When Polish President Andrzej Duda goes up against his liberal challenger in a presidential run-off on Sunday, there is more at stake than just the medium-term political trajectory of the country. The vote is set to be one of the closest and most important European elections in the past few years, and the result is likely to resonate well beyond Poland’s borders.
Duda takes on his liberal challenger, Warsaw Mayor Rafal Trzaskowski, in a race that numerous polls suggest is too close to call. The election is watched closely by European leaders wary of Poland’s political trajectory in the past few years and by progressive politicians worldwide seeking lessons about what does or does not work in taking on populists at the ballot box.
If Duda wins, the Law and Justice (PiS) party would be able to continue to rule largely unchecked. The party’s agenda over the past five years has put Poland on a collision course with Brussels and led the country to be downgraded to a “partially consolidated democracy” by non-governmental organization Freedom House.
Illustration: Mountain People
Duda has courted further controversy by making homophobic rhetoric a cornerstone of his re-election campaign, promising to “defend children from LGBT ideology” and comparing the LGBT rights agenda to communism.
On Saturday last week, Duda said that in the following days, he would propose a constitutional amendment to ban adoption by same-sex couples, which he described as “enslavement” of children.
Trzaskowski has promised to be a more tolerant and open face of Poland in Europe. Trzaskowski has also vowed that he would use the presidential veto liberally to stymie much of the PiS’ legislative agenda, unless there were major compromises from Duda’s party.
A few months ago, defeating the incumbent looked impossible. Duda was riding high in polls and set to win easily. However, after the election, originally set to be held in May, was postponed due to COVID-19, the polls steadily narrowed.
In the first round last weekend, featuring 11 candidates, Duda won 43.5 percent of the vote and was forced into the run-off with Trzaskowski, who got 30.5 percent.
Traditional voting divides were much in evidence, with older voters, and residents of small towns and villages, heavily favoring Duda, and Trzaskowski doing better among urban voters. Both are now in a race to pick up the votes of those who backed third candidates.
An aggregation of polls by Warsaw-based political scientist Ben Stanley puts Trzaskowski at 50.3 percent and Duda at 49.7 percent. Just a few thousand votes might be decisive.
There are certain similarities with another re-election campaign currently under way involving a controversial right-wing nationalist president, and they have not gone unnoticed.
US President Donald Trump invited Duda to the White House for what was effectively an endorsement in a surprise intervention just four days before the first-round vote. Then on Wednesday last week, former US president Barack Obama called Trzaskowski, and they discussed “the importance of Polish democracy,” Trzaskowski said.
The race is also being watched carefully closer to home.
In both Hungary and Poland, the twin bastions of illiberal politics in central Europe, opposition candidates have shown that they can win in big cities.
Winning the whole country might be much harder, but would send a signal that Poland is not traveling further down the path of illiberalism that Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban is treading.
Over the past five years, PiS has offered a cocktail of nationalism, historical grievances, right-wing social and cultural policies, and generous direct welfare payments, most notably substantial monthly child support payments. It has proved a winning combination.
“There are two schools of thought about support for PiS, one is that it is about money, and the other is that people are affected by the right-wing Catholic propaganda. Our polls show that both are true, but the ideology really is very powerful,” news Web site Oko.press editor-in-chief Piotr Pacewicz said.
Realizing that economic arguments could be less persuasive during the current downturn, Duda’s campaign has taken a more sinister turn, introducing anti-LGBT rhetoric.
In a notable low point, Polish Legislator Przemysaw Czarnek, a member of Duda’s campaign team, said of LGBT people: “These people are not equal with normal people.”
While it is not clear if the harsh rhetoric has won Duda new voters, it is doubtlessly popular among some conservatives.
Trzaskowski has tried to sidestep the issue during the campaign. However, on Saturday last week, he said that he was also against same-sex adoption.
Trzaskowski has focused on a positive agenda in broad terms, speaking about local development and economic improvements.
In an interview, Trzaskowski conceded that PiS had been better at connecting with voters outside major cities, who felt they had not benefited from years of liberal-run governments prior to 2015. He referenced the PiS election slogan of “Poland in ruins,” which it used in its winning campaign in 2015, messaging reminiscent of Trump’s inauguration promise to end “American carnage.”
“We were laughing at it and saying that everyone can see that Poland has changed and is not in ruins. And people in small towns would say: ‘We are not stupid, we know Poland is not in ruins, but most of those changes you have introduced are not for us. You are patronizing us and saying it is a great miracle, but we are not participants in that,’” Trzaskowski said.
Voting data shows that PiS voters are on average likely to be older, more rural and less educated than PiS opponents. However, the full extent of the political divide is more complicated, and simply putting PiS support down to class issues masks a failure among progressive politicians to inspire people.
“This distinction is too comfortable, because it is always ‘us’ looking at ‘them,’ and it is something between pity and contempt,” said Karolina Wigura, a sociologist who has edited a newly released collection of essays on Polish politics.
“PiS politicians have been much more skilful in appealing to deep emotions than liberal politicians have, and liberals need to learn from that,” Wigura said.
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
RSS