Global bottled water giants are ramping up trials of easily recyclable aluminum cans to replace plastic that pollutes the world’s seas. Sound like a slam-dunk for the environment? Not entirely.
Aluminum cans might indeed mean less ocean waste, but they come with their own eco-price: the production of each can pumps about twice as much carbon into the atmosphere as each plastic bottle.
French group Danone has become the latest company to make a move, telling Reuters it had started to replace some plastic bottles with aluminum cans for local water brands in the UK, Poland and Denmark.
Illustration: Mountain People
The shift, previously unannounced, comes as multinational rivals like Coca-Cola Co, PepsiCo and Nestle are also launching some canned versions of water brands.
The beverage industry has been scrambling to react to public anger over scenes of huge piles of plastic waste contaminating oceans, pledging to step up recycling efforts.
However it is not black and white on the green front. By increasing recycling via cans, companies could fall back in efforts to reduce their carbon footprints, illustrating the tough juggling act they can face to keep environmentally conscious investors, campaigners and consumers on-side.
“That’s the dilemma you’re going to have to choose between,” said Ruben Griffioen, sustainability manager of packaging materials at Heineken, adding that the company was trying to reduce both plastic waste and emissions.
Recycling plastic is more complex, leads to degradation and has lower reuse rates than aluminum — so the metal has been heralded as a greener alternative. Cans have on average 68 percent recycled content compared with just 3 percent for plastic in the US, US Environmental Protection Agency data showed.
New water brands are also making a splash.
“Mananalu will rid the world of plastic water containers and start a wave of change,” says the Web site of the new canned water launched by Hollywood actor Jason Momoa, of Aquaman fame. Another entrant, Liquid Death, meanwhile, hails its “eco-friendly cans” and uses the hashtag DeathtoPlastic.
“The aluminum industry can play on the fact that its product is infinitely recyclable, and they’re right,” said Martin Barrow, director of footprinting at UK-based non-profit consultancy the Carbon Trust. “But primary aluminum uses huge amounts of electricity and it’s also got some chemical releases of greenhouse gas emissions.”
Comparing the carbon footprints of aluminum and plastics is a complex calculation, because making the metal with hydro power instead of fossil fuels reduces emissions, while using recycled aluminum slashes it even further.
However, when all types of metal are averaged out, cans still account for about double the greenhouse gases of plastic bottles, Barrow said, citing figures for Europe.
At aluminum’s most polluting level, a 330ml can is responsible for 1,300g of carbon dioxide emissions, according to the analysis compiled for Reuters, roughly equating to the emissions produced by driving a vehicle 7km to 8km.
A plastic bottle of the same size, made from the polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastic typically used, accounts for up to 330g.
‘NEVER THAT CLEAN’
Bruce Karas, an executive at Coca-Cola North America in change of environment and sustainability, acknowledged the conflicting environmental pressures at play.
“When we look at a different material, you look at all of the levers: the carbon footprint, consumer preference, energy, water,” he said. “There’s a mix, there are some things that are not that desirable, but if you have five good things and one that isn’t, we’ll all have to make decisions. It’ll never be that clean.”
So aluminum has a larger footprint in production because of the vast power needed in the smelting process. However, in a further example of the complexities of environmental impact, the overall carbon equation becomes more muddied when other issues, such as logistics, are taken into account.
“It’s a complex picture, certainly,” said Simon Lowden, an executive who leads Pepsi’s plastics drive. “You have to think about transport, secondary packaging, time in store, all those considerations come into play.”
Because aluminum is lightweight and cans make efficient use of space, less transport is usually needed than for plastics or glass, while less power is also needed to chill drinks in cans — particularly useful in tropical climes.
“That means in some markets aluminum would actually not produce as much greenhouse gas,” Lowden said.
PLASTIC STRIKES BACK
However, while cans could well carve out a niche within the US$19 billion-a-year bottled water industry, they are unlikely to sweep the board anytime soon, if ever, industry experts have said.
Simple economics is a major factor; aluminum is more expensive than plastic — the raw material cost for a can is about 25 to 30 percent higher than a PET bottle of a similar volume, according to analyst Uday Patel at consultancy Wood Mackenzie.
A broad shift to aluminum cans would raise costs for drinks companies, also including new manufacturing infrastructure, some of which are likely to be passed on to consumers, thus hitting products’ competitiveness against plastic rivals.
Another key factor is consumer convenience.
How often do people down bottles of water in one go? While advances are being made in can technology, most cans are opened and stay open, while bottles can be recapped.
Plastic water bottles can also be sold in a range of sizes, while cans are more limited.
As a result of such factors, drinks giants are cautious.
“It’s not necessarily saying we’re pulling the plug on plastic, it’s really looking at how do consumers react to canned water,” Karas said.
In an example of this toe-in-the-water approach, Coke is planning a limited launch of its top US water brand Dasani in aluminum cans and aluminum resealable bottles later this year.
Even while companies are beginning to sell water in cans, to assuage pollution concerns, they are also embarking on a green makeover for plastic. Scientific efforts include creating new compounds that are biodegradable or more easily recyclable.
Danone told Reuters it was replacing some plastic with aluminum cans for its Flyte brand in the UK, Sparkles in Poland and Aqua d’or in Denmark.
However, the company, which uses 400,000 tonnes of PET bottles each year, is also focusing on increasing recycling of plastic and plans to use an average of 50 percent recycled material in its water bottles by 2025 and 100 percent for its Evian brand.
And while Pepsi is testing aluminum for its Aquafina water at food service outlets, it is also introducing a plastic bottle made of 100 percent recycled material for another brand, Lifewtr.
“The consideration for aluminum is much higher on the list than it has been for the last few years, [but] the hardest thing to change is infrastructure,” Lowden said. “Hence our need to drive hard the recyclability of plastic as well as look at our mix of cans and glass.”
CAN SHORTAGES
Another obstacle to a large-scale shift from plastic bottles is that there might not be enough cans to go round, at a time when some beers and wines are also switching from glass to cans.
The world’s top can maker, Ball Corp, which supplies the likes of Coca-Cola and Pepsi, is already scrambling to add capacity to meet demand.
“This is a level of growth that we haven’t seen in a long time. We’re looking at a number of speed-up projects, new can lines,” said Kathleen Pitre, chief commercial and sustainability officer for Ball’s global beverage packaging business.
Ball told investors it planned to add 4 billion to 5 billion additional cans of capacity by the middle of 2021 to its existing 105 billion, but this does not even include potential expansion in the water sector.
A shift of only 1 percent of global soft drinks, beer and bottled water from plastic and glass to cans, would mean a surge of 24 billion more cans, said the company, the third-biggest stock gainer among the S&P 500 index over the past 12 months.
That 1 percent change would increase aluminum demand by about 310,000 tonnes, according to Patel, and further shifts could counter wider market weakness.
Major aluminum producers Alcoa and Norsk Hydro have cut estimates of global demand growth for aluminum, partly due to trade tensions between the US and top metals consumer China.
“You’re talking about billions and billions of water bottles, so there’s a potential revival for the aluminum can market,” Patel said. “But it’ll take three or four years to see if this is a real trend.”
Additional reporting by Polina Ivanova in Moscow
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS