An increasing number of cafes and other businesses in Taiwan are keeping animals, which draw in people who are seeking the next perfect shot for their Instagram accounts.
In the past these were mostly standard house pets, such as cats and dogs, which are accustomed to living indoors and being around people.
However, raccoons have become popular, as well as alpacas and other “unusual” animals that require specialty care and specific environments to thrive.
In late June, a customer recorded a video of the owner of a coffee shop in Taipei apparently unleashing a border collie on a raccoon, who was the star attraction at the business. When other allegations of abuse surfaced, the Animal Protection Office took away the raccoon and fined the owner, who later apologized to the public.
While it is legal to own a raccoon in Taiwan and there are the Regulations Governing the Management of Performing Animals (動物展演管理辦法), it is difficult to apply those rules to pets at cafes, Taipei City Councilor Yang Ching-yu (楊靜宇) said on Friday last week.
Yang, a veterinarian, urged the city to introduce an ordinance regulating how to treat animals in workplaces to prevent abuse, as fining people is not enough of a deterrent.
On Monday, Taichung City Councilor Huang Shou-ta (黃守達) cited accounts of raccoons at stores self-harming or exhibiting repetitive behavior due to inadequate space, and rabbits huddling in fear after prolonged close contact with people.
There are only two firms in Taichung that have licenses for performing animals, but there are numerous stores that use animals to attract customers in scenarios that fall outside the law.
Huang said that unless the animals are blatantly abused and kept in poor conditions, there is nothing the city can do.
The majority of business owners with in-store animals love them and have done their homework about providing adequate care, but due to Instagram’s explosive popularity, such businesses are becoming extremely lucrative. As the trend grows and more people jump on the bandwagon to make a quick buck, there will only be more cases of malpractice. How many people know how to care for a raccoon or an alpaca?
Regulations are definitely needed, but as several experts said in response to Yang’s report, they would be tricky to enforce. Some owners might not be using the animals to promote their business, but simply have pets at work or care for strays. Requirements and sanctions need to be clearly laid out so there is as little ambiguity as possible, and city resources are not wasted.
There should be limitations on what kinds of animal can be kept at a store, otherwise unscrupulous owners might keep acquiring increasingly unusual and difficult to care for pets as gimmicks to stand out among the competition.
Raccoons are difficult enough. In mating season, the males become territorial and aggressive, so they must be kept away from people.
More importantly, requiring an application to own such an animal, introducing licensing and enforcing animal welfare courses for specific animals before a business can use an animal to attract customers would at least make people think twice before doing so.
This would bring awareness that people cannot treat animals however they want.
There are few coincidences in the world of foreign diplomacy. Two days after a Japanese government donation of AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines arrived in Taiwan on Friday last week, a US delegation led by US senators Tammy Duckworth, Dan Sullivan and Chris Coons touched down at Taipei International Airport (Songshan airport) in a US military transport aircraft, which flew in from Osan Air Base in South Korea. The cross-party delegation of US senators announced that Washington would donate 750,000 COVID-19 vaccine doses to Taiwan in the first wave of the US Foreign Vaccine Sharing Program. Japan and the US’ vaccine donations are
Over the past year, scores of gargantuan Chinese sand dredgers have deployed themselves in territorial waters off the Taiwanese-administered Matsu Islands, where their activities erode beaches and ruin fishing shoals. These Chinese ships are mercenary; a small 5,000 ton ship could sell a load of sand for the equivalent of US$55,000 to Fujian construction firms — or to the People’s Liberation Army for use in building its artificial reefs in the South China Sea. They also frustrate Taiwan’s government, which tries unsuccessfully to cooperate with Beijing on environmental stewardship of their contiguous waters. Each day, Taiwanese Coast Guard vessels can
US President Joe Biden has directed an intensive study of the origin of the coronavirus pandemic. In the process of that review, the intelligence community also should look at the larger question: Did China take advantage of the pandemic’s ravaging spread as a limited form of biological warfare against its perceived adversaries? The notion, as unthinkable as it might seem, is no longer as implausible or paranoid as it was earlier portrayed. Mounting questions and evidence have cast doubt on the likelihood that the deadly pathogen sprang naturally from an animal to human. Governments outside China are focusing attention on