A strict immigration policy has helped make Japan one of the world’s oldest and most homogeneous societies. Now, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s plan to invite as many as a half-million foreign workers is testing the country’s tolerance for change.
Abe is preparing to introduce legislation to allow migrants to start filling vacancies next year in sectors hit worst by the country’s shrinking population.
While the government has not released a target, local media including Kyodo news agency have reported numbers that would represent a 40 percent increase over the 1.3 million foreign workers now living in the country.
In a sign of urgency, Abe’s government has announced a start date on April next year for the policy before debate has begun in parliament. The proposal is among the first he is seeking to tackle after last month winning a historic third term as leader of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party, paving the way for him to become the country’s longest-serving prime minister.
If passed, the legislation would amount to Japan’s most dramatic immigration overhaul since the 1990s, when it let “trainees” from Asian nations work in the country. Foreigners made up only about 1.7 percent of the country’s population as of April, compared with 3.4 percent in South Korea and about 12 percent in Germany.
Abe got a reminder of the risks on Sunday last week as more than 100 noisy protesters marched through Tokyo’s upmarket Ginza shopping district, waving rising sun flags and urging the plan’s withdrawal.
Although the group was outnumbered by police and pursued by counterprotesters chanting “racists go home,” they appeared keen to tap into anti-immigrant sentiment that has bubbled up elsewhere in the developed world.
The organizer calls itself Japan First, in an allusion to US President Donald Trump’s “America First” policies.
“Far-right parties have very little support in Japan,” said Eriko Suzuki, a professor who researches migration at Kokushikan University. “But there are a lot more people, a kind of reserve army, who are vaguely concerned about admitting foreigners. If the government doesn’t put together appropriate policies, that unease will increase.”
The risks of inaction could be just as great as Japan’s declining population takes its toll on the economy.
In a survey published by the Japan Chamber of Commerce and Industry in June, two-thirds of companies said that they were short of workers.
The number of companies folding because of a lack of workers jumped by 40 percent in the first half of the financial year from the same period last year, Teikoku Databank Ltd said.
Abe’s plan, set to be introduced in the parliamentary session beginning later this month, calls for creating two classes of foreign workers to serve in about 10 as-yet-unspecified industries.
Lower-skilled migrants would be allowed to stay for as long as five years and barred from bringing their families. More highly skilled workers could bring family members and stay longer -— potentially gaining permanent residence.
Japanese Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga on Friday said that the total number of new workers has not been determined.
“It’s a sea change in Japan’s immigration policy,” said Ippei Torii of Solidarity Network with Migrants Japan, who has for decades supported foreign workers experiencing problems. “Japan is finally getting around to thinking about how to deal with this.”
Japan First Tokyo chapter head Mikio Okamura called for the government to spend money on improving pay and conditions for Japanese workers, rather than relying on foreigners.
“Before you let in foreigners, you should deal with Japan’s unemployed. We want them to use tax money to do that,” Okamura told Bloomberg News. “Then, we would have Japanese people looking after the elderly. That would be the happiest result for the Japanese and for the foreigners, as well.”
Other, more mainstream groups have expressed concerns, with the Japanese Trade Union Confederation questioning the lack of public debate in a letter submitted to the government in August.
The group, known as Rengo, has said that foreign workers should not be accepted without careful consideration.
Japan has had a difficult history of attracting foreign blue-collar workers. The country invited in Brazilians and Peruvians of Japanese descent when the economy was growing, but ended up offering to pay them to leave after the 2008 financial crisis.
A system of accepting mostly Asian “trainees” — launched in 1993 and officially intended to transfer skills to developing countries — turned out mostly to provide a supply of labor at less than minimum wage, while often preventing participants from leaving jobs where they were treated badly.
Japanese media regularly report on foreign students struggling with massive debts owed to the shady brokers who bring them over.
Some of the issues were tackled in an outline of the coming legislation published on Thursday.
Under it, foreign workers must be paid at least as much as their Japanese counterparts and would be allowed to change jobs within the same sector.
Nevertheless, their presence could hold down wages, some economists have said — working against Abe’s six-year push to raise incomes and fight deflation.
The influx of labor could also hold back necessary progress in improving productivity, said Yoichi Kaneko, a former Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development economist and lawmaker, who now works for an information technology firm.
“The labor shortage is a reality, but if you bring in foreigners, working conditions will not improve and the minimum wage will not rise,” Kaneko said. “That may be good for companies, but for the workers it’s not good at all.”
Within Taiwan’s education system exists a long-standing and deep-rooted culture of falsification. In the past month, a large number of “ghost signatures” — signatures using the names of deceased people — appeared on recall petitions submitted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) against Democratic Progressive Party legislators Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) and Wu Pei-yi (吳沛憶). An investigation revealed a high degree of overlap between the deceased signatories and the KMT’s membership roster. It also showed that documents had been forged. However, that culture of cheating and fabrication did not just appear out of thin air — it is linked to the
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
Taiwan People’s Party Legislator-at-large Liu Shu-pin (劉書彬) asked Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) a question on Tuesday last week about President William Lai’s (賴清德) decision in March to officially define the People’s Republic of China (PRC), as governed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as a foreign hostile force. Liu objected to Lai’s decision on two grounds. First, procedurally, suggesting that Lai did not have the right to unilaterally make that decision, and that Cho should have consulted with the Executive Yuan before he endorsed it. Second, Liu objected over national security concerns, saying that the CCP and Chinese President Xi
China’s partnership with Pakistan has long served as a key instrument in Beijing’s efforts to unsettle India. While official narratives frame the two nations’ alliance as one of economic cooperation and regional stability, the underlying strategy suggests a deliberate attempt to check India’s rise through military, economic and diplomatic maneuvering. China’s growing influence in Pakistan is deeply intertwined with its own global ambitions. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a flagship project of the Belt and Road Initiative, offers China direct access to the Arabian Sea, bypassing potentially vulnerable trade routes. For Pakistan, these investments provide critical infrastructure, yet they also
RSS