In Europe, if you go to a public hospital seeking medical advice, you expect accurate, science-based information. You expect the staff attending you to be professionally trained and certified. You would have similar expectations on university campuses, in schools, women’s shelters or other state-run facilities, right?
Think again. In a new report, the global news site openDemocracy reveals how women and girls are being given “misinformation and manipulation” on an extraordinary scale in “crisis pregnancy centers” (CPCs) around the world.
Supported by powerful US activists with close ties to US President Donald Trump’s administration, and often made to look like health clinics, many of these centers claim to offer pregnant women unbiased “advice.”
Illustration: Yusha
In fact, staff aim to dissuade women from having legal abortions and, in some cases, from accessing contraception.
In the first investigation of its kind, openDemocracy mapped the global spending, networks and activities of two influential anti-abortion groups based in the US, Heartbeat International and Human Life International.
Together, they have spent US$13 million around the world since 2007 and have funded and trained hundreds of organizations globally.
We sent undercover reporters, posing as vulnerable pregnant women, into Heartbeat-affiliated CPCs in 18 countries around the world, where they consistently received wildly misleading and false information.
Abortion can increase cancer risks. A woman needs consent from a partner to have one. Hospitals will not treat medical complications. Women will suffer from a widely debunked “post-abortion syndrome.”
We also sent a reporter to get Heartbeat training, available online or in-person globally. Our reporter was taught to encourage women to delay abortion and emergency contraception.
In these trainings, they also claim that condoms are not effective at preventing pregnancy, and to tell women that abortion increases risk of abuse of other children and could “turn” partners gay.
In the US, there are thousands of CPCs. In the wake of the US Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe v Wade decision legalizing abortion nationwide, Heartbeat was one of a number of groups that expanded a model that began in response to liberalization of state abortion laws in the 1960s.
Their CPCs have been repeatedly challenged in the US for presenting themselves as neutral health facilities, while hiding their anti-abortion and religious agendas from women seeking help.
However, until now, the global scale of these activities had not been mapped.
The power and influence of US religious conservatives in Latin America and Africa is well known. As a result of the draconian anti-abortion restrictions they have backed, women have been jailed for having miscarriages and thousands die from unsafe abortions every year.
In Uganda, our reporter was told she could never “truly” love and care for any children after an abortion, and might have difficulty conceiving again.
In Argentina, a reporter who said she was in an abusive relationship was told: “Now, you’re a victim, but an abortion would make you part of that violence since you will be violent.”
The scale of these operations in Europe has shocked lawmakers, doctors and health experts. We found more than 400 Heartbeat-affiliated CPCs in Italy alone — and dozens more across Spain, Croatia, Serbia, Romania and Ukraine.
At a CPC inside a Lombardy hospital, our reporter was told that having a baby can cure leukemia.
In Spain, our reporter was given books and articles claiming that abortion causes mental health problems, sterility and heart attacks.
She was also warned that women who have an abortion are “144 percent more likely” to abuse their children.
The organizations that run these centers have both received Heartbeat funding and participated in in-person training. They also receive public funds and political endorsements: in Italy, from far-right former-deputy prime Minister Matteo Salvini; in Spain, from the far-right Vox party.
Neil Datta, secretary of the European Parliamentary Forum for Sexual and Reproductive Rights, finds it highly “disturbing” that foreign groups are “proactively attempting to deprive women of their legal rights … by deliberately deceiving them.”
He calls it “a rule of law issue.”
No policymaker, whatever their position on abortion, should stand by while “their country’s laws are being circumvented through disinformation, emotional manipulation and outright deceit specifically targeting pregnant women,” he said.
What can be done? It is instructive that openDemocracy’s reporters were not fed such extreme falsehoods when they visited CPCs in North America.
In the US, Heartbeat has a “Commitment of Care” which promises that women will always receive “accurate information,” including on abortion and contraception, and to advertising and communication that are “truthful and honest and accurately describe the services we offer.”
While many of Heartbeat’s global affiliates clearly do not follow these rules, it appears that legal pressure and greater scrutiny in the US have had some effect — despite the US’ robust free-speech protections.
That means there is surely room for more ambitious action in the EU. It cannot be right that most EU countries require a license to sell vitamins, but not to offer a pregnant woman an ultrasound.
All of the countries we investigated have laws or regulations prohibiting false or deceptive advertising of goods or services, yet we found no evidence of legal challenges against CPCs under these rules outside of the US.
There are obvious steps to be taken in countries like Italy, where national and regional lawmakers must urgently ban CPCs from public hospitals and — critically — improve provision of accurate, science-based advice, education and healthcare services for women and girls.
The catastrophic lack of such services in Italy has created a vacuum, which religious conservatives have deftly filled.
Notably, many of the clients our reporters saw at Italian CPCs were Roma and migrant women; similarly, in Spain, we observed Latin American migrants in financial difficulty.
Other countries have made some efforts. In 2017, France made it a crime to provide women with false information about abortion, although no cases have yet been brought under this law, and rights groups question its effectiveness.
The same year, Ireland tabled proposals for a new law to regulate counselors, after journalists found staff at a CPC telling women that abortion causes cancer, among other falsehoods.
However, these legislative proposals have now stalled.
There is, rightly, much discussion in Brussels and across European capitals about how to combat fake news online and rein in the power of Big Tech, but the toxic spread of misinformation offline is arguably even more insidious and influential.
Are you more likely to believe something you are told in a hospital or by a trusted member of your community, or an ad on Facebook?
What openDemocracy’s investigation found is likely just the tip of the iceberg.
Heartbeat and Human Life International are part of a larger universe of anti-abortion evangelists targeting vulnerable women and girls globally.
We have found evidence pointing to hundreds more CPCs in other countries, from the Czech Republic to Kenya. The model is cheap — often relying on well-meaning volunteers — and easy to replicate. It is misinformation on a global scale.
Europe must lead the way in putting a stop to it.
Mary Fitzgerald is editor-in-chief of openDemocracy, an independent global media platform covering world affairs, ideas and culture.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Within Taiwan’s education system exists a long-standing and deep-rooted culture of falsification. In the past month, a large number of “ghost signatures” — signatures using the names of deceased people — appeared on recall petitions submitted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) against Democratic Progressive Party legislators Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) and Wu Pei-yi (吳沛憶). An investigation revealed a high degree of overlap between the deceased signatories and the KMT’s membership roster. It also showed that documents had been forged. However, that culture of cheating and fabrication did not just appear out of thin air — it is linked to the
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
Taiwan People’s Party Legislator-at-large Liu Shu-pin (劉書彬) asked Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) a question on Tuesday last week about President William Lai’s (賴清德) decision in March to officially define the People’s Republic of China (PRC), as governed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as a foreign hostile force. Liu objected to Lai’s decision on two grounds. First, procedurally, suggesting that Lai did not have the right to unilaterally make that decision, and that Cho should have consulted with the Executive Yuan before he endorsed it. Second, Liu objected over national security concerns, saying that the CCP and Chinese President Xi
China’s partnership with Pakistan has long served as a key instrument in Beijing’s efforts to unsettle India. While official narratives frame the two nations’ alliance as one of economic cooperation and regional stability, the underlying strategy suggests a deliberate attempt to check India’s rise through military, economic and diplomatic maneuvering. China’s growing influence in Pakistan is deeply intertwined with its own global ambitions. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a flagship project of the Belt and Road Initiative, offers China direct access to the Arabian Sea, bypassing potentially vulnerable trade routes. For Pakistan, these investments provide critical infrastructure, yet they also
RSS