The Ministry of Education’s inclusion of a book depicting homosexuality in its recommended reading list for first-graders sparked a backlash from groups opposed to same-sex marriage, which came as no surprise.
The book in question is the Dutch King & King (國王與國王), which was the world’s first children’s book to show a drawing of two men kissing — albeit with a red heart covering their lips — when it was published in 2000.
While the book has sparked debate over the past week in Taiwan, many in the US have been trying to have it banned in schools for the past two decades. It also ranks 20th among the American Library Association’s most challenged books from 2000 to 2009.
One high-profile case was a 2006 federal lawsuit filed by parents in Massachusetts, where same-sex marriage was legalized in 2004. The judge dismissed the lawsuit, saying: “Diversity is a hallmark of our nation.”
“There is no evidence of systemic indoctrination. There is no allegation that [the student] was asked to affirm gay marriage,” the judge said.
Even as Taiwan becomes increasingly diverse on many fronts, discrimination remains rife and the only way to overcome this is by educating the next generation. However, many people still believe that shielding children from the world is the right thing to do.
It is absurd that people still believe that learning about and understanding homosexuality could make a child gay. Still, it seems like the only tired argument that anti-LGBTQ groups can think of to plead their case.
Not only do they allege that the book’s selection is a “plot by the ministry to make children gay,” they also maintain that if the practice continues, Taiwan would become a “homosexualized country,” whatever that means.
The arguments are effective in playing to the fears of many parents, but unless the groups come up with something new, they will be stuck talking to a niche crowd.
However, that does not mean that their comments are not hurtful toward the LGBTQ community and a human rights violation.
As sexual diversity becomes more visible and mainstream in Taiwan following the legalization of same-sex marriage, the banning of books will not shield children from reality.
Given the history of King & King, the ministry’s selection of the title is a bold move and congratulations are in order for the officials who chose it instead of taking the safe route.
“The essence of love is understanding. It is not something you can control or force,” the ministry said regarding the controversy, sending the right message.
Also encouraging is the number of groups who have defended the book. Groups advocating LGBTQ rights and gender equality, as well as parents’ groups, held a news conference on Wednesday last week defending the selection and chanting: “Only understanding can replace discrimination.”
Yesterday, the Taiwan Obasan Political Equality Party, comprised mostly of mothers, also held a rally in support of the book alongside a number of human rights and child welfare groups.
The opposing groups’ efforts to ban the book has ironically led to more public awareness and discussion about the issue.
While the stance of anti-LGBTQ groups is no surprise, it is upsetting that some have even tried to ban the book Butterfly Duo Duo (蝴蝶朵朵), which teaches children to remain vigilant about sexual assault by people they know and to inform people they trust.
This is an important topic and children need all the resources they can access to protect themselves. If sexual assault can happen to children, they are not too young to learn about it.
During the US-India Strategic Partnership Forum’s third leadership summit on Aug. 31, US Deputy Secretary of State Stephen Biegun said that the US wants to partner with the other members of the Quadrilaterial Security Dialogue — Australia, India and Japan — to establish an organization similar to NATO, to “respond to ... any potential challenge from China.” He said that the US’ purpose is to work with these nations and other countries in the Indo-Pacific region to “create a critical mass around the shared values and interest of those parties,” and possibly attract more countries to establish an alliance comparable to
On August 24, 2020, the US Secretary of Defense, Mark Esper, made an important statement: “The Pentagon is Prepared for China.” Going forward, how might the Department of Defense team up with Taiwan to make itself even more prepared? No American wants to deter the next war by a paper-thin margin, and no one appreciates the value of strategic overmatch more than the war planners at the Pentagon. When the stakes are this high, you can bet they want to be super ready. In recent months, we have witnessed a veritable flood of high-level statements from US government leaders on
Over the past year, the world has observed what many of us in the US Congress have warned about for years: The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is an unreliable partner intent on chasing its ambitions to be the world’s superpower at the expense of its people, its partners and the international community at large. In December last year, the CCP had evidence that a new strain of the coronavirus was infecting and killing Chinese citizens at an alarming rate. Their response was to censor medical professionals and lie to their own people out of fear of tarnishing China’s global image, and
China has long sought shortcuts to developing semiconductor technologies and local supply chains by poaching engineers and experts from Taiwan and other nations. It is also suspected of stealing trade secrets from Taiwanese and US firms to fulfill its ambition of becoming a major player in the global semiconductor industry in the next decade. However, it takes more than just money and talent to build a semiconductor supply chain like the one which Taiwan and the US started to cultivate more than 30 years ago. Amid rising trade and technology tensions between the world’s two biggest economies, Beijing has become