At the height of last year’s protests in Hong Kong, Daniel Wong Kwok-tung (黃國桐) regularly received late-night requests from a mysterious group known as Spark Alliance (星火同盟) to provide legal assistance to demonstrators rounded up in street battles with police.
The 70-year-old was among several lawyers that Spark Alliance would tap to organize a defense, essentially a back-room operation that kept the demonstrations going for months, despite thousands of arrests of young people — many of whom could not afford to make bail.
However, after authorities in December last year shut down the group’s bank account and froze HK$70 million (US$9 million), Wong now receives telephone calls directly from protesters who end up in legal trouble, and cash used for posting bail is running short as donations dry up.
“People are less well-off these months obviously,” Wong said. “Another reason is, sadly, that we all feel hopeless and cloudy for the future. This battle isn’t ending, and the chance of us winning seems less and less.”
After months of quiet in Hong Kong amid the COVID-19 outbreak, clashes between protesters and police last month resumed in the territory’s streets after China’s decision to impose national security legislation that could curb freedoms. Almost 500 people were arrested, adding to the thousands detained last year in sometimes-violent protests for meaningful elections — a demand Beijing has ignored.
Many of the young protesters who hit the streets rely on funds from better-off sympathizers to help pay their legal bills if they are arrested and charged.
Spark Alliance’s legal troubles left the other main recipient of donations — the 612 Humanitarian Relief Fund (612人道支援基金) — as one of the last places demonstrators could turn for financial support, and it, too, is struggling.
“I personally am worried about how long the fund could go on,” said Cyd Ho (何秀蘭), a former legislator and a trustee of the 612 fund who was among 15 prominent pro-democracy supporters arrested in April. “The economic downturn and the US-China trade war is going to threaten a lot of people’s livelihood, hence their ability to support us.”
The latest monthly audited figures posted on the 612 fund’s Facebook page are not pretty. March saw a 39 percent dip in disposable funding to HK$32.2 million, even as the group said that legal cases connected to protests surged 75 percent in the month.
By the end of April that figure fell to HK$23.8 million — roughly one-third of the peak it hit in October last year.
The group said that a plea for help early last month somewhat replenished the fund, bringing in HK$24 million in 20 days.
It is expected to release its next audited statement later in the month after a period in which the territory’s recession has worsened: The unemployment rate climbed for a seventh straight month in April to 5.2 percent, the highest in more than a decade.
“We remember dearly that citizens encouraged us to use the money wisely, and vowed they would donate to us again,” Margaret Ng (吳靄儀), a barrister and one of 612’s trustees, wrote in a column for the Ming Pao on June 1. “Now we all live a hard life, but Hong Kongers still stand together with no regrets. My city should be proud of such adamant guardians.”
Funding pressures might intensify over the coming months as anger builds over the national security legislation, social distancing restrictions are eased and campaigning starts in earnest for the Hong Kong Legislative Council elections in September.
Police moved quickly to disperse demonstrators on May 27, the day lawmakers deliberated on a bill to criminalize disrespect to the national anthem, detaining the most people since the pandemic hit and kept people indoors.
Although some lawyers are providing services pro bono, others are not. In just one week in mid-May, at least 34 protest-related cases were heard at various courts, involving more than 200 defendants, the 612 fund said.
It said that the expense per defendant is estimated at HK$258,000, assuming a 10-day trial at a magistrates’ court.
The organization is encouraging its clients to first apply for the territory’s legal aid so that they can help those not covered, Ho said.
The 612 fund was set up after clashes on June 12 last year over a bill that would allow extraditions to the mainland for the first time. It is helmed by prominent pro-democracy figures, including Ho, Ng and Cardinal Joseph Zen (陳日君), and discloses audited monthly income statements online.
The fund has faced criticism along the way. Some supporters complained about funding decisions, especially one to buy a “sound system” for rallies.
It was denounced as bureaucratic by protesters because of a slow approval process, and also because it demanded details of arrestees, even though it tried to protect the identities of those it aided.
Still, the 612 fund’s accounting procedures have so far helped it avoid the same fate as Spark Alliance. Founded after the 2014 Umbrella movement, Spark Alliance’s methods were hazy, even to those who helped raise lots of money for the group, which earned the trust of frontline protesters because of its work to bail them out from police stations no matter the hour.
Last year, the two funds together accounted for 70 percent of the money raised to support the pro-democracy protests, a Bloomberg calculation in December showed, shortly before authorities moved in on Spark Alliance.
