On Feb. 19, two days before the legislative session started, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator-at-large Wu Sz-huai (吳斯懷) submitted a written question to the Executive Yuan for President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), whose interview with the BBC last month Wu said contained a provocative message to China.
Taking questions from reporters in the legislature the next day, Wu quoted a passage from Mencius (孟子), who advised King Xuan (宣王) of the state of Qi that, “it requires a perfectly virtuous prince to be able, with a great country, to serve a small one ... And it requires a wise prince to be able, with a small country, to serve a large one,” implying that Tsai should be more discreet.
Knowing that his statement would draw a backlash, Wu added: “After all, we are the weaker of the two.”
It is lamentable to see Wu look down on the nation’s armed forces, in which he once served as a lieutenant general.
Saying that Taiwan is the weaker nation was an oft-repeated phrase among commentators with a pessimistic, defeatist attitude toward cross-strait relations. It was to remind the public to stay smart and to admonish against taking sides in the competition between China and the US for world hegemony.
Yet is Taiwan really the weaker one? Over the past 70 years, Taiwan has survived China’s threat to “unify the motherland,” proving that Taiwan is by no means weak.
When Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and his son, Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), ruled Taiwan, they did not adopt Mencius’ advice that the prince of a small country should serve a larger neighbor.
Instead, Chiang Ching-kuo took a tough stance by implementing the “three noes” policy — no contact, no negotiation and no compromise — leaving Beijing at its wits’ end.
Taiwan might be small in size and population, but it is not weak. Neither is it small, thanks to its supporters, or Beijing would have launched a war to conquer Taiwan by force without having to push policies to attract young Taiwanese and Taiwanese businesspeople.
Small in size, but never weak in power, Taiwan in 2018 ranked 21st in terms of nominal GDP and 18th in terms of exports worldwide, making it a manufacturing and trade powerhouse.
The difference between strong and weak is not limited to military power. Culture, education, values, economy and politics all constitute a nation’s power.
Taiwan’s democracy and freedom are strong points, as evidenced by the latest edition of Freedom House’s annual Freedom in the World report: Taiwan scored 93 out of 100 and ranked eighth among the world’s freest countries.
This explains why Taiwan has been supported by the free world on many international occasions.
Taiwan also leads in information technology and semiconductors, and neither the US, Japan nor European countries would want to see these industries fall into the hands of totalitarian China. This is yet another reason Taiwan is not weak.
On Feb. 9 and 10, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) conducted a joint-forces exercise simulating sea-air combat and sent warplanes to encircle Taiwan. On the second day of the drill, two PLA Shenyang J-11 jets crossed the Taiwan Strait median line, with one of them even locking on to a Taiwanese F-16 jet that intercepted them.
The US promptly responded by deploying air and marine forces to navigate the waters and airspace around Taiwan in the following days.
The reason for this quick response and demonstration of its determination to safeguard Taiwan is simple: Taiwan plays an important role in the US’ global strategy.
With Washington’s support, surely Taiwan is not weak.
As the military standoff in the first island chain between China and the US becomes more apparent, Taiwan occupies an increasingly vital position in military geography, since defending the first island chain is a matter of war and peace for the US.
The technology war between China and the US is part of their competition for world hegemony. Media reports have said that the US government plans to restrict global chip sales to Huawei; Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co is one of the Chinese company’s largest suppliers. The US would need Taiwan to cooperate with the sanctions.
If the US is asking for Taiwanese collaboration, surely Taiwan is not weak.
It is time that Wu wakes up. If the two Chiangs were still alive, they would shout and tell him to “remain calm, self-reliant and dignified in times of adversity,” like a soldier.
Wu, now an elected representative of the public, should not belittle Taiwan. Taiwan should refrain from provoking China, but it should not bow down and kneel.
Huang Tien-lin is a former advisory member of the National Security Council and a national policy adviser to the president.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
RSS