The government’s updated plan to boost private consumption by issuing stimulus coupons should provide much-needed support to the economy, given that the plan has multiple payment tools, and is larger in scale and has better rewards than the original version. That might dissipate some economists’ concerns that Taiwan might not record positive GDP growth this year, and fail to outperform major Asian economies such as Singapore and South Korea.
In the first quarter of this year, Taiwan outperformed most economies, with annual GDP growth of 1.54 percent, but the question now is how to keep the engine running. Domestic demand contributed 0.68 percentage points, or 44 percent, to last quarter’s GDP, and spurring domestic consumption has become one of the government’s top priorities. The nation’s manufacturing sector has been hurt by the COVID-19 pandemic, as people in Taiwan’s major export markets, such as China, the US and Europe, have delayed purchasing non-essential items amid a global economic downturn.
Large-scale containment measures and lockdowns worldwide have also constrained factory production and commercial activities, hurting demand for electronics, components and petrochemical products made in Taiwan. As a result, the production value of the nation’s manufacturing sector is expected to shrink 5.7 percent annually, the Industrial Technology Research Institute (工研院) said in its latest forecast.
While external demand is beyond the government’s control, domestic consumption and investment can be spurred via fiscal policies. The government is close to finalizing details of stimulus coupons worth NT$40 billion (US$1.33 billion), which is almost four times the original budget of NT$11.1 billion.
As the subsidy aims to boost consumption, the program should be expanded to cover all Republic of China citizens, National Development Council Minister Kung Ming-hsin (龔明鑫) said yesterday during an interview with Hit FM radio host Clara Chou (周玉蔻).
The plan would allow anyone, regardless of age or income, to pay NT$1,000 to obtain vouchers worth NT$3,000, which is a U-turn from the original plan of excluding high-income earners from the scheme.
To maximize the vouchers’ effectiveness, the government is to expand their use to pay for almost everything from snacks at night markets or coffee at convenience stores to travel and entertainment. However, they cannot be used to “hoard” everyday necessities, such as toilet paper, or make purchases online.
People would also be able to make payments not only through digital payment platforms as previously planned, but also by other means.
The government is considering allowing payments via credit cards, Kung said.
In 2008, the government launched a similar, yet less sophisticated scheme by issuing NT$86.5 billion of consumption coupons, or NT$3,600 for each recipient, to combat the fallout from the global financial crisis. That helped boost the nation’s GDP by 0.28 to 0.43 percent the next year, lower than the estimated 0.66 to 1 percent, as most people spent the money on daily necessities, rather than on extra items.
Although the budget for the new plan is less than half the amount of 2008, it might at least offer a lifeline to local retailers, restaurants, hotels and tourism businesses that are on the verge of collapse.
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
RSS