In the Kaohsiung mayoral by-election in August, Kaohsiung City Councilor Jane Lee (李眉蓁) — the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) candidate — stirred controversy for having plagiarized her master’s thesis.
Although her degree was revoked and the case seems to have ended, the underlying problem remains. It is time to look into what structural flaws lead to repeated occurrence of such incidents.
As a local politician, Lee tried to leverage her political capital to obtain a postgraduate degree. When her plagiarism was exposed, she quickly renounced her degree as her survival instinct kicked in.
However, things would look different if somebody with a strong academic background obtained their qualifications in ways that violated academic ethics and were exposed after having attaining a powerful position.
Since the 1990s, Taiwan has not only undergone liberalization and democratization, but also a process of academic standardization. The problem is that since the authoritarian rulers of the 1970s had almost complete control of academia, standardization has been a means for the remaining fragments of the authoritarian era to preserve their power. A lack of academic transitional justice has turned academia into an arena for power games.
With control of the National Science Council — now the Ministry of Science and Technology — those in power used it to approve or deny research projects to nurture their own academic power bases.
Using improvement of academic standards as an excuse, they rated academic journals based on their own criteria to gain complete control of academia.
It is often said that the truth becomes clearer the more it is debated, but in democratic Taiwan, academic debate is becoming increasingly difficult.
In the field of history, for example, debate and refutations are even rarer than during the Martial Law era. It is not that historians are no longer willing to engage in debate, but rather that dissenting views often have been silenced by those in power.
Academic debates are communication and exchanges of opinion among people who have reached a high standard. They promote academic progress.
However, debate is not given full protection, which is concerning for Taiwan’s academic development.
Those who breach academic ethics do not pay much attention to academic standards, but unfortunately, people who uncover abuses are often regarded by those in power as traitors — leading to oppression and marginalization.
This situation is no different from the treatment of the dangwai (黨外, “outside the party”) dissidents who questioned the legitimacy of the then-KMT regime.
Without proper supervision, those in power can act as they please, so how can anyone say that there is academic freedom in Taiwan?
Academia must push for thorough reform — such as decentralization, public governance, a balance between power and responsibility, and abolishing the rating system for academic journals — and encourage open and transparent debate, while establishing a mechanism to revoke degrees or publications of people who violate academic ethics.
If this is not done and if those in power retain the authority to decide who succeeds while covering each other’s back, academic freedom will continue to be suppressed and eventually disappear altogether.
Chen Chun-kai is a professor of history at Fu Jen Catholic University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.