On Wednesday last week, the Voice of America’s Cantonese service broadcast a commentary titled “Neither renouncing the use of force against Taiwan, nor firing the first shot — what is China trying to do?”
A transcription of the broadcast was also published on the Cantonese Voice of America Web site.
The commentary was written in response to an editorial published on Aug. 17 in the Chinese-language edition of China’s Global Times under the heading “All sides involved in the Taiwan Strait should firmly adhere to the principle of not firing the first shot.”
The Global Times editorial highlighted the contradictory nature of China’s “muscle flexing” against its call for “not firing the first shot.”
None of the three main countries — Taiwan, the US and China — would want to fire the first shot, but does that mean that Taiwan would not turn into a battlefield? Unfortunately, it does not, because the first shot might be fired by Dubinin.
Who is this Dubinin, you might ask. He is a fictional character in a movie, the 2002 film The Sum of All Fears, distributed by Paramount Pictures and based on Tom Clancy’s novel of the same name.
In the movie, after the US city of Baltimore is hit by a nuclear bomb, Russian general Dubinin, falsely claiming that Moscow is under attack by intercontinental ballistic missiles, orders the first shot to be fired by sending warplanes to attack a US aircraft carrier, thus escalating the conflict between the US and Russia, in the hope of sparking a nuclear conflict between the two countries for his own nefarious purposes.
The plot of the movie begs the question of whether someone like Dubinin could appear in the context of the Taiwan Strait.
Various conflicts on a greater or lesser scale are likely to occur between Taiwan, the US and China in the foreseeable future, and when they do, they could give the likes of Dubinin the opportunity to act out their dastardly plans.
In such a scenario, a single missile or torpedo could cause the three countries to attack one another, sinking them into a sea of fire, while the Dubinins of the story watch from a safe distance.
Military exercises are an essential part of a country’s national defense, but would the leaders of any country wish to see a situation where someone like Dubinin gets the chance to provoke a military conflict with their rivals?
This, perhaps, is the most worrying thing about the current situation in East Asia, which is more unstable and uncertain now than it has been at any time this century.
Shih Ya-hsuan is an associate professor in National Kaohsiung Normal University’s Department of Geography.
Translated by Julian Clegg
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
RSS