Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Johnny Chiang (江啟臣) on Thursday said that the party must face the mistakes it made during the White Terror era with honesty and humility, adding that “history cannot be forgotten.”
Chiang made the comments during a tour of the National Human Rights Museum in New Taipei City to commemorate International Human Rights Day and the 41st anniversary of the Kaohsiung Incident.
The 48-year-old Chiang was just 15 when martial law was lifted by then-president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) on July 15, 1987, and is at least two decades younger than prior chairs of the party responsible for martial law and the White Terror.
That age gap perhaps makes it easier for him to come out with statements like Thursday’s, but he is not the first KMT chair to call for the party to face up to its past.
In 1995, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝), who was also KMT chairman, became the nation’s first president to publicly apologize for the 228 Incident, and he vowed to publicize the truth behind the events of 228 and the White Terror era.
On Oct. 14, 2007, during a visit to Green Island (綠島) to see the prisons where so many White Terror victims wasted years of their lives, then-KMT presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) apologized to victims of political persecution and vowed to investigate several prominent cases of alleged political persecution once elected.
Ma — who had stepped down as KMT chair a few months before the visit, but who would become chairman again in 2009 — made similar promises once he was in the Presidential Office, several times reiterating a comment he made during that trip: “The KMT is choosing to face history with honesty, no matter how embarrassing the past may be for us.”
In practice, the KMT has not only fallen short of pledges to face up to its history, but also portrayed itself as the persecuted victim of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administrations, be it the current one or that of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁).
It challenged the constitutionality of the Act Governing the Handling of Ill-gotten Properties by Political Parties and Their Affiliate Organizations (政黨及其附隨組織不當取得財產處理條例) and the Ill-gotten Party Assets Settlement Committee before the Council of Grand Justices, but lost.
The KMT has battled the assets settlement committee’s investigations at every stage, just as it has battled to restrict access by the Transitional Justice Commission and the National Archives Administration to its archives, requiring its lawyers to be present when party records are examined.
It has repeatedly alleged that efforts to document and expose what happened during the White Terror era are “political persecution in the name of transitional justice,” and that its members and officials who challenge such efforts run the risk of becoming political prisoners.
KMT lawmakers and officials have condemned the National Communications Commission over its review of CTi News’ license renewal application, accusing it of carrying out a new “White Terror” by denying to renew the license.
The party’s flippant use of such terms as “political oppression,” “censorship” and “White Terror” when it criticizes the DPP brings into doubt its purported repentance for actions committed during martial law and its authoritarian regime.
The same day that he visited the National Human Rights Museum and said that “history cannot be forgotten,” Johnny Chiang said that criticism of the party has often come with “misunderstandings and distortions.”
The trouble is that the KMT’s distortions of history are hampering the nation’s efforts to move forward, because Taiwanese refuse to forget their history.
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to