At least five people were arrested and its bank account — in the name of a director of a pest control company — was frozen.
The group’s Telegram channel is still active to take calls for help, but it mostly forwards messages.
In a statement to Bloomberg, Spark Alliance said that it was “under legal advice not to comment on your inquiry due to an ongoing police investigation. Please accept our sincerest apologies.”
Some in the protest movement are giving in other ways.
The Apple Daily, owned by pro-democracy media tycoon Jimmy Lai (黎智英), started a paid subscription in June last year and has donated HK$1.35 million to the 612 fund, the fund’s public record showed.
A representative of Next Digital Group, the Apple Daily’s publisher, declined to verify that number.
Protest backers are also spending consciously at shops classified as part of the “Yellow Economy Circle” — restaurants and retail brands that are sympathetic to the protesters.
Aello, a fruit tea shop in the suburban area of Yuen Long, displays a sign saying that it will donate a day’s net income to the 612 fund.
Some choose to directly fund “parent groups,” a commonly used code name for residents who provide food and shelter to young protesters.
Another round of fundraising by the project “Stand With Hong Kong” asked for US$1.75 million at gofundme.com to pay for newspaper advertisements in the US and the UK and videos in support of the protesters.
The project received US$1.32 million in seven days.
Still, it is unclear how much cash from these efforts goes directly to aid those arrested while battling in the streets.
The national security legislation, which is to be drafted in the coming months, might increase legal bills if protesters end up facing stiffer charges and longer jail sentences.
Bail after arrest ranges from HK$1,000 to more than HK$10,000, depending on the seriousness of the charges, said Wong, who has primarily focused on helping protesters over the past year.
He said that he has not taken any legal fees and spent nearly HK$5 million in April to start a restaurant called Aegis (保護傘) in Taipei, which hires protesters in exile and helps them with studies, accommodation and legal aid.
For Wong, who recently traded in his car for a cheaper model, it is the least he can do to help a younger generation of Hong Kongers facing a much bleaker future as China continues moves to stamp out dissent in the territory.
“I wished my generation had done more in our time, and the kids wouldn’t have to suffer so much,” Wong said. “I don’t have children of my own. I would do as much as I can for the kids, until I fall.”
In September 2013, the armed wing of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) quietly released an internal document entitled, “Coursebook on the Military Geography of the Taiwan Strait.” This sensitive, “military-use-only” coursebook explains why it is strategically vital that China “reunify” (annex) Taiwan. It then methodically analyzes various locations of interest to People’s Liberation Army (PLA) war planners. The coursebook highlights one future battlefield in particular: Fulong Beach, in New Taipei City’s Gongliao District, which it describes as “3,000 meters long, flat, and straight,” and located at “the head of Taiwan.” A black and white picture of Fulong’s sandy coastline occupies the
US President Joe Biden’s first news conference last month offered reassuring and concerning insights regarding his administration’s approach to China. Biden did not mention the contentious meeting in Alaska where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken and US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan confronted China’s top two foreign policy officials. The Americans implicitly affirmed the administration of former US president Donald Trump’s direct pushback against communist China’s repressive domestic governance and aggressive international behavior. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) and Chinese Central Foreign Affairs Commission Director Yang Jiechi (楊潔篪) had explicitly demanded a return to the policies of
Early last month, China’s rubber-stamp legislature, the National People’s Congress (NPC), officially approved the country’s 14th Five-Year Plan. The strategy was supposed to demonstrate that China has a long-term economic vision that would enable it to thrive, despite its geopolitical contest with the US. However, before the ink on the NPC’s stamp could dry, China had already begun sabotaging the plan’s chances of success. The new plan’s centerpiece is the “dual-circulation” strategy, according to which China would aim to foster growth based on domestic demand and technological self-sufficiency. This would not only reduce China’s reliance on external demand; it would also
Interrupting the assimilation of Xinjiang’s Uighur population would result in an unmanageable national security threat to China. Numerous governments and civil society organizations around the world have accused China of massive human rights abuses in Xinjiang, and labeled Beijing’s inhumane and aggressive social re-engineering efforts in the region as “cultural genocide.” Extensive evidence shows that China’s forceful ethnic assimilation policies in Xinjiang are aimed at replacing Uighur ethnic and religious identity with a so-called scientific communist dogma and Han Chinese culture. The total assimilation of Uighurs into the larger “Chinese family” is also Beijing’s official, central purpose of its ethnic policies