The Taipei Department of Urban Development last week informed prospective tenants of the Minglun Social Housing project that they could move into their new homes in March. The recently built project is an 11-story complex with two basement floors on an 8,639m2 plot in Taipei’s Datong District (大同).
However, the project’s high rents — the monthly rent for a three-bedroom apartment is up to NT$40,500 — have stirred debate about housing justice. The complex is built on the site of the former Minglun Elementary School, which was shuttered in 2013 after the school merged with nearby Dalung Elementary School. The project is the first of its kind to be designed, constructed and completed under the administration of Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), and was touted by the city government as a step toward realizing housing justice and offering housing units that Taipei residents can afford.
The monthly rent for the most expensive three-bedroom units with an extra-large balcony has certainly raised eyebrows. However, the rent of NT$36,000 for a three-bedroom apartment designated for low-income households has also triggered discussion whether those units are affordable for the residents the city government targeted and whether the project is truly in the spirit of promoting housing justice. Even with rent subsidies, low-income households still cannot afford such apartments.
Ko’s remarks about the high rents have only sparked further controversy, as his reactions to criticism clearly discriminate against poor residents. For instance, he said that the city did not want social housing to accommodate just poor people. On another occasion, he said that low-income households should not aim to live in three-bedroom apartments.
Social housing is not only to provide homes to people at affordable rents, it also serves as a social safety net. Therefore, social housing should focus first on low-income people and gradually be opened to those with higher incomes when sufficient housing is built. In most social housing programs around the world, rents are calculated based on household income, rather than on the rental market.
The project’s rents were set based on the cost of construction, 55 years of management and operational costs, replacement costs, housing and land value taxes, and other fees, Taipei city councilors have said. Clearly, the city develops social housing with returns on investment in mind — whether social housing will be “self-liquidating,” as people call it here — and therefore it stresses fiscal discipline and sets the rents based on market mechanisms.
This touches upon some important points: First, the city seems intent on running the project like a business, as it places more attention on profits, losses and other financial metrics than on social value. Second, consumer protection regulations stipulate that property owners, not tenants, should pay housing and land value taxes, but in the case of Minglun, the city has included them in the total cost and wants all tenants to share the burden. Third, high rents coupled with the scarcity of social housing is likely to exclude low-income households from the city’s housing justice considerations.
Taiwan lags behind other advanced nations in building housing for poor people, and such projects are much fewer than regular housing developments. As of June last year, social housing accounted for just 0.18 percent of the nation’s total housing, statistics compiled by the Organization of Urban Re-s showed.
Building social housing is crucial to achieving housing justice, but more importantly, policymakers at local and central government level must understand social housing as part of the social safety net and calculate rents based on the income of the targeted group of residents.
To keep social housing development sustainable, real-estate-related tax reforms and the reallocation of public resources are the necessary next steps.
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) reportedly told the EU’s top diplomat that China does not want Russia to lose in Ukraine, because the US could shift its focus to countering Beijing. Wang made the comment while meeting with EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas on July 2 at the 13th China-EU High-Level Strategic Dialogue in Brussels, the South China Morning Post and CNN reported. Although contrary to China’s claim of neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, such a frank remark suggests Beijing might prefer a protracted war to keep the US from focusing on
RSS