The first Taiwan-US Economic Prosperity Partnership (EPP) Dialogue was on Friday held virtually and in person in Washington, and it covered a broad range of issues including the US’ Clean Network program, supply chain cooperation, science and technology cooperation, infrastructure development, energy, investment review, global health and security, and women’s economic empowerment.
After a six-hour discussion, the talks on technology cooperation concluded with the most concrete outcome as both sides identified the semiconductor industry as the top priority.
The EPP Dialogue reflects both sides’ commitment to expanding cooperation and deepening their already close friendship, and represents another milestone in Taiwan-US relations.
The US in May became Taiwan’s second-largest export market for the first time in 11 years, and city officials in Phoenix, Arizona, on Wednesday approved a slew of financial incentives and government support for Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) planned US$12 billion chip plant, its first advanced manufacturing facility in the US. The plan for the 5-nanometer fab has prompted some TSMC suppliers to consider following suit.
US lawmakers have been taking measures to boost domestic high-tech manufacturing and address national security concerns over the industry supply chain, including in June proposing billions of US dollars in subsidies. The improved trade and business ties, particularly in the semiconductor and 5G industries, are expected to boost relations between Taiwan and the US.
Taiwanese companies are paying great attention to the implementation of supply chain cooperation in the semiconductor industry between the two nations and are looking forward to this partnership expanding to 5G, electric vehicles, as well as medical, energy and other technology segments. Even though the local business community expects the EPP Dialogue to pave the way for bilateral trade agreement negotiations, it is not likely to happen quickly, as a such a deal would be discussed through the Trade and Investment Framework Agreement platform.
However, there is no doubt that the EPP Dialogue reflects the trend that bilateral trade relations in the near future could progress further, and it is more than that: The Dialogue enables Taiwan to grasp the US’ economic strategy planning and gives Taiwanese firms an idea of what opportunities might come their way in bilateral cooperation.
For instance, the US’ push for a Clean Network of trusted partners is to move US production and supply chain dependency away from China, and the EPP Dialogue gives Taiwanese companies access to the US-led supply chain realignment.
As the concept of alternative supply chains is not only being promoted by the US, with countries such as Australia, India and Japan, and even the EU announcing plans to reduce their dependence on China, Taiwan must seize the opportunity.
In other words, the significance of the EPP Dialogue goes beyond the expectation of trade agreement negotiations, it also brings Taiwan closer to the US’ economic strategies and offers opportunities for Taiwanese firms.
Moreover, it helps Taiwan prepare for potential dialogues of the same kind with other major economies and ensures that its companies will not be absent from future bilateral or multinational cooperations.
While Taiwanese firms are expected to face more competition after the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, signed by 15 Asia-Pacific nations on Nov. 15, takes effect, the continued US-China tensions, as well as the anti-China sentiment in many democratic countries, could work in Taiwan’s favor.
The effect of lower tariffs would be less important for other nations than having trustworthy partners such as Taiwan.
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Shen You-chung (沈有忠) on Thursday last week urged democratic nations to boycott China’s military parade on Wednesday next week. The parade, a grand display of Beijing’s military hardware, is meant to commemorate the 80th anniversary of Japan’s surrender in World War II. While China has invited world leaders to attend, many have declined. A Kyodo News report on Sunday said that Japan has asked European and Asian leaders who have yet to respond to the invitation to refrain from attending. Tokyo is seeking to prevent Beijing from spreading its distorted interpretation of wartime history, the report
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase
RSS