Many people have added their names to a signatory drive in support of a referendum on the construction of a liquefied natural gas (LNG) receiving station off Taoyuan’s Datan Borough (大潭). The proposed referendum is to ask: “Do you agree that CPC Corp, Taiwan’s liquid natural gas receiving station should be moved from the Datan algal reef coastal area in Taoyuan?”
The issue also involves the timeline for the gas supply to the seventh, eighth and ninth generators at the Datan Power Plant, whether there would be sufficient energy supply for northern Taiwan or if it would be necessary to transfer energy from southern Taiwan to the north, and if that would increase emissions from coal-fired power generation in central Taiwan.
The issue has angered many people. Proponents of nuclear power are demanding that the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant should be revived.
In addition, the referendum involves the government’s energy transition policy timeline. As an environmental engineer, I am offering a few thoughts on these issues:
First, the Ministry of Economic Affairs has said that moving the project to the Port of Taipei would extend the project by 11 years, and perhaps even more. This raises the question of whether it really would be impossible to handle a delay, and why a delay would be so bad.
The other question is whether other approaches to deal with the urgency or finding more diverse replacement solutions would be ineffective.
Developing a comprehensive energy solution would perhaps take about 30 years, and the facilities and solutions that are considered must therefore be more diverse and resilient to be able to address different scenarios. Many aspects, such as typhoons, air pollution, national security and military conflict, need to be taken into consideration for a long-term or permanent natural gas receiving station.
Second, there is the issue of the current state of the algal reefs, the impact of construction on the reefs, whether they can withstand several years of construction and if they would be able to recover. Whether they would recover is an issue for the experts, and requires further observation and research.
Some say that observations over the past year show that the reefs had been covered by sand due to currents and other factors, but that they have recovered after a while. CPC has pledged to adopt environmentally friendly construction methods. Yet, it has been discovered that boats used in construction have damaged the reefs, but has CPC been fined?
The impact of construction frequently spills over and causes pollution and destruction of the local environment, leading to opposition and protest among local residents.
Third, a delay of the receiving station could lead to coal-fired power plants burning more coal, which raises the question of whether it would be possible to improve end-point controls at those power plants.
From an environmental engineering perspective that is a feasible approach, as reduction of the emission of pollutants such as those smaller than 2.5 micrometers and nitrogen oxide at these end-points can be improved. This is an area where Taiwan Power Co’s power plants, including the Taichung Power Plant, should work hard to make improvements.
Whether or not the receiving station should be built and how construction should proceed is a matter that can be approached from a long-term, more comprehensive point of view.
For example, there are fears that there will be a 2 to 6 percent energy shortage, but the energy system currently has 10 to 15 percent reserve capacity.
Other approaches that could help address the issue include speeding up the construction of renewable energy sources, increased energy savings, distribution through intelligent electricity grids and increased energy storage capacity.
As to the referendum on the construction of the receiving station, Rescue Datan’s Algal Reefs Alliance convener Pan Chong-cheng (潘忠政) said that the reasons for initiating the referendum were a need to abandon nuclear power, reduce coal-fired power generation and concern for the algal reefs, as well as concern for climate change policy and national security.
Everyone is concerned that there will not be enough energy, but there is a group of nuclear power supporters who distort Pan’s calls into support for renewed use of nuclear power.
Even if construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant were to be restarted, it would be too late and would not solve the feared energy shortage. The solution, therefore, is to quickly start an energy transition plan and replace nuclear power with green energy.
Liu Jyh-jian is chairman of the Taiwan Environmental Protection Union.
Translated by Perry Svensson
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has
RSS