At Karet Bivak Cemetery in Jakarta, the neat rows of headstones extend as far as the eye can see, seeming to sprout into skyscrapers at the horizon.
Driving his scooter through after Friday prayers, a friendly Muslim man wearing white robes and a taqiyah cap seems at peace with his fate.
“This is my future home,” he says, leaning on the handlebars and indicating the graves. “Your home, my home — everybody’s home.”
Illustration: Mountain People
That is no longer the case. Spread over 16 hectares of a former rubber plantation, Karet Bivak is Jakarta’s second-largest cemetery — and, like an increasing number across the city, it is full. Authorities froze new plots in November 2017 to prevent overcrowding. For now and the foreseeable future, the only way to be buried here is for your body to be stacked on top of another one.
Up to six people, typically from the same family, are being buried in a space originally designated for one. There are now about 100,000 bodies in 48,400 plots.
It is a stopgap solution to a shortage of burial land in a city where overcrowding above ground is increasingly extending below it. Of 84 public cemeteries, a quarter have stopped licensing new plots, limiting burials to those with written permission to join an existing one.
Meanwhile, the number of cemeteries stacking bodies, known as makam tumpeng — “overlapping graves” — was reported as 16 in August, and is now confirmed at 20.
Bodies can be stacked alongside or on top of each other, according to the municipal policy, with a minimum of 1m between them. Plots must also be at least three years old before another body can be added, by which point only a skeleton remains.
The head of Karet Bivak, Saiman — who, like many Indonesians, goes by one name — says that stacking is no issue for the dead: Problems only arise among the living.
There have been graveside conflicts when one of the bereaved has realized too late that the deceased is joining an occupied plot, he says.
Family rifts have also been weaponized by the requirement for written permission from the license holder.
One woman refused to allow her late ex-husband use of the family plot because he had remarried, Jakarta Forestry Agency funeral service unit Ricky Putra says.
In another case, a man wanted to be buried on top of his uncle, but his cousin blocked him due to jealousy.
As the overcrowding issue emerged about three years ago, the department has worked hard to educate the public about its stacking solution, Putra says.
As well as articles in the press and social media, Karet Bivak hung banners in the lead-up to Ramadan — the busiest time of year for Muslim cemeteries, when thousands make a pilgrimage to loved ones’ graves.
Jakarta’s high population density means that most public cemeteries are boxed in by buildings, with regulations further preventing their expansion. In south Jakarta, the Kalibata Heroes Cemetery is converting its gardens into graves, to expand its capacity by 900.
“It is very hard to get land for a cemetery, or even development of infrastructure,” says Rangi Faridha, an architect on the city planning and development board. “There are many factors, but the biggest one is that people don’t want to sell their land.”
Long before they started stacking, cemeteries also dug up “expired” graves, ones where licenses had been allowed to lapse. About 20,000 plots at Karet Bivak were freed up in this way — but as with stacking, this policy can only do so much to meet demand.
The growing number of public cemeteries reaching capacity is a concern, but not a crisis, says Putra in his office, the files behind him piled almost to the ceiling as if to undermine his claims.
The city still has 200 hectares of land in reserve for cemeteries, he says, pulling up pictures on his smartphone of a 20-hectare area under development in north Jakarta — a stretch of swampland that is slated to open in 2021.
However, with 80 to 100 bodies being received at public cemeteries every day, the issue continues to be pressing, particularly for poorer Jakartans.
Five of the 20 full cemeteries are in east Jakarta, where the city’s poverty rate is highest. Public cemeteries typically charge about 100,000 Indonesian rupiah (US$7.12) for burial in a new plot, and then a smaller license fee every three years — for perspective, the poverty line is set at 400,000 rupiah per month.
Most poorer people seek to send their dead to the one closest to their home, in the interests of convenient visits and lowering costs — but if your closest public cemetery is full, you must incur the extra costs yourself of traveling further afield. Even ambulances charge a fee.
Private cemeteries are popping up for those who can afford them, including “luxury parks” such as San Diego Hills in Karawang, West Java, where a burial — including coffin, embalming, certification and license — can cost more than 26 million rupiah, Saiman says.
At Karet Bivak, it costs between 10,000 and 25,000 rupiah to license a plot for three years, but for extra care, there are hundreds of informal caretakers — often below the poverty line themselves — who make their living providing grave maintenance as “freelancers,” and in many cases live in the cemetery itself, Saiman says.
In east Jakarta, the predominantly Chinese Kebon Nanas Cemetery is home to as many as 200 people.
With its active service economy — signposted subdivisions as well as food carts and stalls at each gate — the cemetery is like a central neighborhood. For many residents, it is also their most accessible open green space.
Jakarta has less than 5 percent green space, forcing people in search of respite from the pace and pollution of the city into cemeteries. Last year, a party in an east Jakarta graveyard, complete with sound system and marquees, prompted a rebuke from the city administration.
Building more cemeteries could be a huge opportunity for the city, says Mohamad Reza Mohamed Afla, a senior lecturer at Universiti Sains Malaysia in Penang who specializes in burial land management.
Cities across Southeast Asia are facing the same issue of overcrowding — in Singapore, stacking has been mandated for many years, while Kuala Lumpur is considering it — but he says that Jakarta is at an advantage in that many of its public cemeteries are centrally located, and residents and authorities recognize their value as public space.
“In Jakarta, the local people live close to them, so they really have a social value,” he says. “People just hang out there — in Kuala Lumpur, we don’t do that.”
Cemeteries also create jobs and help reduce the impact of heat, he says, adding that a truly livable city is one that ensures its residents’ well-being into the afterlife.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval