The European Parliament on Saturday last week passed two resolutions that support Taiwan’s bid to participate in the WHO.
French Minister of Foreign Affairs Jean-Yves le Drian also expressed support for Taiwan’s participation in World Health Assembly (WHA) and other international organizations during a parliamentary interpellation session on Wednesday last week.
This is the fourth time this year that Le Drian has voiced support for Taiwan’s international participation.
Due to Taiwan’s remarkable achievements in curbing the spread of COVID-19, many like-minded countries expressed support for Taiwan during the resumption of the annual WHA session last month.
Ministers of health from across the globe have underlined the importance of solidarity of all countries, but Taiwan is still excluded from the WHA.
Unlike WHO members, Taiwan is unable to acquire real-time COVID-19-related information, reports and technical assistance and unable to attend key meetings on vaccinations.
The COVID-19 pandemic has brought to light loopholes in the health security network we have dedicated so much effort to establish, and the pandemic has also revealed that our close-knit society has faced an unparalleled health threat and damage during this global crisis.
To fight COVID-19 and establish a better global health system, solidarity is needed from each country so that no one would be left behind and everyone’s well-being is protected.
The Foundation of Medical Professionals Alliance in Taiwan was in 1992 founded by a group of doctors who cared about Taiwan’s democracy and people’s health. With the support of many experts and civil society, the foundation has been leading the “Taiwan join the WHO” campaign.
We have visited more than 1,000 lawmakers and officials from different countries, and more than 500 foreign researchers and international organizations.
Since 1997, members of the foundation have gone each year to Geneva, Switzerland, where the WHA is held, to promote our cause and host Taiwan Night events to address our appeal, saying: “Taiwan should not be excluded from global health.”
To impress upon the global community that Taiwan must be included in the WHO to improve people’s health and welfare — which is in the spirit of the WHO constitution, which stipulates as a goal “the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health as a fundamental right of every human being” — the foundation has also visited foreign representative offices in Taiwan.
The foundation on Oct. 18 submitted an application to this year’s Human Rights Prize of the French Republic, which was in 1988 established to acknowledge the remarkable work of an individual or collective concerning human rights protection and promotion.
This year, the prize is to be awarded to those whose work is associated with protecting health rights, fighting social isolation, and sustaining an ecological environment and biodiversity.
Liberty, equality and fraternity are the core principles of the prize, and the principles the foundation has upheld for the past 25 years.
The pandemic has wreaked havoc on people’s health and welfare, and the progress of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals.
The global community should take this opportunity to let go of their political differences.
We hope that through participating in the selection process of the prize, more people realize our efforts in promoting human rights and public welfare, and improving cooperation in the Asia-Pacific region, as well as on the global scale.
Lin Shih-chia is the executive director of the Foundation of Medical Professionals Alliance in Taiwan.
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold