The COVID-19 crisis has presented Europe with a once-in-a-generation opportunity to launch a new era of economic growth. If the private sector and governments across the EU work together on bold, innovative policies in the near term, they can address not only this crisis, but also foster steady business investment and the creation of good jobs well into the future.
The EU is moving forward with 750 billion euros (US$897 billion) of new stimulus spending as part of its Next Generation EU initiative, more than one-third of which is earmarked for projects related to climate change, including research into low-carbon solutions.
As this funding makes its way into the real economy, it is likely to broaden understanding of how climate-related investments can positively affect communities and businesses.
To ensure maximum impact, Capgemini Invent recently released “Fit for Net-Zero,” a first-of-its-kind economic analysis of the investment opportunities on offer at present.
Commissioned by Breakthrough Energy, a network of climate-oriented entities and initiatives backed by Microsoft co-founder and philanthropist Bill Gates, the report identifies 55 low-carbon, real-world projects across Europe that are ripe for investment.
Each project is geared toward scaling up new technologies and business models that would help Europe achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, and all sit within one of five crucial sectors: energy, industry, buildings, transport and agriculture.
Moreover, each project is at a different level of maturity, representing the full spectrum of the innovation cycle, from early-stage demonstration to late-stage deployment, which helps diversify risk.
Together, these projects have the potential to reinvigorate and transform Europe’s economy.
According to our report, developing and deploying these projects can create a 12.9 trillion euro market opportunity, support 12.7 million jobs and help the EU achieve its ambitious emissions-reduction goals by the middle of this century.
To have such an outsize effect, each project requires its own mix of private-sector creativity and capital investment, in addition to public funding and an appropriately aligned policy framework from the EU and its 27 member states.
What do these innovative projects look like, and what policies are needed to support them? Consider floating offshore wind. Europe’s nearshore shallow seas are already crowded with wind turbines, but until recently, it has been much too expensive to develop wind farms in the deep water where 80 percent of Europe’s offshore wind-generating potential is found.
By building 100 large-scale floating wind farms by 2030 in the Baltic and North seas, and in the Atlantic Ocean, this vast potential can begin to be unlocked, and renewable energy production in countries like Portugal, Sweden and Estonia can be rapidly scaled up.
On the policy front, programs such as Horizon Europe, the EU’s primary funding vehicle for research and innovation, can accelerate advances in blade design and ultimately drive down costs for turbines that do not need to be permanently fixed onto the seabed.
Another promising investment area is in “Agriculture 4.0.” In Europe’s agriculture sector, the rate of uptake of digital technologies lags behind what is happening in other major industries, owing to margin constraints on farm equipment and a relative lack of investment capacity.
If farmers, technology companies, universities and others work together to identify best practices for farming technologies — such as satellite imaging, robotics and blockchain — they could create a 10 billion euro market by 2050 that would also help drive down emissions.
By bringing agriculture fully into the digital age, the sector can be made more appealing for a younger generation of farmers who want to maximize efficiencies in how fruit and vegetables are grown, livestock is raised, and arable land and forests are managed.
Finally, there are many opportunities in the renovation of public buildings. Schools, hospitals and other public facilities are vital to any community, but in Europe, they tend to be among the oldest and least energy-efficient forms of infrastructure. All told, buildings in Europe account for 40 percent of EU energy consumption.
Aided by new digital-modeling techniques, renovating public buildings across Europe with cutting-edge materials such as aerogel insulation and vacuum-glazed windows, which improve insulation while increasing penetration of natural light, could slash carbon dioxide emissions, reduce public energy costs and support 660,000 local jobs.
Policy measures to help increase EU-wide renovation rates to at least 3 percent annually include the just-announced Renovation Wave, investments in workforce development and measures to decarbonize the construction industry’s value chains.
Even with all their potential, these three investment areas barely scratch the surface of what is possible in Europe. Other projects include giga-factories to manufacture lithium-ion batteries, new forms of urban mobility such as shared autonomous vehicles, insect proteins to lower livestock emissions and “green hydrogen” to cut emissions at Europe’s roughly 500 steel plants.
Achieving a low-carbon future demands innovation. Identifying these projects now lays down the latest marker on Europe’s path to net-zero emissions by 2050, and to establishing the region as the global leader in the climate technology markets that the world could increasingly rely on.
As the EU recovery money allocated to fight climate change starts flowing into the economy, it must be ensured that political and industry leaders at all levels focus on commonsense, coordinated policymaking that promotes and adequately supports low-carbon research and innovation.
Developing and scaling up new technologies is hard. More to the point, it takes time, which is a resource that can no longer be spared.
Ann Mettler, senior director for Breakthrough Energy, was head of the European Political Strategy Centre, the in-house think tank of the European Commission. Cyril Garcia, chief executive of Capgemini Invent, is a member of the Capgemini Group executive board.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath