Media bias is inevitable
The National Communications Commission (NCC) announced on Wednesday last week that CTiTV News’ broadcast license would be revoked. All seven NCC regulators rejected the license renewal for CTiTV’s news channel. The news outlet has been accused of disseminating “fake news,” biased reports, disinformation, and being blatantly pro-China in its views and reporting.
To be sure this last point is not popular in Taiwan nowadays.
There have apparently been many complaints against CTiTV News from the public, but one might ask how many of those complaints came from the public at large, and how many from biased politicians.
It should be understood that a news outlet expressing views slanted in one political direction or another is not a truly valid reason for grief or criticism. In Taiwan just mentioning China in a news report would yield condemnation and protest from many citizens.
In terms of media bias, CTiTV News might be guilty of such transgressions, but the truth is that virtually all media outlets are often lopsidedly biased in their stance and reporting. Without question this can be said about any number of media organizations in Taiwan. Who after all would not say this about the pro-Taiwan-independence Liberty Times, the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper?
The Taipei Times’ own bias is clear enough, but the paper tends to keep its cards close to its chest.
It has been reported that 20 politicians from the Democratic Progressive Party had investments in the operations of 35 pro-DPP cable television systems. That says a lot about just how many television systems in Taiwan are biased in this direction.
To be sure the same can be said of the US. CNN, unashamedly anti-US President Donald Trump, could not be much worse in terms of biased reporting and views. The media outlet makes no secret of, nor any effort to hide, its preferences. I am not sure about the accusations of “fake news” against CNN, but the bias remains.
Let us not even talk about pro-Trump Fox News, a media organization notorious for its bigoted views and reporting. Again, such media bias is simply a fact of life in the industry. What media organization worth its name would not want to stake out strong opinions and views in one political direction or another?
Media professionals are always keen to avoid any such labels, but who can doubt the truth about the media outlets mentioned above? (CNN’s Jake Tapper argues vociferously with Republican lawmakers virtually every week.) This truth remains in such two-party systems as the US and Taiwan: All media outlets are biased one way or another.
Freedom of expression runs in many different directions, and some of these might not be very comfortable, but that does not change the essential foundation and rules of what free democracy is all about — that is, a free press.
Make no mistake, Trump and his minions might make the worst noise and outlandish claims in these respects, but they have never shut down a media organization that I know of. This puts the NCC’s move in a very dark light.
Yes, CTiTV News might lack effective internal control mechanisms, but what exactly does this mean and indicate? To what extent should media “control” itself at all, and from there, to what extent is the government going to step in and do the controlling via censorship and various restrictions to freedom of the press? Not many committed citizens desire this.
It is fair to ask whether being pro-one thing or another is a valid reason for discontinuing any news outlet’s right to report news. This might be the most important lesson we are on the verge of relearning during all of this.
David Pendery
Taipei
With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization. The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House. Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time. The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
Since the end of the Cold War, the US-China espionage battle has arguably become the largest on Earth. Spying on China is vital for the US, as China’s growing military and technological capabilities pose direct challenges to its interests, especially in defending Taiwan and maintaining security in the Indo-Pacific. Intelligence gathering helps the US counter Chinese aggression, stay ahead of threats and safeguard not only its own security, but also the stability of global trade routes. Unchecked Chinese expansion could destabilize the region and have far-reaching global consequences. In recent years, spying on China has become increasingly difficult for the US