At 3:30pm on Wednesday, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson sat down for a 90-minute interrogation in parliament, but there was one question he could not answer: Whether a top UK government law officer had quit.
Scotland’s advocate general Richard Keen had resigned because he could not reconcile his role as a lawyer with Johnson’s explosive plan to rewrite the Brexit deal and break international law.
The Internal Market Bill had already provoked storm at home and abroad that the prime minister — with all his charisma— his aides — with all their cunning — could not contain.
The prime minister and his team tried all day to persuade Keen to change his mind, and were still trying when Johnson arrived to give evidence to the British House of Commons Liaison Committee.
When he was asked if Keen was still in his post, Johnson was forced to admit he did not know.
“All I can tell you is that, as far as I know, conversations on that matter are still continuing,” he said.
Later that evening, Johnson was forced to concede defeat, and accept Keen was going. Despite his record of charming his way out of trouble, Johnson’s magic touch had found its limits.
It was an extraordinary glimpse into the chaos that has engulfed the British leader as a result of his proposal to renege on the exit treaty with the EU signed in January.
Adding to the sense of disarray, the whole row was a mistake rather than a deliberate negotiating tactic, according to one British official.
Many Conservatives already feared their leader was losing his grip even before the blunder over the bill.
Now Johnson’s strategy for a free-trade pact with the EU before the end of the year is in tatters.
trust at rock bottom
The two sides are miles apart, publicly trading blows and accusing each other of acting in bad faith. In private, European officials say trust in the British side is at rock bottom.
Brexit has had more than its fair share of turmoil over the past four years, and the British side is still confident this is just another temporary upset to the process of forging a new relationship with the continent.
Yet with six weeks left to resolve the impasse, and avert the threat of tariffs, quotas and upheaval at the UK border, even some in Johnson’s team are privately fearful of the damage the row has caused.
The furor was partly of the prime minister’s own making. The contentious element of the bill involves changes to the protocol for Northern Ireland, which shares a land border with the EU.
On Sept. 8, his team sent Northern Ireland Secretary Brandon Lewis into the House of Commons and told him to make clear that the legislation would break international law in a “specific and limited way.”
Lewis did his job and was then vilified by opponents and allies alike.
All five living former prime ministers raised grave concerns over the move.
On Friday, Amal Clooney added to the chorus of dismay by quitting her role as the UK’s special envoy on media freedom.
The EU was baffled at why the UK should take such a step, especially when the mood in the room during trade talks had been improving in recent weeks.
Officials in Brussels wasted no time in drawing up plans to take legal action against the UK for breaking the exit agreement treaty.
BLIGHTING UK’S FUTURE?
EU Head of Task Force for Relations with the UK Michel Barnier told European diplomats last week that the British moves showed bad faith and it was up to London to do something to rebuild trust.
The controversy also threatens to blight Britain’s future outside the bloc as a global free trading nation.
In Washington, British Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs Dominic Raab was on a mission to reassure worried politicians that Britain’s intentions toward Northern Ireland were honorable — and that the UK is still a trusted partner for a trade deal with the US.
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said he trusted Johnson’s team and was looking forward to a successful trade agreement.
Former US vice president Joe Biden, the Democratic presidential nominee, warned that any trade deal must be “contingent” on respect for the 1998 peace accord that largely ended three decades of sectarian violence in Northern Ireland.
That raised alarms in London and prompted anger among some of Johnson’s Conservatives, some telling the Democrat not to “lecture” Britain.
NOT PREPARED
The truth is that a leak of the proposals contained in the bill forced the government to set out its plans publicly before it was ready, a British official said.
There was no chance to prepare the ground with the EU and explain the thinking before the starkest parts of the new law became public, the person said.
Mistake or not, the EU has demanded that Britain scrap the law by the end of the month, which Johnson will not do.
According to notes summarizing a meeting, Barnier told ambassadors from the 27 EU member states last week that the issue was a grave threat to the chances of a future trade deal.
“It will be difficult to agree on a new agreement when the previous one has not been respected,” Barnier is quoted as saying.
In London, Johnson faced another battle, this time with his own party.
Tory rebels aghast at the government’s plan to break international law were lining up to rewrite the bill.
A Cabinet minister was hinting he could quit if the prime minister pushed ahead.
All day long on Wednesday, Johnson’s team held talks with the rebels, chiefly former British deputy prime minister Damian Green.
Eventually, Downing Street officials cut a deal — to give the House of Commons a veto before ministers could in future break the terms of the Brexit deal.
There was a risk, though, that the compromise could anger the staunchly pro-Brexit wing of the party, and only when it was also signed up to the plan did Johnson’s office go ahead and announce it.
In Johnson’s team, there is still hope that a trade agreement will be reached with the EU before the Brexit transition period expires at the end of the year, even if the bloc does take the UK to court.
The two biggest issues that negotiators are haggling over — fishing and subsidy rules for businesses — can be resolved, one official said.
Britain expects to satisfy the EU with a political commitment not to adopt what Johnson has called “communist” policies of propping up failing companies at any price.
NO MORE TIME
The prime minister himself is also likely to need to intervene to rescue the talks in the weeks ahead, though Johnson’s team think it is still too early for such a gambit.
Yet time is running out. There is only one last round of formal negotiations due to take place, starting on Monday next week.
If there is no agreement by Oct. 15, the UK says it will be time to move on.
And the risk is that a political promise — even in Johnson’s own name — might not go far enough for a legally minded institution such as the EU.
In Barnier, Johnson is dealing with a technocrat rather than an elected politician. Charm may not work.
In any case, even the British side accepts that the EU’s willingness to trust the UK’s word may now not be what it was.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath