Due to concerns over the violent incidents in Kaohsiung allegedly inspired by Web celebrity Allen Lien (連千毅), the government sent Criminal Investigation Bureau Commissioner Huang Ming-chao (黃明昭) to the city to handle the case, drawing criticism from Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) and his supporters, who said the government was using dirty campaign tricks against him.
Putting aside the issue of whether it was necessary for the central government to step in after Lien caused trouble in Kaohsiung for three days, Internet celebrities and online streamers can incite crowds to gather and cause disturbances.
Using online platforms such as the Facebook group “Baoliao Commune” (爆料公社), they are using selective broadcasts to denounce the central government and, in particular, the police for either not doing enough or handling the matter the wrongly.
By arousing their audience’s discontent, they can incite a mass incident at any time. This is a problem the government must not ignore. As Internet technology continues to develop, the high accessibility and low cost of social media have completely changed the media ecosystem.
Lien has only recently become a well-known figure, but Holger Chen (陳之漢) has long been one of Taiwan’s most influential Web celebrities. Chen’s streaming career, launched in 2014, has grown so fast in five years that he can shake every political party.
Before the nine-in-one elections on Nov. 24 last year, candidates such as Han, Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) and then-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) New Taipei City mayoral candidate Hou You-yi (侯友宜) all took part in his live broadcasts.
During the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) presidential primary this year, DPP Chairman Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) and former premier William Lai (賴清德) also appeared on his online show, the Ministry of National Defense invited him as a celebrity endorser to its TV show and even President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) met with him.
However, they all looked small next to Chen, a fitness- coach-turned-Web-celebrity, putting up a smiling face despite Chen’s use of foul language.
As Chen takes advantage of his connections with influential politicians, they also approach him for a reason. If they want to win elections, they need to control the most effective communication tools, as these can change not only our lifestyles but also our political choices. Popular streamers can easily attract tens of thousands of viewers to watch their shows, or receive more than a million hits for an episode.
As a result, they have a stronger voice in society and ignore law and authority, acting more arrogantly by the day. This is the cause of the chaos that Lien created and the bullying of another streamer, Wu Hsiao-che (吳小哲), whose rivals allegedly broke his arms and legs after kidnapping him in Pingtung County.
Web celebrities are a product of the Internet era, and the purpose of what they say and do is to attract attention.
Taiwan is politically deeply divided. While political talk shows on traditional media are regulated by journalism ethics and the laws, online streamers enjoy a greater freedom of speech, as live streaming does not need government approval.
The National Communications Commission should draw up a code of conduct and principles for interaction between platform operators and online streamers, and strengthen streaming management.
Online criminal behavior, whether threats, slander or actual crimes extended from the Internet into society, should be investigated by police in a timely manner. It should not allow these problems to grow further.
Sandy Yeh is secretary-general of the Asian Association of Police Studies.
Translated by Eddy Chang
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
RSS