted as safe, nontoxic and biodegradable, they do cause pain.
In the video, students are seen rubbing their wounds, while one lifts his shirt to display a rash on his back.
The blasters are also known to cause damage if someone is hit in the eye — last year, a victim was treated for eye injuries after a random “drive-by” gel blaster shooting in Australia.
New laws have been enacted in Australia: It is now illegal in Queensland state to shoot someone without permission and those who do face a penalty of three to seven years in prison.
While there is nothing wrong with having fun with gel blasters if all participants agree to it, wear protection and fully understand the potential risks — just like paintball, boxing, judo or any combative sport — using them as a part of a national defense class, and adding a disturbing execution simulation at the end, is inappropriate.
The students being “executed” in the video were wearing regular school clothes without any protective gear.
There is no longer any possible scenario in Taiwan in which such a simulation would be relevant, so why revive disturbing scenes reminiscent of the rebellions against the Qing Dynasty or the Japanese, or the White Terror era in a school setting?
What is it supposed to teach the students, besides that the losers deserve no mercy and should be brutally murdered?
Fortunately, the school has agreed that the class was inappropriate — although it took an alumnus to post a video online for this decision to be reached.
The school principal has said that the classes have been canceled, and the gel blasters and other equipment removed from the school, but denied that the blasters could have caused any harm to the students, despite them not wearing any protection during the execution exercise.
It is a good thing that the alumnus spoke out and the class has been canceled.
More people need to speak out about these types of ridiculous school activities so that they can be consigned to the past.
During the long Lunar New Year’s holiday, Taiwan has shown several positive developments in different aspects of society, hinting at a hopeful outlook for the Year of the Horse, but there are also significant challenges that the country must cautiously navigate with strength, wisdom and resilience. Before the holiday break, Taiwan’s stock market closed at a record 10,080.3 points and the TAIEX wrapped up at a record-high 33,605.71 points, while Taipei and Washington formally signed the Taiwan-US Agreement on Reciprocal Trade that caps US tariffs on Taiwanese goods at 15 percent and secures Taiwan preferential tariff treatment. President William Lai (賴清德) in
As red lanterns adorn street corners and social media feeds teem with zodiac divinations, the Year of the Horse has arrived. In our hyper-accelerated age, the horse is almost exclusively synonymous with the idiom ma dao cheng gong (馬到成功) — “instant success upon arrival.” It is a linguistic shot of adrenaline, fueling the thrilling illusion that once the bell tolls, our lives would screech off into a cloud of dust, leaving all troubles behind. Yet, when examining the millennia-long partnership between humans and this magnificent “biological machine,” a different truth emerges. The true essence of the horse is not merely speed;
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Deputy Chairman Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑) earlier this month led a delegation to Beijing to attend a think tank forum between the KMT and Chinese Communist Party (CCP). After returning to Taiwan, Hsiao spoke at length about “accumulating mutual trust” and letting matters “fall into place,” portraying the forum as a series of discussions focused on cooperation in tourism, renewable energy, disaster prevention, emerging industries, health and medicine, and artificial intelligence (AI). However, when the entire dialogue presupposes the so-called “1992 consensus — the idea that there is only “one China,” with each side of the Taiwan
China has apparently emerged as one of the clearest and most predictable beneficiaries of US President Donald Trump’s “America First” and “Make America Great Again” approach. Many countries are scrambling to defend their interests and reputation regarding an increasingly unpredictable and self-seeking US. There is a growing consensus among foreign policy pundits that the world has already entered the beginning of the end of Pax Americana, the US-led international order. Consequently, a number of countries are reversing their foreign policy preferences. The result has been an accelerating turn toward China as an alternative economic partner, with Beijing hosting Western leaders, albeit
RSS