This past weekend’s Tshing Shan Festival was touted as this winter’s headline event to boost Taipei’s local economy and tourism — but now it is under fire after scores of residents complained about noise from loudspeakers and firecrackers throughout the night.
Held by the Qingshan Temple (青山宮) in Wanhua District (萬華) from Friday through Sunday, the event is one of the city’s three biggest temple festivals. Although people have filed noise complaints in the past, this year’s festivities, expanded to mark the temple’s 165th anniversary, featured an unprecedented number of troupes and altars, greatly slowing down Sunday’s birthday procession for patron deity Qingshanwang (青山王).
It is not clear whether the event is to attain the same scale next year, but city officials are scrambling to ensure that it is kept under control. Yesterday, Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) met with temple officials, his office announcing that it would ramp up regulations, control and enforcement next year and work closely with the temple during the preparations.
The temple has apologized, saying that it would improve the event next year to reach a balance between cultural beliefs and modern concerns. It has vowed to modify the altar arrangement and the event’s progression so that it affects a smaller area and concludes earlier. This is not just for the benefit of the residents, it is also crucial to the temple, as local support and tolerance are necessary to keep such traditions alive.
The city lists the temple’s Friday and Saturday night processions as intangible cultural heritage events, vital Wanhua traditions that need to be preserved. While the processions are believed to protect local residents from evil spirits and diseases, rituals particularly relevant amid the COVID-19 pandemic, they ironically aggravated residents, which must be dealt with.
A big part of the debate is what to do about the firecrackers — some say that they should be banned altogether, while others say that they should be restricted to certain locations and hours. Safety concerns are legitimate, as firecrackers might have caused a building fire on Monday morning — an investigation is pending. Regardless, firecrackers need to be strictly regulated and not set off wantonly.
Traditions can be changed to fit modern needs, but as important as they are, they should not be excuses for polluting the environment. The modern-day format of the Tshing Shan Festival — especially the scale of this weekend’s events — has already departed from that of the past, with its modern flair and surrounding cultural events aimed at attracting bigger crowds.
In the old days, the festival was a community affair for those who experienced it growing up, but Wanhua’s new residents have little emotional connection with it. While the temple does its part to address residents’ complaints, the residents can also try to appreciate the history and traditions of their community.
While the noise should not continue as late into the night next year, the festival itself is not going away, which means that clamoring and commotion is likely to go on during acceptable hours. Will people just see this as a yearly nuisance or will they try to understand the festival’s significance? Only then will it regain its original sense of community spirit and continue to benefit future generations.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS