With a health crisis expected to drive a surge in mail voting in November, US election officials face a major challenge: Ensure tens of millions of ballots can reach voters in time to be cast, and are returned in time to be counted.
Recent presidential nomination contests and other elections held in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic — a warm-up for the Nov. 3 general election if COVID-19 remains a threat — showed that some states have been overwhelmed by the sudden rush to vote by mail.
Nearly half of US states allow voters to request absentee ballots less than a week before their elections. Even under normal circumstances, that often is too little lead time to guarantee voters would receive their ballots and have sufficient time to return them, election experts and state officials say.
Illustration: Yusha
In Ohio, for example, whose nearly all-mail election on April 28 was marred by ballot delivery delays, Republican Secretary of State Frank LaRose has asked state lawmakers to change the deadline for voters to request a mail ballot to one week before an election, up from three days currently.
“It is not logistically possible” for all voters asking for ballots at the last minute to get them in time to return them by mail, LaRose said.
“That relies on a lot of luck,” he said.
At stake is the integrity of the general election, and possibly its outcome. Voters who follow their state’s rules but cannot get their ballots back in time due to no fault of their own could be effectively disenfranchised.
That could spark legal challenges in states where the race between US President Donald Trump and Democratic rival Joe Biden would be decided by slim margins. Tight contests could also decide control of the US Senate and the House of Representatives.
“Citizens could respond to all this and say our democracy is broken,” said Paul Gronke, a political scientist who expects about half of all ballots to be cast by mail in November, compared to a fifth delivered that way in 2016.
“Election officials need to move now” to make preparations to expeditiously move election mail and to avoid widespread disenfranchisement, said Gronke, who heads the Early Voting Information Center at Reed College in Portland, Oregon.
Some are taking action. Wisconsin’s bipartisan election commission is working on adding new barcodes to ballot envelopes for tracking them in the mail, a move experts say would help the US Postal Service (USPS) process them more quickly.
The commission also plans to mail absentee ballot applications to 2.7 million registered voters who are not already on absentee voter rolls, a move that should help reduce 11th-hour requests.
Michigan’s Democratic secretary of state likewise plans to mail absentee ballot applications to every voter ahead of November’s election, as Republican secretaries of state in Georgia and Iowa did for their June primaries.
Trump has criticized Michigan’s plan, and some Republican state lawmakers called it an unnecessary expense. The president and his allies nationwide have repeatedly said that mail voting is prone to fraud, even as numerous independent studies have found little evidence of that.
Experts are most worried about battleground states that have little history of large-scale voting by mail, including Wisconsin, North Carolina and Pennsylvania.
They are among the 24 states in which mail-in ballots comprised no more than 8 percent of ballots counted in 2018 midterm elections, the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University said.
Failure by these states to prepare could lead to messy legal fights in the event of a close contest in November, said Edward Foley, an election law expert at Ohio State University.
“If you have 10,000 voters that never got their ballots, or their ballots didn’t get returned by the post office and the statewide margin is 3,000, well now you have got litigation over the results,” Foley said.
The postal service has internally set delivery targets for election mail ranging between one and three days, according to an audit of election mail service by the USPS inspector general published in November. In the 2018 elections, about one in 20 political and election mailings took longer than targeted, the audit found.
The USPS said in a statement that it is holding discussions with state and local election officials nationwide on how to design their mailings for efficient processing and delivery.
Some voting rights advocates worry these efforts do not go far enough.
Setting an earlier deadline for requesting a ballot could also make it harder for people to vote if they contract COVID-19 or have other problems just before the election, League of Women Voters of Ohio executive director Jen Miller said.
Miller is advocating that Ohio send ballot applications to all registered voters and set up more drop boxes so that concerned voters can deposit ballots there.
“I think it’s reasonable for an Ohioan to be worried about putting their ballot in the mail,” Miller said.
April elections in Wisconsin and Ohio, which included presidential nomination contests, offered a preview of what could happen if the coronavirus is raging in November and in-person voting is severely restricted.
After Ohio sharply curtailed in-person voting, election officials were inundated with roughly 2 million applications for mail-in ballots — more than six times the number of mail ballots cast in the 2016 primary.
As they scrambled to process the requests, they discovered that some ballots mailed out to voters took as long as nine days to reach them.
What was not known to them at the time was that a COVID-19 outbreak was ravaging a mail sorting facility in neighboring Michigan called the Michigan Metroplex, delaying election mail bound for northwestern Ohio.
At least two workers at the Detroit-area plant died after testing positive for COVID-19, and hundreds of its roughly 700 union workers were out sick or in quarantine on many days between mid-March and mid-April, said Roscoe Woods, who heads the local branch of the American Postal Workers Union.
Letters were shipped to Ohio unsorted, forcing local post offices there to organize mail manually for delivery, Woods said.
“I don’t think anyone was prepared for the level of infection,” Woods said.
The postal service said that it was investigating the matter, but would not confirm a coronavirus outbreak at the Metroplex.
A spokesman for the office of LaRose said the USPS confirmed that the Metroplex was the problem facility.
LaRose said the experience left him with big concerns about November, and he anticipates that as many as 60 percent of Ohio’s ballots would be cast by mail, triple the percentage from 2016.
“I hope we never have to have an all vote-by-mail election again,” he said.
In Wisconsin, an important battleground state that was decided in Trump’s favor by less than a percentage point in 2016, about 1.3 million voters applied for absentee ballots for its April 7 primary, overloading officials accustomed to issuing only a fraction of that number.
In a May 15 report, the Wisconsin Elections Commission said that 2,659 ballots were tossed out because they arrived after April 13, the last day ballots postmarked by election day could be counted.
The commission does not know how many of these were postmarked in time, spokesman Reid Magney said.
The commission said it expects “terrific challenges” in November. It estimates that more than half the state’s 3.4 million registered voters could request mail ballots.
In November 2016, fewer than 150,000 — or about 5 percent of three million votes — ballots were cast by mail.
In North Carolina, another competitive state, the state election board expects 30 to 40 percent of ballots to be cast by mail and is working to implement new barcodes on all ballot envelopes, board spokesman Patrick Gannon said.
Mail ballots that arrive at North Carolina election offices up to three days after the election are counted as long as they are postmarked by election day.
However, Jason Roberts, a Democratic member of the board of elections for Orange County, North Carolina, said that he saw scores of ballots in the state’s March primary that were postmarked in time but arrived four or five days after the election.
“I would be hesitant to vote by mail in North Carolina on election day given what I’ve seen,” Roberts said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath