Rice is a staple for South Koreans, but as New York restaurateur Bobby Yoon explains it, the connection is deeper, almost spiritual.
“We need the perfect bowl of rice for each meal,” said Yoon, whose recently opened barbecue joint in Manhattan is an offshoot of Haeundae Somunnan Amso Galbijip, his grandfather’s venerable Busan institution.
“It doesn’t have a flavor, but there is also a certain umami to it when cooked well,” he said.
Perfecting rice that is integral to such everyday dishes as bulgogi and kimchi jjigae needs the best cooker possible, one that produces perfect grains without scorching them. The countertop appliances are given as gifts when people get married or move to a new house, and can symbolize wealth and good health for the family.
By far the most popular brand is the Cuckoo, which emits a distinctive sound similar to the call of the bird it is named after as it releases steam during the cooking process.
That obsession and stranglehold on the market has made Cuckoo Holdings founder Koo Ja-sin a billionaire. The company controls about 70 percent of South Korea’s market for rice cookers — easily outselling domestic rival Cuchen — and exports to 25 countries, mostly in Asia.
“The market is not huge, and there were already technology barriers when other big brands were looking to penetrate it,” said Yang Ji-hye, an analyst at Meritz Securities in Seoul. “Cuckoo seized the niche market and has grown big.”
Koo, 77, started the firm in 1978 after a brief career in politics, serving as secretary to a local lawmaker. He began by manufacturing rice cookers for large companies such as LG Electronics.
After orders dwindled to a trickle during the Asian financial crisis, he started his own brand in 1998.
The public latched on to the “do Cuckoo” catchphrase from the firm’s television commercials and sales quickly grew.
Cuckoo shares have returned 127 percent, including reinvested dividends, since its 2014 initial public offering in Seoul, outpacing the 20 percent return of the Kospi Index of 780 South Korean companies.
“Koreans believe that what’s made of rice is good for your health,” said Jun Kyung-woo, coauthor of the book Dining in Seoul. “When someone feels unwell, they even attribute that to not eating enough rice.”
Koo has a net worth of US$1.1 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, based mainly on his and the family’s stake in the holding company and in Cuckoo Homesys, which rents appliances such as water purifiers.
Koo is chairman of the holding company, while the oldest of his two sons — Koo Bon-hak — runs the business.
Koo Bon-hak, 48, is chief executive officer and holds the largest stake in Cuckoo. He joined the company in 1995 after earning a master’s degree in accounting from the University of Illinois.
A spokeswoman for Cuckoo, which also manufactures dishwashers, blenders and other kitchen appliances, declined to comment.
While Cuckoo dominates the market for cookers, it is battling long-term trends that could undermine growth. Rice consumption in South Korea has tumbled by 50 percent in the past three decades as wheat-based products such as pasta and bread have gained wider acceptance, and the growing number of one-person households and dual-income families has contributed to the popularity of microwavable rice, which is less time-consuming and easier to cook.
Overseas sales, which account for about 10 percent of the company’s revenue, were hit by the fallout from tensions last year between South Korea and China over the US-led deployment of an anti-missile system.
Exports of Cuckoo rice cookers to China shrank 21 percent last year compared with 2016, HI Investment & Securities in Seoul said in a June report.
Cuckoo products are sold in 25 countries, including China, Russia and Vietnam, with China making up about 40 percent of overseas sales, the company said.
Its rice cookers are customized to match each country’s environment, accounting for differences in temperature and humidity.
For many South Koreans living abroad, a rice cooker is a reminder of home and a link to their country’s culture.
When Yoon was a student in Pennsylvania, he said his mother sent him a Cuckoo for his dorm room, but he was unable to make it work because the power outlet was different than in South Korea.
“My mom cried because I couldn’t use it,” Yoon said. “That’s how much a rice cooker means for the family.”
Father’s Day, as celebrated around the world, has its roots in the early 20th century US. In 1910, the state of Washington marked the world’s first official Father’s Day. Later, in 1972, then-US president Richard Nixon signed a proclamation establishing the third Sunday of June as a national holiday honoring fathers. Many countries have since followed suit, adopting the same date. In Taiwan, the celebration takes a different form — both in timing and meaning. Taiwan’s Father’s Day falls on Aug. 8, a date chosen not for historical events, but for the beauty of language. In Mandarin, “eight eight” is pronounced
In a recent essay, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” a former adviser to US President Donald Trump, Christian Whiton, accuses Taiwan of diplomatic incompetence — claiming Taipei failed to reach out to Trump, botched trade negotiations and mishandled its defense posture. Whiton’s narrative overlooks a fundamental truth: Taiwan was never in a position to “win” Trump’s favor in the first place. The playing field was asymmetrical from the outset, dominated by a transactional US president on one side and the looming threat of Chinese coercion on the other. From the outset of his second term, which began in January, Trump reaffirmed his
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
It is difficult to think of an issue that has monopolized political commentary as intensely as the recall movement and the autopsy of the July 26 failures. These commentaries have come from diverse sources within Taiwan and abroad, from local Taiwanese members of the public and academics, foreign academics resident in Taiwan, and overseas Taiwanese working in US universities. There is a lack of consensus that Taiwan’s democracy is either dying in ashes or has become a phoenix rising from the ashes, nurtured into existence by civic groups and rational voters. There are narratives of extreme polarization and an alarming
RSS