The National Health Insurance Administration (NHIA) on June 9 announced that it had set maximum out-of-pocket copayments for eight common types of medical devices, which would take effect on Aug. 1.
The policy was met with fierce criticism, but less than one week later, the Ministry of Health and Welfare in a June 13 meeting reached three preliminary agreements with parties in the medical community that quelled the opposition.
A minor dispute arose from someone livestreaming the event after a last-minute decision to have a closed-door session, but ministry staff deserve praise for getting a transcript to all participants before dawn the next day.
Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中) directed what turned into a model rational discussion with representatives of the public, a good debut certain to pay dividends.
A review of the transcript and discussion with friends in the medical community showed that the major points fall under two main complaints:
First, while the NHIA has said that the policy’s impact would be limited, because it would only affect about 5 percent of devices, medical professionals said the items are frequently used, so price caps would affect their income.
Second, medical professionals said that price caps might block higher quality, costlier devices from entering the market, and the policy might eventually extend to devices not covered by the National Health Insurance (NHI) system. The policy drew such a strong backlash because it affected their morale.
The meeting’s three agreements — postponing the policy, referencing international pricing for unreasonably priced devices and increasing pricing transparency — represent an adequate response to the controversy and resolve the two main complaints.
The proposal to implement an across-the-board price cap immediately would not remedy the problem of information asymmetry between doctors and patients.
The ministry’s willingness to revise the policy by referencing international pricing, refining the device categories and examining price transparency is likely to make decisions on price zones more objective and flexible.
Postponing the policy would not have a negative effect on the government or private individuals. More time permits the ministry and hospitals to develop a pricing strategy that would satisfy both sides, and allows the public to better understand their treatment rights and obligations.
The meeting probably allayed the fears of most people, including many legislators, who panicked when seeing the limited list of medical devices, thinking that the government planned to set price caps for all copayment devices.
The public should be aware that average household medical expenses are rising.
Medical expenses accounted for 10.37 percent of the average Taiwanese household’s expenditures in 1995, the year that the NHI program was launched, but 15.85 percent in 2018, surpassing for the first time expenditures on food, tobacco and alcohol and coming in second only to housing.
The average medical expenditure per household rose from about NT$72,000 in 1995 to NT$130,000 in 2018, Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics data showed.
Over the past 23 years, medical expenses have increased more than 2 percent per year, exceeding Taiwan’s inflation rate. Medical expenses have shown the greatest growth in scope and number, without any sign of slowing down.
With population aging likely to accelerate, medical expenses are expected to account for nearly 20 percent of household expenditures by 2030, becoming an onerous financial burden, so careful consideration should be given to healthcare services that have a big price range.
Taiwan has managed to achieve impressive NHI coverage by relying on medical services that are cheaper than those in most nations.
Its successful response to the COVID-19 outbreak can also be attributed to the trust that the public has in Taiwanese medical professionals.
The NHI system must make ends meet. The public should cherish its achievements, while joining to protect and maintain it.
There is a long way to go before most people back the policy and before all obstacles to NHI reform are cleared. The public, medical professionals and the government need to keep communication open and see things from the other’s perspective.
The pride of Taiwan’s democracy can be found in the willingness of Taiwanese to build a consensus through negotiation and compromises.
Hong Chi-chang, a physician, is the chairman of the Taiwan Economy and Industry Association.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Elbridge Colby, America’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, is the most influential voice on defense strategy in the Second Trump Administration. For insight into his thinking, one could do no better than read his thoughts on the defense of Taiwan which he gathered in a book he wrote in 2021. The Strategy of Denial, is his contemplation of China’s rising hegemony in Asia and on how to deter China from invading Taiwan. Allowing China to absorb Taiwan, he wrote, would open the entire Indo-Pacific region to Chinese preeminence and result in a power transition that would place America’s prosperity
When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) first suggested a mass recall of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, the Taipei Times called the idea “not only absurd, but also deeply undemocratic” (“Lai’s speech and legislative chaos,” Jan. 6, page 8). In a subsequent editorial (“Recall chaos plays into KMT hands,” Jan. 9, page 8), the paper wrote that his suggestion was not a solution, and that if it failed, it would exacerbate the enmity between the parties and lead to a cascade of revenge recalls. The danger came from having the DPP orchestrate a mass recall. As it transpired,
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it. The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at
RSS