Developing green energy is one of the major industry policies that President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) pledged when she started her first term in office in 2016. Based on the Tsai administration’s guidelines, renewable energy is to make up 20 percent of the nation’s total power generation in 2025 and solar power is to have the lion’s share with a contribution of 20 gigawatts (GW).
The goal of building 3GW of rooftop solar panels was reached last year, ahead of schedule, as panels have been installed on roofs of schools, government agencies, factories and houses.
However, projects involving ground-mount solar panels and solar arrays built on top of fish farms have hit a wall: Only 20 percent of newly installed solar power last year was ground-mount systems. The main reason for that is a shortage of land.
“It would be more than satisfactory to see as much as 1.5GW — same with last year — of ground-mount solar power installed,” Sharon Chen (陳君盈), a solar industry analyst who used to work for TrendForce Corp, told an industry forum last week.
The Bureau of Energy had planned for 2.2GW of ground-mount solar energy to come online this year to bring the total ground-mount solar power generation capacity to 6.5GW. However, it has lowered the target.
Due to land scarcity, the bureau said it has to set a more “practical” target and reduced the ground-mount solar power installation target to 14GW, from 17GW, by 2025.
The government has not come up with any substantial solutions. Land availability remains the biggest hurdle faced by solar power developers. It took three-and-a-half years to connect the nation’s first solar power plant on 25 hectares of fish farms to Taiwan Power Co’s grid, with much of the time spent on obtaining approval from numerous fish farm owners, United Renewable Energy Co solar business group president Andy Shen (沈維鈞) said last week.
Compounding the issue, the Council of Agriculture in July barred renewable energy developers from placing solar panels on farmland — known as agrivoltaics — over concerns that the crops would not receive sufficient sunlight, resulting in lower yields. However, a growing number of international studies show that agrivoltaics can benefit crop yields as well as solar energy developers, but the council turned a deaf ear to the findings and insisted that solar energy developers focus on rooftop solar panels and fish farm arrays, instead of agrivoltaics, going directly against the Cabinet’s renewable energy policy.
The council’s inflexibility significantly reduces the amount of land that can be used for solar power generation and jeopardizes the government’s goal of substituting 20GW of electricity derived from coal with solar power by 2025, the Taiwan Photovoltaic Industrial Association has said.
The Cabinet has promised to help overcome the inconsistencies among government agencies and the Ministry of Economic Affairs has said farmland should be utilized “smartly.”
However, no progress has been made. Solar power developers are still facing the challenge of finding plots of land to erect ground-mount solar panels.
“Some council officials are playing tricks to hinder solar energy development,” United Renewable chairman Sam Hong (洪傳獻) said last week.
It is clear that conflicts between government agencies is the main obstacle to the nation’s energy transformation. To speed up its development, the government needs to resolve the conflicts, while making sure renewable energy does not come at the expense of farmers’ livelihoods and the environment.
I think it is fair to say there is a widespread sigh of relief among many Americans — particularly those of us focused on foreign policy — that the chaotic and unpredictable Trump years will soon be over. Mr. Trump brought little real knowledge or experience to his foreign policy, and it showed. He also — in my humble opinion — did not err on the side of expertise in his choice of top foreign policy officials. Nor was he particularly open to listening to advice. All in all a poor set of traits for overseeing the complex foreign policy
After more than eight years of talks, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) was signed on Nov. 15, combining the individual free-trade agreements signed between ASEAN member states on the one hand, and China, Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand on the other. Under the leadership of ASEAN and China, most observers did not expect the RCEP to provide a high degree of openness, and the announced agreement lives up to these expectations, containing few surprises. All products covered by the RCEP tariff reductions are agricultural and industrial products, but reductions of agricultural product tariffs are very limited, for example covering
While the nation grapples with its falling birthrate, it is also imperative to address how parents are raising their children. The phenomenon of “dinosaur parents” — who lash out at teachers, store staff or people on the street when confronted about their children misbehaving — has been an issue for a while, but there seems to be an uncomfortably high number of incidents making the news lately. On Saturday, a preschool teacher on an online forum wrote about a mother who often visited the school and screamed at the staff for various reasons — including her child being late to school
On Nov. 14, Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) commented on the nation’s low birthrate, claiming that young people would surely have children if only they married first, and that the low marriage rate among young people is the cause of the rapid aging of Taiwan’s society. The Taipei City Government therefore proposed to offer subsidies to couples willing to marry. Ko’s comment stirred up a great deal of protest. As a sociology student, I would like to remind the mayor that his remarks not only decontextualized the population aging issue, but also oversimplified the low birthrate problem. First, a look at systemic