President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has taken the bull by the horns and is to allow imports of US pork products containing traces of ractopamine. This decision has important ramifications for Taiwan’s international status and future direction.
The controversy over the new policy reflects the practical dictates of international and domestic politics that have defined Taiwan’s fraught and distorted status over the past three decades due to China’s sustained intimidation of Taiwan, as well as its hysterical suppression of the nation on the international stage.
On the geopolitical level, since coming to power, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has taken a wrecking ball to former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping’s (鄧小平) policies of economic reforms and opening up, as well as to the “collective leadership” model of power succession within the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), in favor of a return to the dictator-for-life model preferred by Mao Zedong (毛澤東).
Xi has jettisoned Deng’s foreign relations principle of “concealing one’s strengths and biding one’s time,” and instead pursues Mao’s nationalistic hegemonic expansionism. China has not only taken to strutting around like a neighborhood bully in the Taiwan Strait, and the East and South China seas, it has also resorted to stealing US secrets, high-tech research findings, and economic, political and military intelligence.
It is no wonder the US has woken up to this unscrupulous behavior and openly abandoned the approach of former US president Richard Nixon.
In terms of international trade, US-China trade relations in the changing geopolitical climate have declined well beyond simple tensions over trade deficits. As US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has said, the threat coming from the CCP does not only affect the US economy, freedom and values, it has gotten to the stage where it threatens freedom and democracy throughout the world.
While US President Donald Trump announced his intention to decouple the economies of the US and China, Taiwan is simultaneously attempting to divest itself of overreliance on China. The two nations appear to be entering a crucial period of a new international trade system.
The restrictions on US beef and pork imports has been an obstacle to Taiwan-US trade. If they are not removed, Taiwan would find it very difficult to break away from reliance on China.
Taiwan-US-China relations are also evolving.
Xi’s dismantling of the “one country, two systems” model in Hong Kong, the attempt to cover up the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic and China’s irregular military activity throughout the Asia-Pacific region, have fundamentally altered the US’ appraisal of its positions toward Taiwan and China.
Taiwan is thus not only linked to the US in terms of trade, politics and democratic freedoms, it also has the opportunity to become a part of the global alliance of free, democratic countries.
Taiwan is clearly crucial to this three-way relationship. Taiwan is one of the pillars of US national interest, not a pawn to be used in furthering it.
The small step of allowing US beef and pork imports to Taiwan might not only lead to talks for a bilateral trade agreement with the US, it might also lead to other bilateral, multilateral and regional trade negotiations with Japan, the EU and the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership.
In terms of Taiwan’s national interests, Tsai’s decision is a major step forward.
Chen Tsai-neng is a doctoral student at National Chung Hsing University’s Graduate Institute of International Politics.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath