Since the introduction of the New Southbound Policy during President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) first term in 2016, there has been building momentum toward increasing people-to-people exchanges between Taiwan and the policy’s 18 partner countries. While the government’s attempt to improve relations with these countries is admirable, there is a significant gap in Taiwan’s cultural knowledge of them. To narrow the cultural literacy gap, Taiwan needs to start cultural education as early as kindergarten.
New residents and migrant workers from these target countries in South Asia and Southeast Asia are particularly vulnerable in Taiwan.
Despite having more than 1 million foreigners from Southeast Asia in Taiwan, there remains a dearth of understanding of these countries’ cultures and traditions, which has led to multiple misunderstandings. Examples include strong opposition to the introduction of Southeast Asian languages in the school curriculum by some parents and bullying of children of migrant heritage for their accents and appearance.
To reduce misunderstandings and raise awareness, the government has conducted multiple cultural activities, such as observing Southeast Asian countries’ national days, but such efforts fall short due to a lack of coordination between government agencies.
As every county or city has its own policies, there are no proper guidelines on approaching cultural literacy. To decrease such gaps, individuals and groups have been trying to increase cultural awareness among Taiwanese about foreign cultures, especially those from the policy countries.
However, there is still room for improvement. One key aspect to look at is schools. Teaching students about cultures at a young age has considerable benefits. In the short term, it creates a better study environment for students of migrant backgrounds, and in the long term, it helps people to embrace the idea of a heterogeneous Taiwanese society.
According to Ministry of Education data, in 2018, there were more than 1.78 million students in elementary and junior-high schools — out of which 166,801 had an immigrant background, accounting for 9.36 percent of the total number of students. Even though these students make up a considerable part of the education system, there has been a low level of soft skill cultivation in kindergarten to 12th-grade education, including cross-cultural literacy.
Making students interact with people from different cultural backgrounds at a young age would allow them to see the world from a different perspective. Reading about any country besides their own opens up a world of mystery for a student. It would be a thrilling experience for them to interact with individuals from different countries and learn about their cultures in class.
Given a large community of migrants from Southeast Asia, the government should not miss the opportunity to harness their talents. Letting them come to the schools as part of a unique curriculum for Southeast Asian cultures, which goes beyond language learning, would lead to Taiwanese accepting their classmates from mixed or other cultures.
In my own experience sharing Indian culture in schools and universities and interacting with thousands of students across Taiwan, I have seen an abundance of knowledge about Western countries, in contrast to Southeast Asian or South Asian cultures, which are geographically closer to Taiwan.
The New Southbound Policy should make a two-way exchange of culture and education possible. There has been a push for talks at universities and within policymaking circles in the past. Yet, the failure to cultivate cross-cultural skills at the primary and secondary school level is a failure to effectively capitalize on the potential of early age cultural socialization. Thus, the government should encourage partnerships with schools from New Southbound Policy countries.
The COVID-19 pandemic has made travel difficult, forcing many schools worldwide to operate remotely. Digital platforms are used to learn and interact with students and teachers across Taiwan and New Southbound Policy countries. Such digitization of meetings would also save time and resources spent traveling.
Additionally, learning about the diverse cultures of these countries would definitely be a boon to the Taiwanese business community because of their increased investments there. It would help them properly manage the local workforce and create a friendly work environment.
Such knowledge of primary cultural traditions would also help reduce workplace violence, and would also facilitate further investments and mutual benefits to both sides.
With an increase in globalization, cultures have also seen changes. The way to look forward to a mutual understanding is to understand the culture. By doing so, we also increase respect for each other and social opportunities for everyone.
Manoj Kumar Panigrahi is a research fellow at the Taiwan Nextgen Foundation.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
RSS