A report issued on Friday by the US intelligence community on the murder of Saudi Arabian journalist and permanent US resident Jamal Khashoggi in October 2018 at the Saudi consulate in Istanbul, Turkey, mostly confirms what we already knew.
The operation to capture or kill Khashoggi was approved by Mohammad bin Salman, Saudi Arabia’s crown prince and in many ways already the kingdom’s most powerful person.
MBS, as he is widely known, wanted Khashoggi dead, both to rid himself of a nettlesome critic and to intimidate other would-be critics of his rule.
We are unlikely to find a smoking gun, but MBS’ fingerprints are all over Khashoggi’s killing. There is not only abundant photographic and communications evidence that it was carried out by people close to the crown prince, there is also the simple reality that nothing of significant political magnitude happens in Saudi Arabia without MBS’ authorization.
Former president Donald Trump’s administration looked the other way at the time, as it often did in the face of flagrant human rights violations.
Moreover, Trump wanted to avoid a rupture with MBS, whose anti-Iran policies were appreciated and who was seen as central to his government’s willingness to purchase armaments from US manufacturers.
US President Joe Biden’s administration feels differently. It has already distanced the US from involvement in Saudi military operations in Yemen, and human rights are occupying a central role in its approach to the world.
That Biden has not communicated directly with MBS and instead called the ailing Saudi Arabian King Salman underscores Biden’s desire to separate the US relationship with the kingdom from the relationship with the crown prince.
However, this separation will likely prove impossible to sustain. The US is not in a position to prevent MBS’ ascension to the throne when his father dies. Any attempt to do so would almost certainly fail, in the process triggering a nationalist backlash, causing domestic instability, or both.
The US has many reasons to maintain a working relationship with an individual who will likely lead for decades a country that is critical to setting world energy prices, containing Iran, frustrating terrorism and, if it elects to do so, promoting Middle East peace.
Saudi Arabia is hardly the only country in the world where the US has to deal with a flawed leader. The Biden administration just signed an important nuclear arms control agreement with Russia, even though Russian President Vladimir Putin tried to kill — and has now imprisoned — his main political rival. The principal difference between him and the Saudi crown prince in this instance is their competence at eliminating opponents.
Or consider China. Biden administration officials have accused the Chinese government of carrying out genocide against the Uighur minority.
If so, they are accusing Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) of genocide, as there is no way what is taking place in Xinjiang region could happen without his approval. Yet Biden recently spoke with Xi and is sure to meet with him regularly to discuss North Korea, trade, climate change, and much else.
Biden is not wrong to strike deals with Putin and Xi. US strategic and economic interests demand it, and the US’ ability to influence Russian and Chinese behavior at home is limited.
The US can, and should, criticize and sanction, but it would be feckless and self-defeating to hold the entire bilateral relationship with Russia or China hostage to their domestic policies. Foreign policy is not about virtue-signaling; it is about advancing interests. Prioritizing and compartmentalizing are essential.
In the case of MBS, such realism might lead to opportunity. The promise of meetings with Biden administration officials should be traded for a firm commitment that the crown prince will never again target a political opponent in this way and that he will release imprisoned human rights advocates.
Bringing the Saudi Arabians into diplomacy might preserve the possibility of a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The United Arab Emirates agreed to normalize relations with Israel only when Israel agreed not to annex occupied Palestinian territory for at least three years.
MBS reportedly is ready to build bridges to Israel, but his father is not, and much of the Saudi Arabian population might resist.
Even an Israeli government committed to expanding Jewish settlements in the Occupied Territories might find it difficult to resist curbing them in exchange for peace and diplomatic ties with the kingdom.
It should be a long time before the now publicly exposed MBS is invited to the US, much less to the Oval Office.
However, refusing to deal with him is not the answer. Pragmatic, conditional relations with him could bring protection and freedom to many Saudi Arabians, make possible collaboration to impede Iran’s nuclear ambitions, wind down the war in Yemen and advance prospects for Israeli-Palestinian peace.
None of this would bring Khashoggi back to life, but it would give added meaning to his death.
Richard Haass, president of the Council on Foreign Relations, is the author of The World: A Brief Introduction.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing