How strange it is that a war of words should break out just because new Executive Yuan spokeswoman Kolas Yotaka, who is an Amis, writes her name in romanized form, using Latin letters.
Taiwan really is an abnormal nation, especially when it comes to the way people think about language. Even the most apolitical and widespread way of writing — the Latin alphabet — can set off a big argument.
Writing consists of symbols that are used to record spoken language and its most important function is to accurately and efficiently express spoken sounds. The Latin alphabet, which has been tested in practical use over many centuries and is now used by more than two-thirds of the world’s countries, should be the best choice.
When researching languages that do not yet have any written form, most linguists use Latin letters to write them down. For example, the 1,200 Austronesian languages are all recorded using Latin spellings.
English, German, French, Spanish and countless other languages also use varieties of the Latin alphabet, as do most of the countries included in the New Southbound Policy, such as Vietnam, Indonesia and Malaysia.
Even in Japan, which has long had its own phonetic scripts called kana, the names of roads and stations are generally displayed in romanized form, which makes it easy to reach out and integrate with the international community.
It is hard to imagine what kind of writing could be more useful than Latin letters. If Taiwanese stick to only using Chinese characters while rejecting Latin letters, whether Taiwan wants to move toward China or the wider world could be questioned.
Latin letters, which gained widespread use in Europe under the influence of the Roman Empire, have not been valued in Taiwan since they arrived. Not only have the regimes that came from abroad and were heavily influenced by Chinese culture tended to suppress romanization, but many members of Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese) and Hakka-speaking groups who are accustomed to using Chinese characters also oppose it.
The earliest writing used in Taiwan was the Latin alphabet, not Chinese characters. In the 17th century, Spanish missionaries in northern Taiwan used Latin letters to write down the Aboriginal language spoken around Tamsui (淡水), while Dutch missionaries in the south did the same for the Sinkan language, a form of Siraya.
As the survival space of the Pingpu, or lowland Aborigines, became increasingly restricted, these written languages gradually disappeared along with the spoken ones.
In the 19th century, Protestant missionaries again brought romanization to Taiwan, and this time it lasted longer and was used over a wider area, with romanized forms of Hakka, Aboriginal languages and Hoklo. However, these writing systems were again suppressed.
It is sad that when people use internationally understood Latin letters to write their native languages and spell their names, they are not given the respect they deserve.
Newly appointed Minister of Education Yeh Jiunn-rong (葉俊榮) should think long and hard about this issue.
If Taiwan wants to reach out to the international community and establish a Taiwanese consciousness, Taiwanese will have to throw off the chains of the Han Chinese language and culture, and formulate language policies centered on indigenous and local languages, and they should use the form of writing that is most in line with the international community.
Chiang Jih-yingh is a board member of the Taiwanese Romanization Association and a teacher of the Hoklo language.
Translated by Julian Clegg
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS