ICDF doing great work
After reading Juan Fernando Herrara Ramos’ interview with International Cooperation and Development Fund (ICDF) Deputy Secretary-General Lee Pai-po (李?浡) (“The important role TaiwanICDF plays in Taiwan’s diplomacy,” May 7, page 13), I would like to share my own experience with this organization.
I worked as the ICDF’s English consultant for almost two years from 2000 to 2002. During this time, I worked on dozens of reports and articles that appeared in the ICDF’s quarterly publication: “International Cooperation and Development,” on its Web site (which for a time I redesigned). I edited many reports submitted by ICDF personnel from projects all around the world, and worked closely with a number of foreign and Taiwanese professionals and academics who were also involved.
I even edited the work of former secretary-general Tien Hung-mao (田弘茂) and then-acting secretary-general Yang Tzu-pao (楊子葆).
It was a truly satisfying and rewarding experience working at this level on such important projects.
Needless to say, Taiwan’s international aid programs did not begin with the ICDF.
The nation had been distributing technical assistance and aid since it first dispatched agricultural specialists to Africa in the early 1960s, but the ICDF has now taken up this torch in impressive and highly beneficial new ways, and is a modern organization that is at the very forefront of international development — without question a major contribution in global affairs.
I could not agree more with this interview about the importance of the ICDF’s generous work and the way the organization is involved in vital development projects in areas of agricultural development, public health, human resources, education, and business and technology.
To gain an understanding of the range of work I was involved in, I worked on papers and accounts about a bamboo housing project in El Salvador, a tourism development project in Belize, a fishery workshop in the Indo-Pacific region, a Panama fishers’ loan project, cooperative flower production and marketing in Paraguay, and aquaculture development in Saudi Arabia.
It was all an amazing ride, and I felt honored to be so closely associated with these important global development projects. It gave me special satisfaction, as I had obtained a bachelor of arts in international relations from San Francisco State University and I felt this was a true “international” position.
To this day I miss my station there.
One of my key responsibilities at the ICDF was writing an introductory editorial to the quarterly publication. Here I had the honor of writing a memorial after the 9/11 attacks, in which I asked for peace to prevail, and that the ICDF and “all good and hopeful people” pledged “to forever remain involved in mankind, cultivating the best, most constructive, most life-affirming results” in their work.
In another I wrote of the dawning of a new age of possibility for the ICDF, and that the organization was “staying the course” in its efforts “to create prosperity and social stability” in nations worldwide.
A high point of my experience could have been at an anniversary celebration — the ICDF was only five years old at that time — when I (almost) met then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), who had come to the office in Taipei’s Tianmu District (天母).
In one work I edited in the quarterly publication, the story Hometown (故鄉) by Chinese author Lu Xun (魯迅) offered some valuable food for thought as we move forward on this cooperative path:
There is nothing concrete about the existence of hope. It is similar to a road. Actually, there was no road before a number of people have walked the path to create it.
With such aims in mind, I look forward to all the cooperative development work that the ICDF can do in the future.
David Russell Pendery
Taipei
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
On Monday last week, American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) Director Raymond Greene met with Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers to discuss Taiwan-US defense cooperation, on the heels of a separate meeting the previous week with Minister of National Defense Minister Wellington Koo (顧立雄). Departing from the usual convention of not advertising interactions with senior national security officials, the AIT posted photos of both meetings on Facebook, seemingly putting the ruling and opposition parties on public notice to obtain bipartisan support for Taiwan’s defense budget and other initiatives. Over the past year, increasing Taiwan’s defense budget has been a sore spot
Media said that several pan-blue figures — among them former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱), former KMT legislator Lee De-wei (李德維), former KMT Central Committee member Vincent Hsu (徐正文), New Party Chairman Wu Cheng-tien (吳成典), former New Party legislator Chou chuan (周荃) and New Party Deputy Secretary-General You Chih-pin (游智彬) — yesterday attended the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) military parade commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. China’s Xinhua news agency reported that foreign leaders were present alongside Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), such as Russian President Vladimir Putin, North Korean leader Kim
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) is expected to be summoned by the Taipei City Police Department after a rally in Taipei on Saturday last week resulted in injuries to eight police officers. The Ministry of the Interior on Sunday said that police had collected evidence of obstruction of public officials and coercion by an estimated 1,000 “disorderly” demonstrators. The rally — led by Huang to mark one year since a raid by Taipei prosecutors on then-TPP chairman and former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) — might have contravened the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法), as the organizers had