The first Taiwan-US Economic Prosperity Partnership (EPP) Dialogue was on Friday held virtually and in person in Washington, and it covered a broad range of issues including the US’ Clean Network program, supply chain cooperation, science and technology cooperation, infrastructure development, energy, investment review, global health and security, and women’s economic empowerment.
After a six-hour discussion, the talks on technology cooperation concluded with the most concrete outcome as both sides identified the semiconductor industry as the top priority.
The EPP Dialogue reflects both sides’ commitment to expanding cooperation and deepening their already close friendship, and represents another milestone in Taiwan-US relations.
The US in May became Taiwan’s second-largest export market for the first time in 11 years, and city officials in Phoenix, Arizona, on Wednesday approved a slew of financial incentives and government support for Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) planned US$12 billion chip plant, its first advanced manufacturing facility in the US. The plan for the 5-nanometer fab has prompted some TSMC suppliers to consider following suit.
US lawmakers have been taking measures to boost domestic high-tech manufacturing and address national security concerns over the industry supply chain, including in June proposing billions of US dollars in subsidies. The improved trade and business ties, particularly in the semiconductor and 5G industries, are expected to boost relations between Taiwan and the US.
Taiwanese companies are paying great attention to the implementation of supply chain cooperation in the semiconductor industry between the two nations and are looking forward to this partnership expanding to 5G, electric vehicles, as well as medical, energy and other technology segments. Even though the local business community expects the EPP Dialogue to pave the way for bilateral trade agreement negotiations, it is not likely to happen quickly, as a such a deal would be discussed through the Trade and Investment Framework Agreement platform.
However, there is no doubt that the EPP Dialogue reflects the trend that bilateral trade relations in the near future could progress further, and it is more than that: The Dialogue enables Taiwan to grasp the US’ economic strategy planning and gives Taiwanese firms an idea of what opportunities might come their way in bilateral cooperation.
For instance, the US’ push for a Clean Network of trusted partners is to move US production and supply chain dependency away from China, and the EPP Dialogue gives Taiwanese companies access to the US-led supply chain realignment.
As the concept of alternative supply chains is not only being promoted by the US, with countries such as Australia, India and Japan, and even the EU announcing plans to reduce their dependence on China, Taiwan must seize the opportunity.
In other words, the significance of the EPP Dialogue goes beyond the expectation of trade agreement negotiations, it also brings Taiwan closer to the US’ economic strategies and offers opportunities for Taiwanese firms.
Moreover, it helps Taiwan prepare for potential dialogues of the same kind with other major economies and ensures that its companies will not be absent from future bilateral or multinational cooperations.
While Taiwanese firms are expected to face more competition after the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, signed by 15 Asia-Pacific nations on Nov. 15, takes effect, the continued US-China tensions, as well as the anti-China sentiment in many democratic countries, could work in Taiwan’s favor.
The effect of lower tariffs would be less important for other nations than having trustworthy partners such as Taiwan.
Since the end of the Cold War, the US-China espionage battle has arguably become the largest on Earth. Spying on China is vital for the US, as China’s growing military and technological capabilities pose direct challenges to its interests, especially in defending Taiwan and maintaining security in the Indo-Pacific. Intelligence gathering helps the US counter Chinese aggression, stay ahead of threats and safeguard not only its own security, but also the stability of global trade routes. Unchecked Chinese expansion could destabilize the region and have far-reaching global consequences. In recent years, spying on China has become increasingly difficult for the US
Lately, China has been inviting Taiwanese influencers to travel to China’s Xinjiang region to make films, weaving a “beautiful Xinjiang” narrative as an antidote to the international community’s criticisms by creating a Potemkin village where nothing is awry. Such manipulations appear harmless — even compelling enough for people to go there — but peeling back the shiny veneer reveals something more insidious, something that is hard to ignore. These films are not only meant to promote tourism, but also harbor a deeper level of political intentions. Xinjiang — a region of China continuously listed in global human rights reports —
The annual summit of East Asia and other events around the ASEAN summit in October and November every year have become the most important gathering of leaders in the Indo-Pacific region. This year, as Laos is the chair of ASEAN, it was privileged to host all of the ministerial and summit meetings associated with ASEAN. Besides the main summit, this included the high-profile East Asia Summit, ASEAN summits with its dialogue partners and the ASEAN Plus Three Summit with China, Japan and South Korea. The events and what happens around them have changed over the past 15 years from a US-supported, ASEAN-led
To the dismay of the Chinese propaganda machine, President William Lai (賴清德) has been mounting an information offensive through his speeches. No longer are Taiwanese content with passively reacting to China’s encroachment in the international window of discourse, but Taiwan is now setting the tone and pace of conversation. Last month, Lai’s statement that “If China wants Taiwan it should also take back land from Russia” made international headlines, pointing out the duplicity of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) revanchism. History shows that the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) stance on regional territorial disputes has not been consistent. The early CCP
RSS