Animal rights advocates have for years been calling for the establishment of an animal protection police force, but the proposal has been repeatedly shot down by government officials, citing a lack of resources and personnel.
The issue was brought up by lawmakers in December 2019 and again in April last year before the Taiwan Animal Protection Monitor Network held a conference reiterating the need on Wednesday last week.
Although animal welfare awareness has been growing in Taiwan, animal abuse and mistreatment continue, despite the strengthening of the Animal Protection Act (動物保護法) in 2017, making the need to establish an animal police force more prominent.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Democratic Progressive Party youth councils discussed the issue late last year, and, along with their counterparts from the Taiwan People’s Party and the New Power Party, last week agreed on the establishment of an animal police force.
Animal advocacy groups have said that animal protection officials often lack training in collecting evidence and other police skills, and as they do not work in shifts, they cannot immediately respond to calls at night. Furthermore, they do not have judicial authority and cannot arrest people or forcefully search premises, which can make people question their authority.
Police officers, on the other hand, already handle a large number of responsibilities and might lack the special knowledge or training needed to handle the animals they are trying to protect.
For instance, when animal protection officials in 2019 tried to inspect a cafe that was accused of abusing a pet fox, the owner got angry and shoved them out. The officials had to call the police for backup, and the shop owner was found guilty of contravening the Animal Protection Act.
This is an example of successful cooperation between the two agencies, but that often is not the case: Proponents of an animal police force say the process should be streamlined to increase efficiency, to avoid overlapping duties and agencies passing the buck. For example, when a dog was found poisoned to death, the responding police officer reportedly said it was an animal protection case, while animal protection said it was a criminal case that should be handled by police.
If even the agencies do not know who should handle such cases, how will people know who to call to report animal abuse?
When the issue was brought up last year, the National Police Agency said its police stations are capable of handling such cases — much to the chagrin of already overworked officers.
These examples show that the current system needs to be changed.
However, how an animal police force would be set up remains a question. Wu Chuang-hsien (吳宗憲), a professor at National University of Tainan, said that it could be patterned after the women and children’s protection units at local precincts — but police have repeatedly cited personnel shortages in response to such calls.
Wu also proposed modeling it after the National Police Agency’s Seventh Special Police Corps — but corps members are stationed only in certain areas and limited in number, and would not be able to respond to calls quickly. This defeats the purpose of increasing the efficiency of animal protection.
The issue needs to be dealt with — and quickly. Until a solution is worked out, the government should facilitate more dialogue between the agencies to establish a clearer understanding of responsibilities so that each police officer, protection official and citizen knows how to proceed when responding to animal abuse.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath