Six people from several political parties are being investigated as part of a major corruption probe by the Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office. Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Su Chen-ching (蘇震清) and his office director Yu Hsueh-yang (余學洋) are among those who were detained.
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) accepted when Su’s uncle, Su Jia-chyuan (蘇嘉全), offered to resign as Presidential Office secretary-general.
Su Jia-chyuan said that he was resigning because of the many occasions on which others had sought to tarnish his name, together with the involvement of a family member in a corruption scandal, which were unwanted distractions for the president.
However, the situation is more complicated than that.
The Su family is important to the DPP because of its deep connections with business and the Pingtung community. For example, these connections enabled the Su family to wrest control of the Pingtung Irrigation Association from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
Su Chen-ching’s uncle has been his benefactor throughout his political career.
Su Chen-ching stood in this year’s legislative election, when the number of Pingtung seats was reduced from three to two and while he was accused of buying shares under somebody else’s name in the Cheng Mei Materials Technology Corp (誠美材料) scandal. This made him ineligible for the DPP’s legislator-at-large list, so he informed the party that he might run as an independent.
Su Jia-chyuan’s wife, Hung Heng-chu (洪恒珠), threatened to challenge the seat as an independent unless the party allowed Su Chen-ching to run — the party acquiesced.
The Su family in Pingtung has become its own party faction.
Local factions and political families monopolize local political resources and seek to influence the central party, while representatives of these factions and families in the central party leadership divert the party’s political and economic resources to their hometowns.
It is corrosive for democracy if any political post is held for a long time by an individual or a family. This is especially true if the family has been involved in numerous scandals. Su Chen-ching is not only implicated in the Pacific Sogo Department Store corruption case, he has the dubious honor of being the legislator accused of receiving the most money.
His family relationship with Su Jia-chyuan establishes a link between him and Tsai. Tsai has had a history of close cooperation with Su Jia-chyuan, who was made party secretary-general the year after Tsai accepted the party chairmanship in 2008.
Even though Su Jia-chyuan lost narrowly to former Taichung mayor Jason Hu (胡志強), Tsai immediately reinstated him as secretary-general and included him as a vice-presidential candidate when she ran for the 2012 presidential election.
This was all part of the party reform introduced to pull the DPP out of the hole it had fallen into by 2008. After Tsai became president, she continued to rely heavily on Su Jia-chyuan. Their close connection, coupled with his relationship with his nephew, shows how the scandals of political families can be headaches for central party leadership.
If the DPP wants to stay in power after Tsai’s term ends, it must set up an anti-corruption mechanism. The DPP should know better than most how long it takes for a party to rid itself of being labeled “corrupt.”
Tsai’s calls for moral discipline, but her admonitions are inadequate. It is only through harsh punishment that the party can restrain the influence of rampant political families.
Wei Jia-yu is a postgraduate student who holds a master’s degree in international relations from Nanyang Technological University in Singapore.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime