The European Parliament on Saturday last week passed two resolutions that support Taiwan’s bid to participate in the WHO.
French Minister of Foreign Affairs Jean-Yves le Drian also expressed support for Taiwan’s participation in World Health Assembly (WHA) and other international organizations during a parliamentary interpellation session on Wednesday last week.
This is the fourth time this year that Le Drian has voiced support for Taiwan’s international participation.
Due to Taiwan’s remarkable achievements in curbing the spread of COVID-19, many like-minded countries expressed support for Taiwan during the resumption of the annual WHA session last month.
Ministers of health from across the globe have underlined the importance of solidarity of all countries, but Taiwan is still excluded from the WHA.
Unlike WHO members, Taiwan is unable to acquire real-time COVID-19-related information, reports and technical assistance and unable to attend key meetings on vaccinations.
The COVID-19 pandemic has brought to light loopholes in the health security network we have dedicated so much effort to establish, and the pandemic has also revealed that our close-knit society has faced an unparalleled health threat and damage during this global crisis.
To fight COVID-19 and establish a better global health system, solidarity is needed from each country so that no one would be left behind and everyone’s well-being is protected.
The Foundation of Medical Professionals Alliance in Taiwan was in 1992 founded by a group of doctors who cared about Taiwan’s democracy and people’s health. With the support of many experts and civil society, the foundation has been leading the “Taiwan join the WHO” campaign.
We have visited more than 1,000 lawmakers and officials from different countries, and more than 500 foreign researchers and international organizations.
Since 1997, members of the foundation have gone each year to Geneva, Switzerland, where the WHA is held, to promote our cause and host Taiwan Night events to address our appeal, saying: “Taiwan should not be excluded from global health.”
To impress upon the global community that Taiwan must be included in the WHO to improve people’s health and welfare — which is in the spirit of the WHO constitution, which stipulates as a goal “the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health as a fundamental right of every human being” — the foundation has also visited foreign representative offices in Taiwan.
The foundation on Oct. 18 submitted an application to this year’s Human Rights Prize of the French Republic, which was in 1988 established to acknowledge the remarkable work of an individual or collective concerning human rights protection and promotion.
This year, the prize is to be awarded to those whose work is associated with protecting health rights, fighting social isolation, and sustaining an ecological environment and biodiversity.
Liberty, equality and fraternity are the core principles of the prize, and the principles the foundation has upheld for the past 25 years.
The pandemic has wreaked havoc on people’s health and welfare, and the progress of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals.
The global community should take this opportunity to let go of their political differences.
We hope that through participating in the selection process of the prize, more people realize our efforts in promoting human rights and public welfare, and improving cooperation in the Asia-Pacific region, as well as on the global scale.
Lin Shih-chia is the executive director of the Foundation of Medical Professionals Alliance in Taiwan.
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
China often describes itself as the natural leader of the global south: a power that respects sovereignty, rejects coercion and offers developing countries an alternative to Western pressure. For years, Venezuela was held up — implicitly and sometimes explicitly — as proof that this model worked. Today, Venezuela is exposing the limits of that claim. Beijing’s response to the latest crisis in Venezuela has been striking not only for its content, but for its tone. Chinese officials have abandoned their usual restrained diplomatic phrasing and adopted language that is unusually direct by Beijing’s standards. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs described the
RSS