When welcoming Czech Senate President Milos Vystrcil to National Chengchi University (NCCU) on Monday last week, university president Kuo Ming-cheng’s (郭明政) controversial remarks not only hurt Aborigines, but also trampled on the dignity of Taiwanese identity.
A similar incident occurred earlier when radio host Luo Hsiao-yun (羅小雲), then chairwoman of the Golden Bell Awards’ panel of judges, loudly made “hoh, hoh, hoh, hoh” sounds when announcing that Alian Radio (原住民族廣播電台) was nominated for an award, and actually asked Aborigines in the audience: “Shouldn’t you be making this sound?”
It was the kind of “joke” that leaves people speechless.
Kuo said that “400 years ago, Taiwan was a primitive society where people did not have sufficient clothes to cover their bodies,” implying that prehistoric Aboriginal cultures, such as the Austronesian culture, were ignorant and backward.
This expression of Han (漢) superiority is even more harmful to Aborigines.
I am not an Aborigine, but I find it unacceptable that at a time when Vystrcil said “I am Taiwanese” in Mandarin during his speech at the Legislative Yuan, Kuo kept bragging about the feudal ideas of Chinese philosophers Confucius (孔子) and Mencius (孟子), adding that NCCU sees itself as the heir to the Chinese culture, highlighting the arrogance of Greater China chauvinism.
Taiwan has always been home to a culturally diverse society, and the Aborigines were the original masters of this land. Chinese culture is thus only part of Taiwanese culture, because throughout history, Taiwan has also undergone Western and Japanese colonial rule and other cultural exchanges.
By promoting the supremacy of Chinese culture, Kuo’s ideology is not much different from the past Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government’s Mandarin-only campaign, which imposed a cultural hegemony banned people from speaking local languages. Why is NCCU still haunted by the KMT’s spirit?
Ironically, while Vystrcil talked about democracy, freedom and Taiwan’s identity, the NCCU president lauded feudal thinking and Chinese hegemony.
Lai Yen-cheng is a graduate student at National Chiao Tung University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Elbridge Colby, America’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, is the most influential voice on defense strategy in the Second Trump Administration. For insight into his thinking, one could do no better than read his thoughts on the defense of Taiwan which he gathered in a book he wrote in 2021. The Strategy of Denial, is his contemplation of China’s rising hegemony in Asia and on how to deter China from invading Taiwan. Allowing China to absorb Taiwan, he wrote, would open the entire Indo-Pacific region to Chinese preeminence and result in a power transition that would place America’s prosperity
When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) first suggested a mass recall of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, the Taipei Times called the idea “not only absurd, but also deeply undemocratic” (“Lai’s speech and legislative chaos,” Jan. 6, page 8). In a subsequent editorial (“Recall chaos plays into KMT hands,” Jan. 9, page 8), the paper wrote that his suggestion was not a solution, and that if it failed, it would exacerbate the enmity between the parties and lead to a cascade of revenge recalls. The danger came from having the DPP orchestrate a mass recall. As it transpired,
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it. The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at
RSS