On Jan. 7, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government suddenly announced that an additional 10 percent of school seats and government jobs would be set aside for the “economically weaker sections,” meaning poor people among the upper castes. This was on top of the already extensive quotas for various historically oppressed castes under India’s wide-ranging affirmative-action policy. The government rushed through a constitutional amendment to this effect on Jan. 8 and 9. The decision might well be challenged in the courts, but the announcement was an implicit confession of three failures:
The first failure is that of affirmative action. After almost seven decades, the world’s biggest and longest-running such program — mandated in India’s 1950 constitution as a temporary expedient for 15 years — has failed to ameliorate historical caste injustice. Governments have repeatedly broadened affirmative action to include larger swaths of public life, target more groups, and cover promotions as well as recruitment. Modi has been unable to fix this situation, which he inherited, but did not create.
On Jan. 21, following Modi’s surprise announcement, Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar called for a census of all castes in 2021 to create a system for reserving jobs based on each caste’s share of the population.
The net result is that Indians are more sharply conscious of caste identity today than at independence in 1947. Far from steadily weakening over time, caste identity — and caste-based inequality — has been further entrenched. India now has a frozen equilibrium of caste-defined access to public institutions and services. And with Dalits — formerly called “untouchables” — being such a powerful voting group, no political party or leader dares to suggest the abolition of these set-asides.
Unsurprisingly, the majority of benefits intended for poor, downtrodden and oppressed castes have been captured by the elite among them. Entitlements that were meant to address moral claims of equal citizenship have been swallowed by cynical political powerbrokers. This is especially true of caste-based political parties in which the founders’ children inherit the leadership, creating family dynasties.
A second, related failure is that more than 70 years after independence, India has not managed to forge a truly national identity. Instead, the country consists of a collection of minorities who cling ever more fiercely to their group identities to obtain public benefits. Dalit caste identity is recorded at birth and reinforced throughout a citizen’s life. In politics, caste calculations are crucial in selecting candidates to match the demographics of each constituency, and in choosing coalition leaders to head state and federal governments.
Finally, the government’s recent set-aside announcement was an implicit admission of failure to create jobs for the millions of young people entering the workforce. Modi promised in his 2014 election campaign to create 20 million new jobs per year by unleashing India’s entrepreneurial potential. Instead, the unemployment rate is at its highest level since the early 1970s.
The government sat on the bleak unemployment figures for months, prompting two members of the Indian National Statistical Commission to resign in protest, before the report was finally leaked to the Business Standard newspaper on Jan. 31.
According to the Indian National Sample Survey Office, the unemployment rate reached 6.1 percent in 2017-2018, compared with 2.2 percent in 2011-2012, with people aged 15 to 29 and urban women the worst hit.
Higher unemployment is partly a result of Modi’s egregious decision in 2016 to demonetize India’s highest-denomination bank notes of 500 rupees and 1,000 rupees (about US$7 and US$14 respectively). This had a particularly severe effect on the informal sector, which employs more than 90 percent of the country’s workforce. Demonetization not only cost India at least 1.5 million jobs; it also failed to achieve its primary goal of uncovering “black money,” because 99 percent of the cash was returned to banks.
According to independent experts, the latest unemployment numbers are alarming, but not surprising, because signs of rising joblessness had been visible for some time. With a general election due by May, the government’s reluctance to release the report is understandable.
The approaching election also helps to explain the government’s sudden embrace of expanded set-asides. Having failed to create jobs, the government is instead dividing the existing pie among important groups of voters. The reality of job scarcity is to be camouflaged in the sop of set-asides. This is “placebo politics” at its worst. Electoral imperatives have also driven budget giveaways, with something for nearly everyone.
Leading the first Indian government in 30 years to enjoy a comfortable majority in its own right, Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) had the opportunity to act on its election slogan of minimum government, maximum governance. Instead, it has largely squandered the chance to undertake significant structural reforms that would have put India on the path of freer markets. The BJP has now retreated to the same populist and socialist nostrums of its main opponent, the Congress party. Perhaps Modi was spooked by sizeable losses in three important state elections in December last year. He also faces the political headache of stress in the agricultural sector.
India might still be the world’s fastest-growing major economy, but its two main parties’ tendency to choose the path of least resistance and defer deep reforms is postponing prosperity for the average Indian. What Modi’s government really announced on Jan. 7 is that life will remain nasty, brutish and short for far too many people for some time yet.
Ramesh Thakur, a former UN assistant secretary-general, is a professor at Australian National University and coconvenor of the Asia-Pacific Leadership Network for Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Disarmament.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Within Taiwan’s education system exists a long-standing and deep-rooted culture of falsification. In the past month, a large number of “ghost signatures” — signatures using the names of deceased people — appeared on recall petitions submitted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) against Democratic Progressive Party legislators Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) and Wu Pei-yi (吳沛憶). An investigation revealed a high degree of overlap between the deceased signatories and the KMT’s membership roster. It also showed that documents had been forged. However, that culture of cheating and fabrication did not just appear out of thin air — it is linked to the
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
Taiwan People’s Party Legislator-at-large Liu Shu-pin (劉書彬) asked Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) a question on Tuesday last week about President William Lai’s (賴清德) decision in March to officially define the People’s Republic of China (PRC), as governed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as a foreign hostile force. Liu objected to Lai’s decision on two grounds. First, procedurally, suggesting that Lai did not have the right to unilaterally make that decision, and that Cho should have consulted with the Executive Yuan before he endorsed it. Second, Liu objected over national security concerns, saying that the CCP and Chinese President Xi
China’s partnership with Pakistan has long served as a key instrument in Beijing’s efforts to unsettle India. While official narratives frame the two nations’ alliance as one of economic cooperation and regional stability, the underlying strategy suggests a deliberate attempt to check India’s rise through military, economic and diplomatic maneuvering. China’s growing influence in Pakistan is deeply intertwined with its own global ambitions. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a flagship project of the Belt and Road Initiative, offers China direct access to the Arabian Sea, bypassing potentially vulnerable trade routes. For Pakistan, these investments provide critical infrastructure, yet they also
RSS