On Wednesday last week, the Voice of America’s Cantonese service broadcast a commentary titled “Neither renouncing the use of force against Taiwan, nor firing the first shot — what is China trying to do?”
A transcription of the broadcast was also published on the Cantonese Voice of America Web site.
The commentary was written in response to an editorial published on Aug. 17 in the Chinese-language edition of China’s Global Times under the heading “All sides involved in the Taiwan Strait should firmly adhere to the principle of not firing the first shot.”
The Global Times editorial highlighted the contradictory nature of China’s “muscle flexing” against its call for “not firing the first shot.”
None of the three main countries — Taiwan, the US and China — would want to fire the first shot, but does that mean that Taiwan would not turn into a battlefield? Unfortunately, it does not, because the first shot might be fired by Dubinin.
Who is this Dubinin, you might ask. He is a fictional character in a movie, the 2002 film The Sum of All Fears, distributed by Paramount Pictures and based on Tom Clancy’s novel of the same name.
In the movie, after the US city of Baltimore is hit by a nuclear bomb, Russian general Dubinin, falsely claiming that Moscow is under attack by intercontinental ballistic missiles, orders the first shot to be fired by sending warplanes to attack a US aircraft carrier, thus escalating the conflict between the US and Russia, in the hope of sparking a nuclear conflict between the two countries for his own nefarious purposes.
The plot of the movie begs the question of whether someone like Dubinin could appear in the context of the Taiwan Strait.
Various conflicts on a greater or lesser scale are likely to occur between Taiwan, the US and China in the foreseeable future, and when they do, they could give the likes of Dubinin the opportunity to act out their dastardly plans.
In such a scenario, a single missile or torpedo could cause the three countries to attack one another, sinking them into a sea of fire, while the Dubinins of the story watch from a safe distance.
Military exercises are an essential part of a country’s national defense, but would the leaders of any country wish to see a situation where someone like Dubinin gets the chance to provoke a military conflict with their rivals?
This, perhaps, is the most worrying thing about the current situation in East Asia, which is more unstable and uncertain now than it has been at any time this century.
Shih Ya-hsuan is an associate professor in National Kaohsiung Normal University’s Department of Geography.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS