Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Johnny Chiang (江啟臣) on Thursday said that the party must face the mistakes it made during the White Terror era with honesty and humility, adding that “history cannot be forgotten.”
Chiang made the comments during a tour of the National Human Rights Museum in New Taipei City to commemorate International Human Rights Day and the 41st anniversary of the Kaohsiung Incident.
The 48-year-old Chiang was just 15 when martial law was lifted by then-president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) on July 15, 1987, and is at least two decades younger than prior chairs of the party responsible for martial law and the White Terror.
That age gap perhaps makes it easier for him to come out with statements like Thursday’s, but he is not the first KMT chair to call for the party to face up to its past.
In 1995, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝), who was also KMT chairman, became the nation’s first president to publicly apologize for the 228 Incident, and he vowed to publicize the truth behind the events of 228 and the White Terror era.
On Oct. 14, 2007, during a visit to Green Island (綠島) to see the prisons where so many White Terror victims wasted years of their lives, then-KMT presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) apologized to victims of political persecution and vowed to investigate several prominent cases of alleged political persecution once elected.
Ma — who had stepped down as KMT chair a few months before the visit, but who would become chairman again in 2009 — made similar promises once he was in the Presidential Office, several times reiterating a comment he made during that trip: “The KMT is choosing to face history with honesty, no matter how embarrassing the past may be for us.”
In practice, the KMT has not only fallen short of pledges to face up to its history, but also portrayed itself as the persecuted victim of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administrations, be it the current one or that of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁).
It challenged the constitutionality of the Act Governing the Handling of Ill-gotten Properties by Political Parties and Their Affiliate Organizations (政黨及其附隨組織不當取得財產處理條例) and the Ill-gotten Party Assets Settlement Committee before the Council of Grand Justices, but lost.
The KMT has battled the assets settlement committee’s investigations at every stage, just as it has battled to restrict access by the Transitional Justice Commission and the National Archives Administration to its archives, requiring its lawyers to be present when party records are examined.
It has repeatedly alleged that efforts to document and expose what happened during the White Terror era are “political persecution in the name of transitional justice,” and that its members and officials who challenge such efforts run the risk of becoming political prisoners.
KMT lawmakers and officials have condemned the National Communications Commission over its review of CTi News’ license renewal application, accusing it of carrying out a new “White Terror” by denying to renew the license.
The party’s flippant use of such terms as “political oppression,” “censorship” and “White Terror” when it criticizes the DPP brings into doubt its purported repentance for actions committed during martial law and its authoritarian regime.
The same day that he visited the National Human Rights Museum and said that “history cannot be forgotten,” Johnny Chiang said that criticism of the party has often come with “misunderstandings and distortions.”
The trouble is that the KMT’s distortions of history are hampering the nation’s efforts to move forward, because Taiwanese refuse to forget their history.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS